- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
An Exploratory Study of the Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Buying Intention in Mobile Service
An Exploratory Study of the Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Buying Intention in Mobile Service
Lee, Young-Chul (Dept. of Distribution Management, Jang An University)
Abstract
Purpose - The main purpose of this study is to find consumers' usage behavior in mobile services. To achieve these research goals, we empirically estimate the relationship between characteristics related to the use and provision of mobile services and factors influencing consumers' intentions. Research design / data / methodology - This study based on TAM, in which behavior is seen as a consequence of affect and intentions and used the theory of consumption values which is a means of explaining user decisions to employ a utilitarian and hedonic facet using by smart phone. Results - The result of the study verified that specific factors, such as expectations about pleasure and monetary value, had the biggest influence on the service usage pattern of mobile consumers. And typically, when consumers are expected to monetary damages, it will be avoided. However, in result of this study, it was found that mobile service users pay a high cost, but they are in pursuit of pleasure and fun. Conclusions - These results, a variety of applications in the mobile service are being provided to users. As information technology has developed, companies should have providing diverse application programs and good quality of services with advanced information technology.
- keywords
- Mobile Service, Utilitarian and Hedonic Value, Attitude, Buying Intention
참고문헌
Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E. (2000), “Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–94.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs”, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R. & Griffin, M. (1994), “Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value”. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656.
Babin, B. & Attaway, J. (2000), “Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer”, Journal of Business Research, 49, 91–9.
Batra, R. & Ahtola, O.T. (1991), “Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes”, Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159–70.
Bridges, E. & Florsheim, R. (2008), “Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: the online experience”, Journal of Business Research, 61, 309–14.
Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. and Carson, S. (2001), “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior”, Journal of Retailing, 77, 511–35.
Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K. & Hult, G.T. M. (2000), “Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments”, Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–18.
Davis, D.F., Bagozzi, P.R. & Warshaw, R.P. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Dhar, R. & Wertenbroch, K. (2000), “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60–1.
Fishbein, M. (1980), “A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications”, Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 65–16.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–60.
Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995), “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly,” 19(2), 213–36.
Gummerus, Johanna & Pihlstrom, M. (2011), “Context and mobile services’ value-in-use”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 521–533.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, A.L. & Tatham, R.L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th Edition. Pearson. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Hirschman, E. & Holbrook, M.B. (1982), “Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions”, Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.
Hong, S.J. & Tam, K.Y. (2006), “Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services”, Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162–79.
Jones, M., Reynolds, K. and Arnold, M. (2006), “Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: investigating differential effects on retail outcomes”, Journal of Business Research, 59, 974–81.
Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C. & Gupta, S. (2007), “Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation”, Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111–126.
Kim, B. & Han, I. (2009), “What drives the adoption of mobile data services? An approach from a value perspective”, Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 35–45.
McDougall, G.H.G. & Levesque, T. (2000), “Customer satisfaction with services: put- ting perceived value into the equation”, Journal of Services Marketing, 14(5), 392–410.
Noble, S., Griffith, D. and Weinberger, M. (2005), “Consumer derived utilitarian value and channel utilization in a multi-channel retail context”, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1643–651.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. NewYork: MacGraw Hill.
Oh, Young sam & Choi, Tae Sung, (2010), “Usability considerations in Quality of Service Metrics for Mobile Service Quality”, Journal of Service Management, 11(2), 167-191.
Pihlstrom, M. & Brush, G.J. (2008), “Comparing the perceived value of information and entertainment mobile services”, Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 732–755.
Pahnila, S. & Warsta, J. (2010), “Online shopping viewed from a habit and value perspective”, Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(6), 621-632.
Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations (4th. ed.), NewYork:- The Free Press.
Sawng, Yeong-Wha, Kim, Seung-Ho, Lee, Jungmann and Oh, Young Sam (2011), “Mobile Service Usage Behavior in Korea: An Empirical Study on Consumer Acceptance of Innovative Technologies”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(1), 151-173
Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. & Gross, B.L. (1991), “Why we buy what we buy: theory of consumption values”, Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–70.
Sweeney, J.C. & Lapp, W. (2001), “Critical service quality encounters on the Web: an exploratory study”, Journal of Services Marketing, 18(4), 276–289.
Turel, Ofir, Serenko, Alexander & Bontis, Nick (2010), “User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective”, Journal of Information & Management, 44, 53-59.
Triandis, H.C. (1980), “Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior” Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979. Lincoln, NE:- University of Nebraska Press, 195–259.
Turel, O., Serenko, A. & Bontis, N., (2007), “User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: deconstructing perceived value”, Information & Management, 44(1), 63–73.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Vlachos, P.A. & Vrechopoulos, A.P. (2008), D”eterminants of behavioral intentions in the mobile internet services market”, Journal of Services Marketing, 22(4), 280–291.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence”, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–2.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수