바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Technological Catching-up of Nuclear Power Plant in Korea: The Case of OPR1000

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2016, v.5 no.1, pp.92-115
Tae Joon LEE
Young-Joon Lee (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper presents how Korea succeeded in developing an indigenous nuclear power plant model over fifty years. Long-lasting national R&D for technical progress and the Korean government for managerial process were the two pillars in the build-up of indigenous Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) technological capabilities. The concept of technological capabilities is used to examine its evolutionary process with a qualitative and longitudinal approach. The government had a developing country ambition to formulate a strategic plan for technical self-reliance on nuclear power plant while establishing the country's institutions and organization structure for the plan. Under the government leadership, it was national R&D that led to the resolution of a good number of technological problems, efficiently, by absorbing imported technologies and effectively adapting them to local circumstances.

keywords
Technological catching-up, nuclear power plant, Korea, government policy, nuclear R&D, OPR1000

Reference

1.

Abramovitz, M. (1956), Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May.

2.

Arundel, A., Smith, K., Patel, P., and Sirilli, G. (1998), The Future of Innovation Measurement in Europe, IDEA Paper.

3.

Bell, M., and Figueiredo, P. (2012), Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implications for research, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 33 (1), 14-40.

4.

Choi, Y.-M. (1996), Korean Experience of Infrastructure Development in Nuclear Power Program, IAEA Regional Workshop on Infrastructure Requirements and Organizational Aspects of Nuclear Power Programs, BATAN Training Centre, Jakarta, Indonesia, 22-26.

5.

Ha, Y.S. (1982), Republic of (South) Korea, Chapter 12 in Katz, J.E., and Marwah, O.S. (eds.) Nuclear Power in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Decision Making, Lexiton, USA: Lexington Books, 221-244.

6.

Hewlett, R.G. (1985), From proposal to program, in Pilat, J.F., Pendley, R.E., and Ebinger, C.K. (eds.) Atoms for Peace: An Analysis After Thirty Years, Boulder and London: Westview Press.

7.

Johnson, C.J. (1978), United States Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy and International Response: The Dilemma of the Dual Atom, MSc Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

8.

Kim, G. (1994), A study on the Development of Technological Capability of Korea in the 1980s, PhD thesis of Department of Economics, The Graduate School of Seoul National University, Korea (in Korean).

9.

Kim, L. (1999), Building technological capability for industrialization: analytical frameworks and Korea’s experience, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 111-136.

10.

Kim, B.-K. (2011), Nuclear Silk Road: The Koreanization of Nuclear Power Technology, Charleston, USA.

11.

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) (2007), Nuclear Power Project: Policy and Korean Experience, 1st (ed.) KAERI.

12.

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) (1990), The Thirty-year History of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea: KAERI (in Korean).

13.

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) (2009a) The Fifty-year History of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea: KAERI (in Korean).

14.

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) (2009b) 50 Years of Nuclear Energy, 50 Years of Prosperity, May, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST).

15.

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) (1999), Nuclear Power White Paper, Ministry of Energy and Resources (MOER), Korea (in Korean).

16.

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) (1990), Nuclear Power White Paper, MOER (Ministry of Energy and Resources), Korea (in Korean).

17.

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) (1999), Nuclear Power White Paper, Ministry of Energy and Resources (MOER), Korea (in Korean).

18.

Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (KHNP) (2007), OPR1000: Optimized Power Reactor 1000: Proven and Advanced Technology, Seoul, Korea

19.

Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (KHNP) (2011), Korean Experience and Recommendation for the first Nuclear Power Project Development, KHNP, Seoul, Korea.

20.

Korea Nuclear Society (2009), Fifty-year history of Nuclear Energy Development in Korea.

21.

Lall, S. (1992), Technological capabilities and industrialization, World Development, 20(2), 165-186.

22.

Lall, S. (1998), Technological capabilities in emerging Asia, Oxford Development Studies, 26(2), 213- 243.

23.

Lee, B.W. (1975), Korea Experience in implementing a nuclear power program, IAEA Bulletin, 17(1), 33-39.

24.

Lee, T.J. (2004), Technological learning by national R&D: the case of Korea in CANDU-type nuclear fuel, Technovation, 24(4), 287-297.

25.

Lee, T.J. (2010), Analytical framework of atoms for sustainable development, European Nuclear Conference 2010, Barcelona, 01 Jun. 2010.

26.

Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) (2013a), The 6th Electricity Supply Basic Plan (ESBP), February, Korea (in Korean).

27.

Mitchell, G.R. (1999), Global technology policies for economic growth, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(3), 205-214.

28.

Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Massachusetts and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

29.

Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) (2008), Nuclear Energy Outlook 2008, OECD.

30.

OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1996), Technology and Industrial Performance: Technology Diffusion, Productivity, Employment and Skills, International Competitiveness, Paris: OECD.

31.

Poneman, D. (1982), Nuclear Power in the Developing World, London, Boston and Sydney: George Allen and Unwin.

32.

Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Solow, R.M. (1957), Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statics, 39, August, 312-20.

34.

Teece, D., and Pisano, G. (1994), The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-555.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy