바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN2287-1608
  • E-ISSN2287-1616
  • KCI

Korea Citation Index and Its Macro Bibliometrics

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2013, v.2 no.2, pp.194-211
https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2013.2.2.194
So hyeong Kim

Abstract

This paper introduces the Korea Citation Index (KCI) and also some macro statistics of KCI. KCI started service since 2008 by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), but the data has been gathered from 1998. Our findings are as follows: heavy reliance on books in humanities, but papers as the main reference in all other disciplines. Impact factor is an increasing trend in all disciplines. Social science has the highest impact factor among all fields. In some fields even in science and engineering areas, there are more KCI papers than Korean JCR papers and impact factors of the KCI are higher than JCR. As for the distinction between nationally and internationally fields or journals, some disciplines in social science are clearly nationally oriented. NSE journals listed in both KCI and JCR, however, are not clear in terms of impact factor, but clear in terms of the numbers of papers.

keywords
Korea Citation Index, KCI, impact factor, non-English journal, non-English citation database, national oriented journal

Reference

1.

Adler, R., Ewing, J. and Taylor, P. (2009) Citation statistics: a report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS), Statistical Science 24(1), 1-14.

2.

Althouse, B.M. et al. (2009) Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27–34.

3.

Bordons, M., Fernandez, M.T. and Gomez, I. (2002) Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country, Scientometrics 53(2), 195–206.

4.

Chen, K. (2004) The construction of the Taiwan Humanities Citation Index, Online Information Review, 28(6), 410-419.

5.

Choi, T., Kim, S.H., and Yoon, A.R. (2013) Analysis on Supporting Systems for Domestic Academic Journals, National Research Foundation, May. (in Korean)

6.

Fung, I. (2008) Citation of non-English peer review publications: some Chinese examples, Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5-12, doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-12.

7.

Garfield, E. (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178, 471-479.

8.

Hicks, D. (1999) The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, 44(2), 193–215.

9.

Hicks, D. (2004) The four literatures of social science, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Moed, H. (ed), Kluwer Academic, 473-496.

10.

Jin, B. and Wang, B. (1999) Chinese science citation database: its construction and application, Scientometrics, 45(2), 325-332.

11.

Julia, O.L. et al. (2008) Some aspects of citation indexes in Spain: a comparative analysis, Scientometrics, 75(2), 313–318.

12.

King, D.A. (2004) The scientific impact of nations, Nature, 430, 311–316.

13.

Ko, Y.M., and Park, J.Y. (2013) An index for evaluating journals in a small domestic citation index database whose citation rate is generally very low: a test based on the Korea Citation Index (KCI) database, Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 404-411.

14.

Ko, Y.M., Cho, S.-R. and Park, Y.S. (2011) A study on the optimization of KCI-based index (Kor-Factor) in evaluating Korean journals, Scientometrics, 88(1), 61-71.

15.

Kosmopoulos, C. and Pumain, D. (2007) Citation, citation, citation: bibliometrics, the web and the social sciences and humanities, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Web and Science, document 411.

16.

Larsen, P.O. and Von Ins, M. (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 84(3): 575–603.

17.

Leydesdorff, L. and Bihui, J. (2004) Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database, Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 41, 488-495.

18.

Liang, L., Rousseau, R. and Zhong, Z. (2011) Non-English Journals and Papers in Physics: Bias in Citations?, Proceedings of the ISSI 2011 Conference, Noyons, E., Ngulube, P. and Leta, J. (eds.), ISSI, Leiden University and University of Zululand, 463-473.

19.

Lillquist, E. and Green, S. (2010) The discipline dependence of citation statistics, Scientometrics, 84(3), 749-762.

20.

Meneghini, R., Mugnaini, R. and Packer, A. L. (2006) International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals: a scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases, Scientometrics, 69(3), 529–538.

21.

Negishi, M., Sun, Y. and Shigi, K. (2004) Citation database for Japanese papers: a new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society, Scientometrics, 60(3), 333–351.

22.

Rabishankar, G. and Anup, K.D. (2011) Indian Citation Index: a new web platform for measuring performance of Indian research periodicals, Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 33–35.

23.

Ren, S., Zu, G. and Wang, H.F. (2002) Statistics hide impact of non-English journals, Nature, 415(6873), 732.

24.

Rousseau, R. et al. (2001) Observations concerning the two- and three-year synchronous impact factor: based on the Chinese Science Citation Database, Journal of Documentation, 57(3), 349-357.

25.

Seo, T.S., Jung, E.G. and Kim, H. (2013) Patterns of citing Korean DOI journals according to CrossRef's cited-by linking and a local journal citation database, Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 1(2), 58-68.

26.

Seol, S.S. and Song, C.H. (1999) Theoretical review of the classification of research activities, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2(3), 19-33.

27.

Seol, S.S. and Park, J.M. (2008) Knowledge sources of innovation studies in Korea: a citation analysis, Scientometrics, 75(1), 3-20.

28.

Seol, S.S., Zin, F. and Kwon, S. (2010) An analysis of Chinese studies on the management of science, technology and innovation, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18(1), 161-182.

29.

Song, C.H. and Seol, S.S. (1999) Philosophy and structure of new classification of science and technology, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2(3), 33-47.

30.

Su, X.N., Han, X.M. and Han, X.N. (2001) Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index, Online Information Review, 25(6), 365-369.

31.

Su, X., Deng, S. and Shen, S. (2012) The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, online publishing, December, 1-16.

32.

Thed, N. et al. (2001) Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research per-formance, Scientometrics 51(1), 335–346.

33.

Wu, Y. (2004) China scientific and technical papers and citations (CSTPC): history, impact and outlook, Scientometrics, 60(3), 385–397.

34.

Yang, S. et al. (2010) A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars, Scientometrics, 85(3), 755-765.

35.

Zhou, P. and Leydesdorff, L. (2007) The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics, Scientometrics, 72(2), 185-200.

36.

Zhou, P., Su, X. and Leydesdorff, L. (2010) A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(7), 1360-1376.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy