바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Lung Cancer Screening with Low-dose Computed Tomography

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2004, v.57 no.2, pp.118-124

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for men and women in the industrialized world. It is desirable to detect disease at a stage when it is not causing symptoms and when control or cure is possible. If the screening test detects patients with the disease at an early stage, they can be examined to confirm the diagnosis and intervention can alter the natural history of the disease.The results of screening programs designed to detect early lung cancer using either conventional chest radiograph or sputum cytology are disappointing for a diagnostic screening test. Because of advances in helical CT imaging techniques, screening for lung cancer has been suggested as a possible method of improving outcome. Findings in recent publications suggest that substantial dose reduction is possible in chest CT. The advantages of low-dose CT are more sensitive than chest radiograph for detecting small pulmonary nodules that may be lung cancers, shorter scanning time than conventional chest CT scan without intravenous contrast injection, cheaper cost than standard CT, low radiation dose. However, the true clinical significance of the small tumors found by screening is still unknown, and their effect on mortality awaits future investigation. Furthermore, in addition to detecting an increased number of lung cancers, low-dose CT found at least one indeterminate nodule in many of all screened patients. The majority should be benign but evaluation of all these indeterminate nodules is not a trivial problem in routine practice. In conclusion, lung cancer screening with low-dose CT is a complex subject. The true effectiveness of lung cancer screening (a reduction in mortality from lung cancer) with low-dose CT can be determined through well-designed randomized control trials with enrolment of appropriate subjects. (Tuberc Respir Dis 2004; 57:118-124)

keywords
Lung neoplasms, Cancer screening, Computed tomography (CT).

Reference

1.

(2000) Cancer statistics,

2.

(2002) Epidemiology of lung cancer in Korea,

3.

(2001) A Consensus Statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology:Screening for Lung Cancer with Helical Computed Tomography,

4.

(1996) The National Cancer Data Base report on lung cancer,

5.

(1997) Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer,

6.

(1992) The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer,

7.

(1988) Prognostic implications of the interꠀ national staging system for lung cancer,

8.

(1998) Prognostic assessment of 1310 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent complete resection from 1980 to 1993,

9.

(1995) Survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer,

10.

(2000) Results of surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer:validation of the new postoperative pathological TNM classification,

11.

(2000) Correlation of tumor size and survival in patients with Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer,

12.

(1988) Cancer screening degrees of proof and practical application,

13.

(1997) Screening for disease,

14.

(1974) The Philadelphia Pulmonary Neoplasm Research Project:early roentgenographic appearance of bronchogenic carcinoma,

15.

An evaluation of radiologic and cytologic screening for the early detection of lung cancer a cooperative pilot study of the American Cancer Society and the Veterans Administration,

16.

(1982) Results of lung cancer screening programs in Japan,

17.

(1968) South London Lung Cancer Study,

18.

(amrevrespirdis1984) results of the initial radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study,

19.

(amrevrespirdis1984) results of the initial radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Ketterring study,

20.

(amrevrespirdis1984) results of the initial radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic Study,

21.

(1986) Survival ad mortality from lung cancer in a screened population:The Johns Hopkins study,

22.

Results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia,

23.

Screening for lung cancer A critique of the Mayo lung project,

24.

(1995) Chest x- ray screening improves outcome in lung cancer. A reappraisal of randomized trials on lung cancer screening,

25.

(1997) Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view,

26.

(1996) Peripheral lung cancer:screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography,

27.

(1998) Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner,

28.

(1999) Early lung cancer action project:overall design and findings from baseline screening,

29.

(2000) Lung cancer screening: low-dose CT. Presented at the Society of Thoracic Radiology Meeꠀting,

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases