바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Moderating Effect of Operations Efficiency on the Links between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: The UK Evidence

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2015, v.4 no.1, pp.76-102
https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2015.4.1.076
Ramakrishnan Ramanathan (University of Bedfordshire Business School)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Drawing upon the resource-based-view of a firm, we investigate the moderating role of operations efficiency on the link between environmental and financial performance. Extant literature has highlighted that operations efficiency is closely associated with the environmental/financial performance of firms, but no empirical study has investigated how operations efficiency affects the link between environmental and financial performance. We argue that operations efficiency could act as a moderator of this relationship. To test the hypothesized relationships, we have used available secondary quantitative UK data, namely data on the environmental/financial performance of Britain’s most admired companies. By employing moderated regression analysis, we have found strong evidence for the moderating impact of operations efficiency. Our results are useful to managers in that they show that improvements in operations efficiency in a company can also help improve environmental/financial performance and vice versa.

keywords
Environmental performance, financial performance, operations efficiency, resource-based-view

Reference

1.

Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K. and Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999)Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of the stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.

2.

Angell, L.C. and Klassen, R.D. (1999) Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management, Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 575-598.

3.

Ambec, S. and Lanoie, P. (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview, Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62.

4.

Aras, G., Aybars, A. and Kuthu, O. (2010) Managing corporate performance: investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(3), 229-254.

5.

Balabanis, G., Phillips, H.C. and Lyall, J. (1998) Corporate social responsibility and economic performance of top British companies: are they linked? European Business Review, 98(1), 25-44.

6.

Barney, J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

7.

Barney, J.B., Wright, M. and Ketchen Jr., D.J. (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991, Journal of Management, 27(6), 625-641.

8.

Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T.M. (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm performance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.

9.

Boiral, O. (2007) Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth? Organization Science, 18, 127-146.

10.

Brammer, S., Brooks, C. and Pavelin, S. (2006) Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures, Financial Management, 35(3), 97-116.

11.

Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2008) Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.

12.

Britain’s Most Admired Companies (2008) Published by Management Today Magazine. (Accessible online at http://bmac.managementtoday.com/ accessed on 10th June, 2009)

13.

Brock, D. M., Yaffe, T. and Dembovsky, M. (2006) International diversification and performance: a study of global law firms, Journal of International Management, 12(4), 473-489.

14.

Brunnermeier, S.B. and Cohen, M.A. (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278-293.

15.

Burke, L. and Logsdon, J.M. (1996) How corporate social responsibility pays off, Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502.

16.

Callan, S.J. and Thomas, J.M. (2009) Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61-78.

17.

Capon, N., Farley, J.U. and Hoenig, S. (1990) Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis, Management Science, 36(10), 1143-1159.

18.

Chatterji, A.K., Levine, D.I. and Toffel, M.W. (2009) How well do social ratings measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169.

19.

Cohen, M.A., Fenn, S.A. and Konar, S. (1997) Environmental and financial performance: are they related? Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.

20.

Cordeiro, J.J. and Sarkis, J. (1997) Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts, Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104-114.

21.

Delmas, M. A. and Toffel. M.W. (2008) Organisational responses to environmental demands, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.

22.

Doh, J.P., Howton, S.D., Howton, S.W. and Siegel, D.S. (2009) Does the market respond to an endorsement of corporate social responsibility? The role of institutions, information and legitimacy, Journal of Management, Online First, published on June 1, 2009 as DOI:10.1177/0149206309337896.

23.

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

24.

Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F. and Eyadat, H. (2008) Green and competitive? an empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy, Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131-145.

25.

Elsayed, K. and Paton, D. (2005) The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 395-412.

26.

Elsayed, K. and Paton, D. (2009) The impact of financial performance on environmental policy: does firm life cycle matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(6), 397-413.

27.

Emerson, J. (2003) The blended value proposition: integrating social and financial returns, California Management Review, 45(4), 35-51.

28.

Filbeck, G. and Gorman, R.F. (2004) The relationship between environmental and financial performance of public utilities, Environmental Resource and Economics, 29(2), 137-157.

29.

Florida, R. (1996) Lean and Green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing, California Management Review, 39(1), 80-105.

30.

Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Marshfield.

31.

Freeman, R. and Evan, W.M. (1990) Corporate governance: a stakeholder interpretation, Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337-359.

32.

Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B. and Hansen, J.M. (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis, Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445.

33.

González-Benito, J. and González-Benito, O. (2005) An analysis of the relationship between environmental motivations and ISO14001 certification, British Journal of Management, 16(2), 133-148.

34.

Hair, F.J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

35.

Hart, S.L. (1995) A natural resource-based view of the firm, Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.

36.

Hart, S.L. and Ahuja, G. (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance, Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.

37.

Henriques, I. and Sadorksky, P. (1996) The determinants of an Environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381-395.

38.

Hitchens, D., Thankappan, S., Trainor, M., Clausen, J. and De Marchi, B. (2005) Environmental performance, competitiveness and the management of small businesses in Europe, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 541-557.

39.

Hitchens, D. (1999) The implications for competitiveness of environmental regulations for peripheral regions in the E.U., Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 27, 101-114.

40.

Hull, C.E. and Rothenburg, S. (2008) Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 781-789.

41.

Ilinitch, A.Y., Soderstrom, N.S. and Thomas, T.E. (1998) Measuring corporate environmental performance, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 17(4-5), 383-408.

42.

Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S.R., Portney, P.R. and Stavins, R.N. (1995) Environmental regulation and the competiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132-163.

43.

Jaffe, A.B. and Palmer, K. (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610-619.

44.

Jin, Z., Hewitt-Dundas, N. and Thompson, N.J. (2004) Innovativeness and performance: evidence from manufacturing sectors, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12(4), 255-266.

45.

Johnson R.A. and Greening, D.W. (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.

46.

Jones, T.M. (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics, Academy of Management review, 20(2), 404-437.

47.

Kaynak, H. (2003) The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405-435.

48.

Klassen, R.D. and Whybark, D.C. (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.

49.

Konar, S. and Cohen, M.A. (2001) Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281-289.

50.

Li, H. and Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.

51.

Lopez-Gamero, M.D., Molina-Azorin, J.F. and Claver-Cortez, E. (2009) The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3110-3121.

52.

Majumdar, S.K. and Marcus, A.A. (2001) Rules versus discretion: the productivity consequences of flexible regulation, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170-179.

53.

Margolis, J., Elfenbein, H.A. and Walsh, J. (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, mimeo, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

54.

Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P. (2003) Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.

55.

Marshall, R.S. and Brown, D. (2003) The strategy of sustainability: a systems perspective on environmental initiatives, California Management Review, 46(1), 101-126.

56.

Maxwell, J.W. (1996) What to do when win-win won’t work: environmental strategies for costly regulation, Business Horizons, 39(5), 60-63.

57.

McAlister, D.T., Ferrell, O.C. and Ferrell, L. (2005) Business and Society: A Strategic Approach to Social Responsibility, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

58.

McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (1997) Event studies in management research: theoretical and empirical issues, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 626-657.

59.

McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.

60.

Melnyk, S.A., Sroufe, R.P. and Calantone, R.L. (2003) Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance, Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 329-351.

61.

Miles and Shelvin (2001) Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers, 1st edition, Sage Publications: London, Ch 5 and 7.

62.

Montabon, F., Sroufe, R. and Narasimhan, R. (2007) An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998-1014.

63.

Moore, G. (2001) Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation of the UK supermarket industry, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299-315.

64.

Murty, M.N. and Kumar, S. (2003) Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of Porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries, Journal of Environmental Management, 67, 139-144.

65.

Orlitzky, M. (2001) Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167-180.

66.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. and Rynes, S.L. (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis, Organisation Studies, 24(3), 403-441.

67.

Peloza, J. (2006) Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance, California Management Review, 48(2), 52-72.

68.

Peloza, J. (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance, Journal of Management. Online First, published on April 20, 2009 as DOI:10.1177/0149206309335188.

69.

Peloza, J. and Papania, L. (2008) The link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: stakeholder salience and identification, Corporate Reputation Review, 11(2), 169-181.

70.

Porter, M.E. and van der Linde, C. (1995a) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.

71.

Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C. (1995b) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.

72.

Preston, L. (2001) Sustainability at Hewlett-Packard: from theory to practice, California Management Review, 43(3), 26-37.

73.

Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B. and Nath, P. (2014) The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms, Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(2), 169-182.

74.

Ramus, C.A. and Montiel, I. (2005) When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business and Society, 44(4), 377-414.

75.

Rothenberg, S., Pils, F.K. and Maxwell, J. (2001) Lean, green and the quest for superior environmental performance, Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 228-243.

76.

Rothwell, R. (1992) Industrial innovation and government environmental regulation: some lessons from the past, Technovation, 12(7), 447-458.

77.

Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J.A. and Sharma, S. (2008) The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: the moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence, British Journal of Management, 19(2), 185-203.

78.

Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2000) Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation, European Management Journal 18(4), 377-385.

79.

Rumelt, R.P. (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm, In Lamb R.B. (ed.) Competitive Strategic Management, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

80.

Russo M.V. and Fouts, P.A. (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.

81.

Salama, A. (2005) A note on the impact of environmental performance on financial performance, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 413-421.

82.

Samson, D. and Terziovski, M. (1999) The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 393-409.

83.

Sarkis, J. and Cordeiro, J.J. (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention technologies versus end-of-pipe practice, European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 102-113.

84.

Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P. and Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 163-176.

85.

Saville, D. and Wood, G.R. (1991) Statistical Methods: The Geometric Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York.

86.

Schaltegger, S. and Synnestvedt, T. (2002) The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial between environmental and economic performance, Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 339-346.

87.

Schuler, D.A. and Cording, M. (2006) A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioural model for consumers, Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540-558.

88.

Sharfman, M.P. and Fernando, C.S. (2008) Environmental risk management and the cost of capital, Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569-592.

89.

Slack, N., Chambers, S., Johnston, R. and Betts, A. (2009) Operations and Process Management, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, London.

90.

Thornton, D., Kagan, R.A., and Gunningham, N. (2003) Sources of corporate environmental performance, California Management Review, 46(1), 127-141.

91.

Toffel, M and Lee, K. (2009) Sustainability at Millipore, Harvard Business Publishing, ECCH Case Reference: 9-610-012.

92.

Triebswetter, U. and Hitchens, D. (2005) The impact of environmental regulation on the competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry- a comparison with other countries in the European Union, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 733-745.

93.

Triebswetter, U. and Wackerbauer, J. (2008) Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1484-1493.

94.

Vogel, D.J. (2005) Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility, California Management Review, 47(4), 19-45.

95.

Waddock S.A. and Graves, S.B. (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

96.

Wagner, M. and Schaltegger, S. (2004) The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empiical study of EU manufacturing, European Management Journal, 22(5), 557-572.

97.

Walls, M.R. and Dyer, J.S. (1996) Risk propensity and firm performance: a study of the petroleum exploration industry, Management Science, 42(7), 1004-1021

98.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

99.

Yu, W. and Ramanathan, R. (2015) An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance, International Journal of Production Research, (in Press).

100.

Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J. (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy