바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Information and Communications Technology, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emission Levels: The Case of South Korea

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.6, pp.7-15
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.6.201206.7
Lee, Jung-wan
Unger, Barry

Abstract

The paper deals with the impact of information and communications technology on carbon emissions and economic growth in South Korea. The quarterly time series data from the first quarter of 1970 to the third quarter of 2010 (163 observations) are collected and retrieved from the Bank of Korea database. The paper examines long-run equilibrium relationships using cointegration techniques and Granger causality with vector error correction models. In directional causality tests, information and communications technology shows highly significant positive effects on economic growth and marginal effect on carbon emissions. Carbon emissions and economic growth exhibit an inverse relationship with each other; that is, carbon emissions have an inverse relation to economic growth and economic growth does not significantly affect carbon emissions in South Korea. We also note possible implications regarding growth policies and the information communications technology and "green" technology sectors for economies in the range represented by Korea's 1970 - 2010 data.

keywords
green growth, green-tech, environmental management, information communications technology, economic growth, carbon emissions

Reference

1.

Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S. & Tunc, G. I. (2009), “The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve?”, Energy Policy, 37, 861–867.

2.

Al-mutawkkil, A., Heshmati, A. & Hwang, J.-S. (2009), “Development of telecommunication and broadcasting infrastructure indices at the global level”, Telecommunications Policy, 33, 176-199.

3.

Ang, J. B. (2007), “CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France”, Energy Policy, 35, 4772-4778.

4.

Apergis, N. & Payne, J. E. (2010), “The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States”, Energy Policy, 38, 650–655.

5.

Arvanitis, S. & Loukis, E. N. (2009), “Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity: A comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland”, Information Economics and Policy, 21, 43-61.

6.

Bowden, N. & Payne, J. E. (2009), “The causal relation-ship between U.S. energy consumption and real output: A disaggregated analysis”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 180-188.

7.

Carayannis, E. G. & Popescu, D. (2005), “Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries”, Technovation, 25, 1-14.

8.

Coondoo, D. & Dinda, S. (2002), “Causality between income and emission: A country group specific econometric analysis”, Ecological Economics, 40, 351-367.

9.

Coondoo, D. & Dinda, S. (2008), “The carbon dioxide emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns”, Ecological Economics, 65, 375–385.

10.

Cronin, F. J., Parker, E. B., Colleran, E. K. & Gold, M. A. (1991),“Telecommunications infrastructure and economic growth. Ananalysis of causality”, Telecommunications Policy, 15, 529–535.

11.

Daveri, F. & Silva, O. (2004), “Not only Nokia: what Finland tells us about new economy growth”, Economic Policy, 19, 117-163.

12.

Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.

13.

Dinda, S. & Coondoo, D. (2006), “Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis”, Ecological Economics, 57, 167–181.

14.

Dinda, S. (2004), “A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve”, Ecological Economics, 53, 403–413.

15.

Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J. & Stock, J. H. (1996), “Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root”, Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

16.

Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987), “Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing”, Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

17.

Ghosh, S. (2010), “Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach”, Energy Policy, 38, 3008-3014.

18.

Granger, C. W. J. (1988), “Some recent developments in a concept of causality”, Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199–211.

19.

Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1995), “Economic growth and the environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.

20.

Huang, B.-N., Hwang, M.-J. & Yang, C.-W. (2008), “Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: a dynamic panel data approach”, Ecological Economics, 67, 41–54.

21.

Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models”, Econometrica, 59, 1551–1580.

22.

Keppler, J. H. & Mansanet-Bataller, M. (2010), “Causalities between CO2, electricity, and other energy variables during phase I and phase II of the EU ETS”, Energy Policy, 38, 3329-3341.

23.

Koutroumpis, P. (2009), “The economic impact of broadband on growth: A simultaneous approach”, Telecommunications Policy, 33, 471-485.

24.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y.-C.(1992), “Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against thealternative of a unit root”, Journal of Econometrics, 54,159-178.

25.

Lam, P.-L. & Shiu, A. (2010), “Economic growth, telecommunications development and productivity growth of the telecommunications sector: Evidence around the world”, Telecommunications Policy, 34, 185-199.

26.

Laursen, K. (2004), “New and old economy: The role of ICT in structural change and economic dynamics”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15, 241-243.

27.

Lee, C.-C. & Lee, J.-D. (2009), “Income and CO2 emissions: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests”, Energy Policy, 37, 413–423.

28.

Lipsey, R. G. & Carlaw, K. I. (2004), “Total factor productivity and the measurement of technological change”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 1118 -1150.

29.

Luzzati, T. & Orsini, M. (2009), “Natural environment and economic growth: Looking for the energy-EKC”, Energy, 34, 291– 300.

30.

Mackinnon, J. G. (1996), “Numerical distribution functions for unit root and co-integration tests”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601-618.

31.

Mackinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A. & Michelis, L. (1999), “Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for co-integration”, Journal of Applied Econometrics,14, 563-577.

32.

Managi, S. & Jena, P. R. (2008), “Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India”, Ecological Economics, 65, 432–440.

33.

Martinez-Zarzoso, I. & Bengochea-Morancho, A. (2004), “Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2”, Economics Letters, 82, 121–126.

34.

Meng, Q. & Li, M. (2002), “New economy and ICT development in China”, Information Economics and Policy, 14, 275-295.

35.

Newey, W. & West, K. (1994), “Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation”, Review of Economic Studies, 61, 631-653.

36.

Ng, S. & Perron, P. (2001), “Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power”, Econometrica, 69, 1519-1554.

37.

Niu, S., Ding, Y., Niu, Y., Li, Y. & Luo, G. (2011), “Economic growth, energy conservation and emissions reduction: A comparative analysis based on panel data for 8 Asian-Pacific countries”, Energy Policy, 39, 2121-2131.

38.

Pao, H.-T. & Tsai, C.-M. (2010), “CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries”, Energy Policy, 38, 7850-7860.

39.

Phillips, P. & Perron, P. (1988), “Testing for a unit root in time series regression”, Biometrica, 75, 335–346.

40.

Phillips, P. & Ouliaris, S. (1990), “Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration”, Econometrica, 58, 165–193.

41.

Plepys, A. (2002), “Sustainability in the Information Society: The grey side of ICT”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 509-523.

42.

Schneider, S. H., Easterlig, W. & Mearns, L. O. (2000),“Adaptation: Sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climate changes”, Climatic Change, 45,203-221.

43.

Soytas, U. & Sari, R. (2009), “Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member”, Ecological Economics, 68, 1667–1675.

44.

Soytas, U., Sari, R. & Ewing, B. T. (2007), “Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States”, Ecological Economics, 62, 482–489.

45.

Stern, D. I. (2004), “The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve”, World Development, 32, 1419–1439.

46.

Swart, R., Robinson, J. & Cohen, S. (2003), “Climate change and sustainable development: expanding the options”, Climate Policy, 3(S1), S19-S40.

47.

Thompson, H. G., Jr. & Garbacz, C. (2007), “Mobile, fixed line and Internet service effects on global productive efficiency”, Information Economics and Policy, 19, 189-214.

48.

Van Ark, B. (2002), “Measuring the New Economy: An International Comparative Perspective”, Review of Income and Wealth, 48, 1- 14.

49.

Wilbanks, T. (2003), “Integrating climate change and sustainable development in a place-based context”, Climate Policy, 3(S1), S147-S154.

50.

Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2007), “Another look at the relationship between telecommunications investment and economic activity in the United States”, International Economic Journal, 21, 199–205.

51.

Yoo, S.-H. & Kwak, S.-J. (2004), “Information technology and economic development in Korea: A causality study”, International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 57–67.

52.

Zhang, X.-P. & Cheng, X.-M. (2009), “Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China”, Ecological Economics, 68, 2706-2712.

The Journal of Distribution Science