바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Knowledge Capital in Economic Growth: A Panel Analysis of 120 Countries

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy / Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, (P)2287-1608; (E)2287-1616
2017, v.6 no.1, pp.94-110
Dong-Geon Lim (Seoul National University)
Jung, Jin Hwa
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper approaches knowledge capital as social infrastructure and analyzes its impact on economic growth. To this end, we constructed a panel dataset for 120 countries for the years 2000-2014 and estimated the economic growth function using the panel analysis. As proxies for knowledge capital, we used the R&D expenditure per capita and the number of patent applications per thousand people in each country, both measured in stock. Economic growth was measured in terms of real GDP per capita and real value added per capita at the industry level. The empirical findings demonstrate that knowledge capital accumulated in a society significantly promotes economic growth. Especially R&D stock increases real value added per capita in all industries-not only manufacturing, but also services and agriculture-implying substantial inter-industry spillover effects. The findings of this study suggest that knowledge capital boosts economic growth as core social infrastructure.

keywords
Knowledge capital, social infrastructure, economic growth, spillover effect, panel analysis

Reference

1.

Allred, B.B. and Park, W.G. (2007) Patent rights and innovative activity: evidence from national and firm-level data, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 878-900.

2.

Arrow, K.J. (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.

3.

Ayres, C.E. (1953) The role of technology in economic theory, American Economic Review, 43(2), 279-287.

4.

Battke, B., Schmidt, T.S., Stollenwerk, S. and Hoffmann, V.H. (2016) Internal or external spillovers - which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies, Research Policy, 45, 27-41.

5.

Bernstein, J.I. (1989) The structure of Canadian inter-industry R&D spillovers, and the rate of return to R&D, Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(3), 315-328.

6.

Bernstein, J.I. and Nadiri, M.I. (1988) Interindustry R&D spillovers, rate of returns, and production in high-tech industries, American Economic Review, 78(2), 429-434.

7.

Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P.O. and Manuneas, T.P. (2000) Infrastructure, specialization, and economic growth, Canadian Journal of Economics, 33(2), 506-622.

8.

Davidson, C. and Segerstrom, P. (1998) R&D subsidies and economic growth, RAND Journal of Economics, 29(3), 548-577.

9.

Fagerberg, J. (1996) Technology and competitiveness, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39-51.

10.

Geol, R.K. and Ram, R. (1994) Research and development expenditures and economic growth: a cross-country study, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42(2), 403-411.

11.

Greene, W.H. (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed., Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

12.

Griffith, R., Stephen, R. and Reenen, J.V. (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883-895.

13.

Griliches, Z. (1992) The search for R&D spillovers, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.

14.

Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) Can patents deter innovation? the anticommons in biomedical research, Science, 280(5364), 698-701.

15.

Jaffe, A.B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patent profits, and market value, American Economic Review, 76(5), 984-1001.

16.

Jones, C.I. (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth, Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759-784.

17.

Kim, K. and Hong, W. (2011) Effect of firm’s activities on their performances, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 14(2), 373-404. (in Korean)

18.

Leamer, E.E. (1983) Let’s take the con out of econometrics, American Economic Review, 73, 31-43.

19.

Levin, R. and Reiss, P.C. (1984) Test of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure, R&D patents and productivity, National Bureau of Economic Research Project Report, 175-208.

20.

Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regression, American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-963.

21.

López-Pueyo, C., Barcenilla-Visús, S. and Sanaú, J. (2008) International R&D spillovers and manufacturing productivity: a panel data analysis, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(2), 152-172.

22.

Piesse, J. and Thirtle, C. (2010) Agricultural R&D, technology and productivity, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Science, 365(1554), 3035-3047.

23.

Pöschl, J., Foster-McGregor, N. and Stehrer, R. (2016) International R&D spillovers and business service innovation, World Economy, 39(12), 2025-2045.

24.

Romer, P.M. (1987) Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization, American Economic Review, 77(2), 56-62.

25.

Sakakibara, M. and Branstetter, L. (2001) Do stronger patents induce more innovation? evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms, RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 77-100.

26.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper.

27.

Segerstrom, P.S. (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects, American Economic Review, 88(5), 1290-1310.

28.

Singh, L. (2004) Domestic and international knowledge spillovers in manufacturing industries in South Korea, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(5), 498-505.

29.

Weiss, H.K. (1965) Some growth considerations of research and development and the national economy, Management Science, 11(3), 368-394.

Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy