바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Industry-Based Complex Problem- Solving: Sustainable Policy Solutions to the Malaysian Water Crisis

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2016, v.5 no.1, pp.55-77
Cameron Richards (Southern Cross University)
Rory Padfield (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper focuses on how an integrated or systemic approach is needed to both investigate and connect different kinds of interdisciplinary inquiry and knowledge within and beyond universities to encourage more productive collaboration with the other three ‘macro stakeholders’ - government, business, and the wider community. In this way universities can and should provide a greater leadership role in sustainability, innovation and policy studies. Such a framework is needed to also help to change the view of many that academics should just play a supporting role of providing specialised technical expertise only to the other macro stakeholders. The interdisciplinary and collaborative framework developed here is applied to the on-going water crisis in Malaysia - an exemplary complex problem-solving basis for seeking sustainable policy solutions to diverse challenges. As further discussed, this was applied also in practice to a multi-stakeholder seminar on addressing the difficult policy challenges of the Malaysian water industry and sector.

keywords
Water policy, complex problem-solving, interdisciplinary research, university-industry partnerships, sustainable policy solutions

Reference

1.

Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.) (2003), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge UP.

2.

Biswas, A., Varis, O., and Tortajada, C. (eds.) (2005), Integrated Water Resources Management in South and Southeast Asia, Oxford University Press.

3.

Bernama (2012), Selangor Government to Proceed with Restructuring of Water Industry, Malaysian National News Agency, June 12, 2012. www.bernama.com

4.

Borschardt, M. (2009), Malaysia’s new-look water sector, Global Water Intelligence, 10 (6). http://www.globalwaterintel.com/archive/10/6/general/malaysias-new-look-water-sector.html

5.

Bunge, M. (2004), Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge, University of Toronto Press.

6.

Chelliapan, S., Wilby, T., and Sallis, P. (2006), Performance of an up-flow anaerobic stage reactor (UASR) in the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing macrolide antibiotics, Water Research, 40(3), 507-516.

7.

Chi, M. (2014, March 7) Despite water crisis, Selangor Mulls mowing down green lungs for highway, The Malay Mail Online.

8.

Chin, Y.K. (2008), The Water Tablet: Malaysian Water Reforms. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Ministry of Energy, Water and Communications.

9.

Conklin, J. (2005), Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems, Wiley.

10.

Forrester, J. (1991), System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years the systemic basis of policy making in the 1990s, in De Greene, K. (ed.) The Systemic Basis of Policy Making in the 1990s.

11.

Gilding, P. (2011), The Great Disruption, Bloomsbury Press.

12.

Heylighen, F. (2001), The science of self-organisation and adaptivity, in Kiel, L.D. (ed.) Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, Oxford: Eolss Publishers.

13.

Huitema, D., and Meijerink, S. (eds.) (2009), Water Policy Entrepreneurs, Edward Elgar.

14.

Kolko, J. (2012), Wicked problems: Problems worth solving, Austin Center for Design.

15.

IPPC (2014), Climate Change Impacts, Adaptations and Vulnerability: Summary for Policymakers. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/

16.

Lim, I. (2012), Peter Chin says hands tied in Selangor Water Deadlock, The Malaysian Insider. http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/print/malaysia/peter-chin-says-hands-tied-in-selangor-water-deadlock/

17.

Lingan, L., and Arbee, A. (2012), Drive to get a million signatures, New Straits Times. May 26. http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/drive-to-get-a-million-signatures-1.87753

18.

Mak, K. (2014, March 19) Current water crisis caused by over development and lack of planning, Straits Times.

19.

Ofonso, O., Monteiro, S., and Thompson, M. (2010), A growth model for the quadruple helix innovation theory, FEP Working Papers #370, Universidade do Porto. http://ideas.repec.org/p/por/fepwps/370.html#biblio

20.

Padfield, R., Richards, C., Yusop, Z., Parkey, J., Harrison, O., and Preece, C. (2014), Tackling wicked problems in the Malaysian water industry: a framework for university-industry research partnerships, Journal of Governance and Development, 10, 99-119.

21.

Repko, A. (2008), Interdisciplinary Research: Theory and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22.

Richards, C. (2012a) ,Policy studies as framework for the renewed role of ethics in science and technology, Philippiniana Sacra, 47(140), 409-442.

23.

Richards, C. (2012b) Sustainable policy making and implementation: towards a new paradigm for a changing world, Development Review, 21, Bangladesh National Academy for Planning and Development.

24.

Richards, C. (2013), Old wisdom for a new world in crisis?: the anagrammatic structure of integrated, optimal and sustainable problem-solving, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 15(1), 11-32.

25.

Richards, C., and Tanquilit, N. (2014), Sustainable solutions to ‘complex problem-solving’: a key to effective community and industry engagement and partnerships by university researchers, Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 1(1), 1-10.

26.

Richards, C. (2015), Outcomes-based authentic learning, portfolio assessment and a systems approach to ‘complex problem-solving’: related pillars for enhancing the innovative role of PBL in future higher education, International Journal of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 78-95. https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/pbl/article/view/1204

27.

Richards, C., and Farrokhnia, F. (2016), Optimising grounded theory for policy research: a knowledge-building approach to analysing WTO e-commerce policies, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1). http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/15/1/1609406915621380.full

28.

Repko, A. (2008), Interdisciplinary Research: Theory and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Rycroft, D., and Kash, R. (2004), The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century, Cengage Learning EMEA.

30.

Ruslan, A. (2014, February 11) Is Malaysia Facing a Future Water Shortage?, Business Insider Malaysia.

31.

Santiago, C. (2005), Water privatization in Malaysia, Aliran Monthly, 25(4). http://aliran.com/archives/monthly/2005a/4d.html

32.

Schon, D., and Rein, M. (1994), Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, Basic Books.

33.

Shamsudin, S., Dan'azumi, S., Aris, A., and Yusop, Z. (2014), Optimum combination of pond volume and outlet capacity of a stormwater detention pond using particle swarm optimization, Urban Water Journal, 11(2), 127-136.

34.

Smith, B. (2009), Water as a public good: the status of water under the general agreement on tariffs and trade, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (JICL), 17, 291.

35.

Tan, C. (2012), Saving Sungai Klang, The Star Newspaper, 29th May 2-4 Ecowatch.

36.

Tan, J. (2012), The pitfalls of water privatization: failure and reform in Malaysia, World Development, 40(12), 2552-2563.

37.

Ujang, Z., and Hense, M. (eds.) (2006), Municipal Wastewater Management in Developing Countries: Principles and engineering, IWA Publishing.

38.

UK Water Industry Research (UKWIR) (2013), UKWIR Homepage. [on-line] https://www.ukwir.org/site/web/content/home (Accessed: 01/02/2014)

39.

Weber, E., Memon, A., and Painter, B. (2011), Science, society, and water resources in New Zealand: recognizing and overcoming a societal impasse, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 13(1), 49-69.

40.

Yusop, Z., Tan, L., Ujang, Z., Mohamed, M., and Nasir, K. (2005), Runoff quality and pollution loadings from a tropical urban catchment, Water Science and Technology 52(9), 125-132.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy