바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

공익에 대한 소비자의 지각과 태도가 공익관련 마케팅캠페인에 대한 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

The Influence of Consumers' Perception and Attitude to Causes on Consumer Attitude toward a Cause-related Marketing Campaign

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2013, v.11 no.12, pp.63-69
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jds.2013.vol11.no12.63.
이은영 (School of Industrial Management, Korea University of Technology and Education)

Abstract

Purpose - Ethical consumption is the action of buying one product over another with an ethical idea in mind. It has gained in popularity since the 1990s with more emphasis being put on the power of consumer actions to create social, economic, and environmental change. Ethical consumption involves boycotts of certain products or brands as well as purchases linked to ethical issues. Cause-related marketing (the buying behavior of ethical consumption) involves a for-profit and non-profit entity teaming up to promote a product at the same time as promoting a social cause. Each time a consumer buys that product, a donation is made by the for-profit entity to the non-profit entity supporting the specific cause. Cause-related marketing has become a tremendously popular type of ethical consumption in recent years owing to its reputation of allowing companies to "do well by doing good." This study examines how consumers' perception of cause and attitude influence their attitude toward a cause-related marketing campaign and attempts to suggest implications for marketers. Research design, data, and methodology - First, this study was designed to examine the consumers' perception factors (cause involvement, attitude for cause, attitude for company and brand familiarity) in order to determine whether these factors have significantly affected consumers' attitude toward a cause-related marketing campaign. Second, this study developed a structural equation model and tested it empirically using survey data from 223 individual respondents. Respondents were undergraduate students in Chungnam. They were shown an existing real campaign message of cause-related marketing, and then filled out a questionnaire. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 17.0 programs. Results - The hypotheses were tested using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The study's results showed that brand familiarity, attitude to the company and attitude to the cause significantly affected consumers' attitude toward the cause-related marketing campaign and performance. In particular, attitude to the cause was significantly related to attitude and performance of the cause-related marketing campaign. However, the hypothesis about cause involvement was not supported with the results indicating that cause involvement did not affect consumers' attitude toward the cause-related marketing campaign. The findings underline the importance of consumer perceptions of the cause and the company and their attitude to the cause. They point to the importance of individual differences that influence consumer perceptions of the cause, the company and brand familiarity. Also of importance is the consumer's attitude to the cause. Conclusions - The findings suggest some practical implications in designing and implementing cause-related marketing campaigns. It is important to enhance brand familiarity and create a favorable attitude to the company and attitude to the cause before designing cause-related marketing campaigns. The rising popularity of cause-related marketing has been attributed to its potential to cut through advertising clutter. The findings in this study suggest that marketing campaigns supporting a cause make a difference.

keywords
Cause involvement, Brand Familiarity, Attitude to Company, Attitude to Cause, Cause-related Marketing Campaign

참고문헌

1.

Bagozzi, Richard & Yi, Youjae(1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

2.

Basil, D.Z. & Herr, P.M.(2006). Attitudinal Balance and Cause-related Marketing; An Empirical Application of Balance Theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 391-403.

3.

Berger, IE., Cunningham, P.H. & Kozinets, R.V.(1999). The Processing of Cause-related Marketing Claims; Cues, Biases, or Motivators?. In Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 491-497.

4.

Brown, T. J. & Dacin, P.A.(1997). The Company and The Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68-84.

5.

Cornwell, T. Bettina & Coote, Leonard V.(2005). Corporate Sponsorship of a Cause: The Role of Identification in Purchase Intent. Journal of Business Research, 58, 268-276.

6.

Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr.(1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(Feb), 64-73.

7.

Ellen, Pam Scholder, Mohr, L.A. & Webb, D.J.(2000). Charitable Programs and The Retailer; Do They Mix?. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393-406.

8.

Fazio, R.H., Powell, M.C. & Williams, C.J.(1989). The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 280-288.

9.

Grau, S. L., Garretson, J. A. & Pirsch, J.(2007). Cause-related Marketing; an Eexploratory Study of Campaign Donation Structures Issues. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 69-71.

10.

Gupta, S. & Pirsch J.(2006). The company-cause-consumer Fit Decision in Cause-related Marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314-326.

11.

Harrison, R., Newholm, T. & Shaw, D.(2005). The Ethical Consumer. Sage, London, 1-10.

12.

Hong, JongPil, & Jang, HyeYeon(2011). A Study on the Effects of Cause-related Advertising on Consumers’ Attitude toward the Ad and Sponsoring Company; Focusing on the Inter-Relationship between the Company, Cause, and Consumer. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 12(4), 771-798.

13.

Kim, EunHee(2012). Research on Practical Shopping Value and Consumer Attitudes on PB Products According to Perceived Quality. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(10), 35-43.

14.

Kim, MunJung, & Cho, YunGi(2008). A Study on Consumer Behavior Characteristic of Low Involvement Goods Purchasing. Journal of Distribution Science, 6(2), 81-93.

15.

Kline, R. B.(1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

16.

Kotler, P.(2007). CSR MARKETING. Korea; leadersbook.

17.

Lacey, Russell, Close, Angeline G. & Finney, R. Zachary(2009). The Pivotal Roles of Product Knowledge and Corporate Social Responsibility in Event Sponsorship Effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1222-1228.

18.

Lafferty, Barbara A.(2007). The Relevance of Fit in a Cause-Brand Alliances When Consumer Evaluate Corporate Credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1-7.

19.

Lee, D.H. & Olshavsky, R.W.(1994). Toward a Predictive Model of the Consumer Inference Process; the Role of Expertise. Psychology and Marketing, 11, 109-127

20.

Lee, EunYoung(2008). A Study on the Factors Influencing the Performance of Cause-related Marketing. Korean Journal of Aviation Management, 6(2), 123-137.

21.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumright, M. E. & Braig, B. M.(2004). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-supported Nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16-32.

22.

Low, W. & Davenport, E.(2007). To Boldly Go...Exploring Ethical Spaces to Re-politicise Ethical Consumption and Fair trade. Journal of Consumers Behavior, 6, 336-348.

23.

Maignan, I.(2001). Consumers' Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57-72.

24.

Meenaghan, T.(1991). The Role of Sponsorship in the Marketing Communications Mix. International Journal of Advertising, 10(1), 35-47.

25.

Nunnally, Jun C.(1967). Psychometric Theory. New-York : McGraw-Hill.

26.

Pracejus, John, W. & Olsen, G. D.(2004). The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-related Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57, 635-640.

27.

Ross, J.K., Patterson, L.T. & Stutts, M.A.(1992). Consumer Perceptions of Organizations that Use Cause-related Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93-98.

28.

Sohn, YoungSuk(2002). A Study on the Influencing Factors of Consumers' Attitude in Sports Sponsorship. Journal of Korean consumer research, 13(3), 121-150.

29.

Trimble, Carrie S. & Rifon, Nora J.(2006). Consumer Perceptions of Compatibility in Cause-related Marketing Messages. International Journal of Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(Feb), 29-47.

30.

Tsai, S.P.(2007). Message Framing Strategy for Brand Communication. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(3), 364-377.

31.

Uim, Ji-Yoon & Koo, Jang-Ok(2013). Trends in Cause-Related Marketing(CRM) Research: Content Analysis of Korean Journals from 2000 to 2012. Journal of Korean Corporate Management, 20(4), 155-174.

32.

Yoon, Nam-Soo, Kim, Jae-Yeong & Park, Young-Kyun(2011). The Impact of Price Discount on Perceived Value, Willingness to Buy, and Search Intentions according to the Level of Consumers' Involvement. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(1), 39-48.

33.

Youn, Seounmi & Kim, Hyuksoo(2008). Antecedents of Consumer Attitude toward Cause-related Marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123-137.

34.

Zaichkowsky JL.(1994). The Personal Involvement Inventory; Reduction and Revision. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-69.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)