바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Analysis of Growth Engine Industries using the ORBIS DB

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2016, v.5 no.3, pp.275-292
Lee-Nam Kwon (KISTI)
Jun-Hwan Park (KISTI)
Yeong-Ho Moon (KISTI)
BangRae Lee
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Many countries set growth engine technologies and industries for economic growth and job creation. Each country always wants to know their technological or industrial position in the world in these industries. This study aims at identifying the worldwide position of 19 growth engine industries defined in Korean government. The methods are quantitative by counting the number of startup companies in the world. The ORBIS database was used to extract the number. Therefore, this article may be the first research for the world appearance of growth engine industries and its comparison between world and G7, and between G7 countries. Also, this may be the first study using the ORBIS database on the analysis of certain technology industries. Further, we showed a method to identify world features of technology industries.

keywords
Growth engine industry, startup company, global, G7, company analysis

Reference

1.

Aboelela, S.W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S.A., and Haas, J. (2007), Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature, Health Services Research, 42(1), 329-346.

2.

Apostel, L. (1972), Interdisciplinarity Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

3.

Beers, P.J., and Bots, P.W.G. (2009), Eliciting conceptual models to support interdisciplinary research, Journal of Information Science, Sage Publications.

4.

Audretsch and Feldman (1996), Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle, Review of Industrial Organization 11, 253-273.

5.

Bae, Y.H., Choe, J.S., Hwang, S.W., Lee, W.S., and Koh, M.J. (2011), A search for new methodology for nomination of future growth engine: focusing on the development of Korea Future Technology Index (KOFTI), Technology Innovation Research, 19(3), 0.

6.

Chun, S.P., Kim, Y.l., and Yu, H.S. (2013), ‘A comparative study of consumers’ Hype Cycle using web search traffic: focusing on NAVER and Google searches, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(4), 1109-1133.

7.

European Commission (2010), An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era: Putting Competitiveness and Sustainability at Center Stage, Brussels 614.

8.

European Commission (2011), High-Level Expert Group on Key Enabling Technologies: Final Report, Brussels.

9.

Chang, S.I., Jung, E.M., and Park, S.R. (2014), Assessment of Korea’s Growth Engine Policies and Future Challenges, KIET Research Report, 2014-723.

10.

Jarvenpaa, H.M., and Makinen, S.J. (2008), An empirical study of the existence of the Hype Cycle: a case of DVD technology, Engineering Management Conference, June 2008.

11.

Jarvenpaa, H.M., Makinen, S.J., and Seppanen, M. (2011), Patent and publishing activity sequence over a technology's life cycle, Technical Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 283-293.

12.

Kyung, J.S., and Jeong, S.P. (2006), An approach to classification of industry life cycle using main statistics index in the mobile market, Survey, 7(1), 55-84.

13.

Lee, T.G. (2015), Current growth engine policies and their policy implications, KERI Policy Research, 15-14.

14.

Levitt. T. (1965), Exploit the product life cycle, Harvard Business Review 43, 81-94.

15.

Livesey, F. (2012), Rationale for industrial policy based on industry maturity, Journal of Compet Trade, 12, 349-363.

16.

Martino, J. (2003), A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting, Technology Forecasting and Social Change (TFSC), 719-733.

17.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan (2010), Industrial Structure Vision 2010.

18.

National Economic Council (2009), A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs.

19.

National Science and Technology Council, Republic of Korea (April 2015) Comprehensive Action Plan for Future Growth Engine, Special Committee on Future Growth Engine.

20.

Porter, M. (1980), Compatative Strategy, New York: Free Press.

21.

Small and Medium Business Administration, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, (2015), A Guide to Government’s Small and Medium Business Support Policies 2016, 72-77.

22.

Klepper, S., and Graddy, E. (1990), The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure, RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1),0

23.

The White House (2011), A Strategy for American Innovation: Securing Our Economic Growth and Prosperity.

24.

Watts, R., and Porter, A. (1997), Innovation forecasting, Technical Forecasting and Social Change, 56, 25-47.

25.

Joint Ministries, Consolidated Action Plan for Future Growth Engine, Korean Government, April 2015.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy