- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Validation of acid-base titration equivalence between spectroscopic titrator (SPT) and conventional titrators
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2021, v.34 no.6, pp.267-274
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2021.34.6.267
&
(2021). Validation of acid-base titration equivalence between spectroscopic titrator (SPT) and conventional titrators. Analytical Science and Technology, 34(6), 267-274, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2021.34.6.267
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Acid-base titration experiments were carried out using the same sample to obtain a direct comparison of analysis results between a new titrator and conventional Spectrator (SPT) titrators. This allowed the confirmation of an endpoint both by spectroscopic detection and by conventional titrators (automatic burette (ABT) and autotitrator (ATT)). Statistical analysis was performed on the measured values (endpoints) obtained using different titrators, to assess their differences by comparison of straightness, equivalence, ANOVA, F-test, and t-test results. The coefficients of determination, confirmed by straightness, were all >0.999. Thus, the null hypothesis that there was no statistical difference could not be rejected. The Bland-Altman analysis method was used to confirm agreement with the new experimental method. No discrepancy was found in the measured values obtained using different titrators used in this study.
- keywords
- automatic burette, autotitrator, spectrator, statistic analysis, bland-altman plot
Reference
1
1. D.A.A. Forigua and J. Meija, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 411, 1-2 (2019).
2
2. F.G. Page, Bull. Hist. Chem., 26(1), 66-72 (2001).
3
3. A. Johansson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 206, 97-109 (1988).
4
4. F. Szabadvary, ‘History of Analytical Chemistry: International Series of Monographs in Analytical Chemistry’, Elsevier, 2016.
5
5. D.A. Skoog, D.M. West, F.J. Holler and S.R. Crouch, ‘Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry’, 9th Ed., Cengage Learning, Boston, 2014.
6
6. S.L.R. Ellison and A. Williams, ‘Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement’, EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, 3rd Ed., 2012.
7
7. J. Shin, G. Chae, Y. Kim, S. Kim, Y. Chae and W.S. Chae, Anal. Sci. Technol., 34(3), 128-133 (2021).
8
8. J. Yen, D. Leber and L. Pibida, ‘Comparing Instruments’, NIST Technical Note 2106, 2020.
9
9. D. C. Harris, ‘Quantitative Chemical Analysis’, 9th Ed., W.H. Freeman, New York, 2016.
10
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland-Altman_plot
11
11. J.M. Bland and D.G. Altman, J. Biopharm. Stat., 17, 571-582 (2007).
12
12. 공경애, “검사법 평가: 검사법 비교와 신뢰도 평가”, Ewha Med. J., 40(1), 9-16 (2017).
Other articles from this issue
- Regression model for the preparation of calibration curve in the quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of urinary methamphetamine, amphetamine and 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid using R
- A study on the distribution of latent fingerprints on paper knife sheaths
- Simultaneous determination of 11-nor-Δ9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-nor-Δ9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol-glucuronide in urine samples by LC-MS/MS and its application to forensic science
- Validation of acid-base titration equivalence between spectroscopic titrator (SPT) and conventional titrators
- Fabrication and application of cell-based microfluidic chip for eye-irritation test of chemicals
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.