바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

A Study of the Impacts of Strategic Orientation on the Performance in Technology-based Start-ups

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2013, v.11 no.10, pp.37-45
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jds.2013.vol11.no10.37.
Jang, Dong-Kwan
Song, In-Am
Hwang, Hee-Joong

Abstract

Purpose - Appropriate response to the fast changing economic environment determines SMEs' competiveness in the era of globalization and open market and, therefore, government policies to strengthen SME's competitiveness will be very important in the future. It is time to investigate the element of strategic orientation that is necessary for strengthening the competitiveness of SMEs, and its effect on the success of a business start-up. This study analyzes the network orientation in addition to existing strategic orientation, and focuses on price and quality management capability as mediators for strategic orientation and outcomes of business start-ups. Research design/data/methodology - The orientations of technology-based business founders were classified into market, technology, network, and entrepreneurial orientation. We then investigated the effect of these orientations on product price and quality management capability, as well as the influence of price and quality management capability on the outcome of a business start-up. This study is based on the nation-wide survey of the founders and members of technology-based business establishments. The survey was administered to 300 selected companies via email for a period of one month, at the end of which 175 companies replied with valid answers. Further, for effective and objective research, we used SPSS 14.0 and Amos 7.0 for structural equation modeling assumptions and hypothesis verification. Results - Except for entrepreneurial orientation, the other three orientations, namely, technology, market, and network orientations, affect the price management capability according to our results. The price management capability relates significantly with the sales and customer satisfaction. Especially, technology orientation is the core competency of start-ups that affects price and quality management capabilities. However, technology and entrepreneurial orientation do not influence the outcome of business start-ups, but affect their quality management capabilities. Conclusions - This study confirms that the strategic orientation affects product price as well as quality management capabilities, to introduce new products and achieve successful outcomes. In conclusion, new business founders face the dilemma of trade-off between price and quality in the planning stage of new product development. In particular, price management capability directly affects the outcome. Therefore, price management is more important for a successful start-up than quality management. Especially, during the initial stages of starting up a new business, price management capability entails following the market-leading company, or price penetration strategy. In this stage, price management is dependent on the information from outside rather than on the founder's decision, and it directly affects sales performance and customer satisfaction. In contrast, quality management capability is directly related to the technology capability and market experience of founders. In this case, subjective and proactive decision making is required for differentiation and development of demand in the niche market, which does not directly influence the sales performance and customer satisfaction.

keywords
Strategic Orientation, Technology-based Start-ups, Price Management Capabilities, Quality Management Capabilities

Reference

1.

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74.

2.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

3.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.

4.

Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.

5.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

6.

Hakala. H. (2011). Strategic Orientations in Management Literature: Three Approaches to Understanding the Interaction between Market, Technology, Entrepreneurial and Learning Orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 199-217.

7.

Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why Some New Product are More Successful than Others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375.

8.

Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1986). Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 273-293.

9.

Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.

10.

Hong, Jin-Hwan (2009). Market Orientation, Entrepreneurship Orientation, and New Product Performance in SMEs. Seoul, Korea: Master's thesis in Graduate School of Chung-Ang University.

11.

Hwang, Hee-Joong (2012). The Effect of Education Service Quality on the Education Service Repurchase Intention - Education Service Price Fairness as Mediator. Daehan Journal of Business, 25(1), 1-19.

12.

Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1990). Market Orientation : The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-18.

13.

Jeong, Dae-Yong, & Park, Gyeong-Lim(2011). The Effects of Social Network and Self-Efficacy on Entrepreneurial Activities mediated by the Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Korea Entrepreneurship, 5(4), 115-139.

14.

Jeong, Duck-Hwa (2012). The Effects of Technology Orientation on Product Quality, Technological Capability, Innovation Speed and NP Performance: Moderating Effect of Order of Market Entry. Journal of Marketing, 20(3), 129-153.

15.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). MARKETING MANAGEMENT (12th Edition). New Jersey, US: Prentice-Hall.

16.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2007), FRAMEWORK FOR MARKETING MANAGEMENT (3rd Edition). New Jersey, US: Prentice-Hall.

17.

Kwon, Mee-Yong, & Jung, Hea-Joo (2012). The Effect of Entrepreneurs' Characteristic, Technological Capabilities and Network on Firm Performance of Technology-based Start-ups. Research of Business Venturing, 7(1), 7-18.

18.

Lee, Do-Hyeong (2012). The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Innovation Performance-The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Journal of Business Research, 27(2), 279-302.

19.

Lee, Il-Hwan, Han, Joo-Hee, & Hwang, Kum-Joo (2010). An Empirical Study on the New Product Performance and Entrepreneurship Intention between Strategic Orientation and Innovation Climate in Venture business CEO. Advancing Small Enterprise Innovation Research (JSBI), 14(4), 49-71.

20.

Lee, In-Woo (2009). An Empirical Study on the Technological-orientation & Market-orientation of Startup Enterprises and Their Effect on Managerial Performance. Seoul, Korea: Master's thesis in Graduate School of Gyeong-Hee University.

21.

Lee, Yong-Duck (2010). Technology Commercialization. Seoul, Korea: Du Nam press.

22.

Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2006). The Role of Market and Entrepreneurship Orientation and Internal Control in the New Product Development Activities of Chinese Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 336-347.

23.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.

24.

Miller, D., & Frisen, P. (1982). Strategic-Marketing and Environment : The Third Link. Strategic Science, 29(7), 770-790.

25.

Moon, Yoon-Ji, & Kim, Jeong-Yoon (2011). The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation and Performance in the Firm Formation : The Moderating Effect of Industry Types. Advancing Small Enterprise Innovation Research (JSBI), 14(3), 25-47.

26.

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20-35.

27.

Park, Jea-wan, Kim, Jae-o, & Yoon, In-heol (2011). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Marketing Orientation on the Innovation Success and Performance in Firms. Research of Business Education, 25(2), 211-243.

28.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York, US: Free Press.

29.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990), The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 66, 79-91.

30.

Robinson, A. G., & Stern, S. (1997). Corporate Creativity: How Improvement and Innovation Actually Happen, Developing Market Orientation: An Organizational Strategy Perspective. San Francisco, US : Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

31.

Ruekert, R. W. (1992). Developing Market Orientation: An Organizational Strategy Perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 225-245.

32.

Salavou, H. (2005). Do Customer and Technology Orientations Influence Product Innovation in SMEs? Some New Evidence from Greece. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3), 307-338.

33.

Schilling, Melissa A. (2010). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (Third Edition). New York, US : McGraw-Hill, lnc.

34.

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A Social Capital Theory of Careers Success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.

35.

Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation - Performance Relationship?. Journal of Marketing, 58, 46-55.

36.

Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Customer-led and Market-oriented : Let’s not Confuse the Two. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1001-1006.

37.

Song, In-Am, Yoon, Myeong-Suk, Kim, Won-Kyeom, & Cheon, Myoung-Hoon (2006). Case of the Consumer Behavior. Seoul, Korea : Dea Kyoung Press.

38.

Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship : Entrepreneurial Management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17-27.

39.

Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-Up Ventures: Towards the Prediction of Initial Success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230.

40.

Ulrich, Karl T., & Eppinger, Steven D. (1999). Product Design and Development. New York, US : McGraw-Hill, lnc.

41.

Urban, Glen L., & Hauser, John R. (1993). Design and Marketing of New Products. (Second Edition). Seoul, Korea : SIGMA PRESS. 21-25.

42.

You, Pil-Hwa, Simon , Hermann, & Pasnahart, Martin (2012), Management of Price. Seoul, Korea : Press of Park Young Sa.

43.

Venkatrama, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research : A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 801-814.

44.

Vorhies, D. W., & Harker M. (2000). The Capabilities and Performance Advantages of Market Driven Firms: An Empirical Investigation. Australian of Marketing, 25(2), 145-171.

45.

Zhou, K. Z,, Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). TheEffects of Strategic Orientations on Technology and Market-based Breakthrough Innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(21), 42-60.

The Journal of Distribution Science