바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Analysis of Purchase Behaviors of Department Store Users based on Types of Preference for Luxury Brands

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2013, v.11 no.10, pp.5-15
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jds.2013.vol11.no10.5.
Sun, Zhong-Yuan
Na, Seung-Hwa

Abstract

Purpose - With the increase in fervor to purchase luxury brands, new social problems have arisen, such as excessive preoccupation with luxury brands and high preference for forged luxury goods. Therefore, the issues related to luxury brands, termed "Luxury Syndrome," have emerged as an area of great interest for researchers and practitioners. However, previous studies neglect to categorize this preference for luxury brands. Therefore, this study aims to identify the different purchasing behaviors of consumers using the types of luxury brands preferences as parameters. Research design, data, and methodology - This study arranges a causal relationship model assuming that purchase behaviors positively (+) affect typified preference for luxury brands and purchase intentions. We administered a questionnaire survey to the purchasers who bought luxury brands from department stores to secure additional data necessary to verify the hypotheses in this study. We then processed the data using SPSS 19.0. We further analyzed the basic data using frequency and descriptive statistical analysis, and verified the measurement tools through feasibility and reliability analyses. Moreover, this study uses multiple regression analysis to verify the hypotheses. Further, this study tests the path effect between luxury brand purchase attitude and purchase behavior, with non-intrinsic preference and intrinsic preference as the mediating variables. Results - Based on the results, the impact of tendencies of conspicuous consumption and self-monitoring on non-intrinsic preference was significantly positive (+), while the impact of tendencies of pursuit of a reference group, conspicuous consumption, and self-monitoring on intrinsic preference and purchase intentions was significantly positive (+). Further, non-intrinsic and intrinsic preferences positively (+) influence purchase intentions and the impact of non-intrinsic preference took an absolute portion. However, the tendency of dependence on brands negatively (-) impacts purchase intentions. The results showed that self-monitoring and conspicuous consumption tendencies have greater effect on purchase intention, which is mediated by non-intrinsic preference. In contrast, reference group following tendency has a greater effect on purchase intention, which is mediated by intrinsic preference. Conclusions - Based on the results, the study verifies that the consumption of luxury brands in Korea has not yet entered the settling period. The tendency for conspicuous consumption and the tendency for pursuit of the reference group were relatively important aspects for the consumers who prefer luxury brands non-intrinsically and intrinsically, respectively. Especially, it was found that the purchase intentions for forged brands originate from the tendency to depend on brands. Based on these findings, this study suggests the measures to develop and mature the luxury brands market, and reinforce marketing performance at the three levels, that is, government, distributors, and manufacturers. The luxury brands manufacturers should devote themselves to the production and design of products to catch the attention of mature consumers of luxury brands. The luxury brands distributors should then raise the level of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) for opinion leaders. Finally, the Government should prepare effective policies for the development of luxury brands and provide a variety of economic support.

keywords
Luxury Brands, Non-intrinsic Preference, Intrinsic Preference, Purchase Attitude, Purchase Intentions

Reference

1.

Ahn, Kwang-Ho, & Im, Mi-Wha(2008). The Effect of Product Benefit on Brand Attachment and Brand Commitment: the moderating effect of product type and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Studies, 19(1), 169-189.

2.

Cailleux, H., Mignot, C., & Kapferer, J.(2009). Is CRM for luxury brands?. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5/6), 406-412.

3.

Cho, Ah-Ra, & Lee, Yoon-Jung(2013). The Influence of Consumers' Need for Uniqueness and Conspicuous Consumption Tendency on Their Attitude toward and Intention to Purchase Fashion Collaboration Products. Korea design forum, 38, 355-366.

4.

Choi, Eun-Jung, Hong, Kyung-Hee, & Lee, Yoon-Jung(2010). Korean Consumers' Perceptions toward Luxury Products. Journal of Fashion Business, 14(5), 195-215.

5.

Choi, Young-Lae, & Lee, Jae-Hee(2011). The Effects of Consciousness of Social Position and Dignity of Participants in Leisure Sports on Conspicuous Leisure Consumption. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 50(4), 1-11.

6.

Dubois, B., & P. Duquesne(1993). The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-44.

7.

Istyle 24(2013). Italian Luxury Brands Losing Popularity in Italy but Rising in Korea. Retrieved Jun 30, 2013, from http://zine.istyle24. com/Fashion/FashionView.aspx?Idx=9352&Menu=12&_C _=23680.

8.

Jacoby, Jacob(1971). Personality and innovation proneness. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(5), 422-447.

9.

Joo, Ji-Hyuk(2012). Differences of Purchasing Luxury Brand between Female and Male: Focusing on Conspicuous Consumption and Influence of Reference Group. Journal of Advertising, 94, 70-93.

10.

Jung, Ji-Won, Jung, Sun-Hui, & Cha, Gyeong-Uk(2003). Materialism, Conspicuous Consumption, and Preference for Imported Luxury Brands Among College Students. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 21(5), 181-192.

11.

Kang, Bo-Kyung, & Hwang, Jin-Sook(2011). The Combination of Product Attributes in Luxury Fashion Brands. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 13(2), 89-101.

12.

Kapferer, J., & Bastien, V.(2009), The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5/6), 311-322.

13.

Kim, Hyun-Sook, Moon, Hee-Kang, Choo, Ho-Jung, & Yoon, Nam-Hee(2011). The Effect of Fashion Luxury Consumption Values on the Intention to Maintain Brand Relationships: Differences among Segmented Markets Based on Purchasing Patterns. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(4), 408-420.

14.

Kim, Hwa-Dong(2012). The Effect of Luxury Image on Brand Preference and Purchase Intention: Focus on Purchase Situation according to Consumers' Prior Knowledge and Perceived Risk. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 13(3), 421-441.

15.

Kim, Mi-Sook, & An, Soo-Kyung(2010). Brand Awareness, Attributes and Purchase Behviors for Luxury Products in the Age of McLuxury. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 18(1), 133-149.

16.

Kim, Mi-Song, Choi, Hyung-Kyu, & Kim, Dong-Hwan(2013). An Analysis of the Effects of Consumer Characteristics and Consumer Trust on Purchase Intention of Environment-friendly Agricultural Products. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(1), 45-53.

17.

Kim, Sung-Bae, & Bae, Il-Hyun(2005). A Study on the Antecedents and Consequence of Luxury Goods Preference: Focus on Luxury Goods Purchasing Customer in Department Store. Journal of Commodity Science & Technology, 23(2), 29-51.

18.

Kim, Yeong-Gyun(2010). Consumer Behavior. Seoul, Korea: Doonam Publishing, 193-194, 200-201, 323-324.

19.

Kwon, Min-Sung(2012). The Value Transition of the Demand for the Future Luxury Market. Journal of Digital Interaction Design, 11(3), 35-48.

20.

Lee, Byung-Kwan(2012). The Effect of Conspicuous Consumption by Golf Consumers' Chemyeon on Luxury Goods and Luxury Brands Purchasing Intention. The Korea Journal of Sports Science, 21(4), 635-644.

21.

Lee, Ga-Na, & Shin, Su-Yun(2012). Purchase Behaviors on Imported Fashion Luxury Brand's Bag according to the Types of Consumption Values of Female Consumers in 20's and 30's. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 14(4), 554-566.

22.

Lee, Hun-Yeong(2010). Marketing Research. Seoul, Korea: Cheongram Publishing, 314.

23.

Lee, June-Young, & Kim, Ran-Do(2007). Consumer Desire for Luxury Product : Applying the ‘Theory of Triangular Desire' to In-depth Interviews. Journal of Consumer Studies, 18(2), 41-58.

24.

Lee, Lyung-Kyung, Kweon, Soo-Ae, & Yoo, Joung-Ja(2010). Impact of Reference Groups on Buying Behavior of Adolescent Consumers when Purchasing Luxury Goods. The Korean Society of Fashion Design, 10(3), 1-20.

25.

Lee, Seung-Hee, Lee, Lang, & Jung, So-Yeon(2003). The Effects of Variables on Fashion Luxury Brand Purchasing Behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(11), 1241-1251.

26.

Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N. & Rigdon, E.(2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56.

27.

Nia, A. and J. Zaichkowsky(2000). Do Counterfeits Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brand. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), 15-36.

28.

Olson, J. C. & Jacoby, J.(1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 167-169.

29.

Park, Hye-Ok, Na, June-Hee, & Lee, Yong-Hak(2010). The Impact of Consumer's Consumption Propensity on Brand Loyalty: Brand Identification vs. Conformity. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 21(5), 225-246.

30.

Samuelson, William, & Zeckhauser, Richard (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.

31.

SBS(2013). Kidney Traded to Buy a Luxury Bag. Retrieved Jun 23, 2013, from http://sbscnbc.sbs.co.kr/read.jsp?pmArticleId=10000530091.

32.

Shavitt, S., Lowrey, T., & Han, S. (1992). Attitude Functions in Advertising: The Interactive Role of Products and Self-Monitoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 337-364.

33.

Shin, Hye-Na, Lee, Moon-Kyu, & Shin, Sung-Hye (2011). Elements of Luxury Brands and Determinants of Brand Preferences: A Focus on the Fashion Luxury Brands. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 29(2), 13-28.

34.

Snyder, Mark (1974). Self Monitoring of Expressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.

35.

Snyder, M., & Gangstad, S.(1986). On the Nature of Self-Monitoring: Matters of Assesment, Matters of Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.

36.

Son, Il-Gwon (2004). 5 Conditions for Luxury Brands. Money Today, 10 September, 3-4, Seoul, Korea.

37.

Suh, Yong-Han, Oh, Hee-Sun, & Jeon, Min-Ji (2011). A Study on How Chemyon Influence Consuming Behaviors for the Luxuty Brands. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 13(1), 25-31.

38.

Sun, Zhong-Yuan (2009). A Study of factors affecting purchasing intention on counterfeit brands of young generation in China : Focused on university students in Beijing, Shanghai, Changchun, Qingdao regions. Mokpo, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Mokpo National University.

39.

Tynan, C., Mckechnie, S., & Chhuon, C. (2010). Co-creating value for luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1156-1163.

40.

Vigneron, Frank, & Johnson, W. (1999). A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 99(1), 56-73.

41.

Yonhap News(2013). Luxury Brand, ‘Hide the Logo’. Retrieved Jun 25, 2013, from http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2013/06/17/ 0200000000AKR20130617170100030.HTML? input=1179m.

The Journal of Distribution Science