바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Youth Startup Firms: A Case Study on the Survival Strategy for Creating Business Performance

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.6, pp.81-88
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.6.201406.81
Lee, Seung-Chang
Lim, Won-Ho
Suh, Eung-Kyo
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Entrepreneurship promotion is emerging as an important economic growth agenda. However, in Korea, entrepreneurship has weakened because of the collapse of the venture bubbles of the 2000s and the global economic recession in 2008, which have induced the business community to choose stability over risk. The Korean government has been implementing several support projects to inspire and promote youth entrepreneurship through various means including financial assistance; however, the perpetuation rate of young entrepreneurship is still low as compared to advanced economies such as the US and EU. This case study focuses on the Youth Start-Up Business Support Program of the Small & Medium Business Corporation, and explores practical alternatives. Further, it aims to suggest managerial factors and a conceptual model for change management factors affecting the business performance creation of a startup company, based on the Small and medium Business Corporation's young venture startup fund. Research design, data, and methodology - Many studies examine the current progress and issues of startup firms, for example, a lack of systematic cultivation of entrepreneurship and startup business training, lack of commercialization funding for youth startup businesses, lack of mentoring, and inadequate infrastructure. From prior research, we address four factors, namely, personal managerial capabilities, innovative business model, sufficient cash flow, and social network, affecting startup companies' business performance. This study involved a sample survey of 200 young entrepreneurs to investigate casual relations between the four factors and business performance. A regression analysis was used to verify the hypotheses. Results - First, in relation to differences in the founder's personal characteristics, age, sales amount, and number of employees significantly impact business performance. Second, regarding the causal relation between the four factors for creating business performance, an innovative business model and social networking have supported the hypotheses, revealing that the more that a start-up founder has an innovative business model and social networking, the more the start-up firms are likely to have better performance (e.g., sales volume, employment, ROE, ROI, etc.). Although the founder's competency and sufficient cash flow have no significant relationship with business performance, the mean value was higher performance for high founder's competency and sufficient cash flow. Conclusions - This study provides basic data on policy support strategies of the Small and Medium Business Corporation, to help young entrepreneurs achieve their start-up business goals. It shows that young entrepreneurship startup firms should strive to explore ideas to satisfy customers' needs, and that changes in customer value and the continuous innovation of business model differentiation are required to actively respond to change management. Moreover, at the infant startup stage, they should activate social network programs to share information, thereby offsetting resource scarcity and managing business risk. Further, the establishment of a long-term vision and the implementation of training programs in related specific fields should be supported to strengthen founders' personal capabilities.

keywords
Youth Startup Firm, Entrepreneurship, Korean Ventures and SMEs, Managerial Factors, Business Model

Reference

1.

Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge. MA: East Asia Publishing Company.

2.

Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., & Spector, B. (1990). Why change programs don't produce change. Harvard Business Review, 68(November–December), 158–166.

3.

Bin, B. S., & Park, J. K. (2002). An Empirical Study on the Success Factors of a Small Business Starting-up. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 24(3), 135-158

4.

Bird, B. J. (1993). Demographic approaches to entrepreneurship:The role of experience and background. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 1, 11-48.

5.

Chandler, G. N., & Jansen E. (1992). The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3), 223–236.

6.

Cho, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). A study on the activation plan of domestic franchise companies third party logistics. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 2(2), 15-24.

7.

Cooper, A. C. (1993). Challenges in Predicting New Firm Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 241-253.

8.

Duchesneau, D. A., & Gartner. W. (1990). A Profile of New Venture Success and Failure in an Emerging Industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 297-312.

9.

Han, J. H. (2013). Venture Creations & Management Strategy. Seoul, Korea : Hongmun Publishing.

10.

Hoselitz, B. F. (1952). Progress of underdeveloped areas. Chicago. IL.: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Hwang, B. W., Kim, J. H., & Bang, J. H. (2013). Impact of Youth Start-Up Business Incubating System On the Start-Up Business Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 149-160.

12.

Jang, D. K., Song, I. A., & Hwang, H. J. (2013). A Study of the Impacts of Strategic Orientation on the Performance in Technology-based Start-ups. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(1), 37-45

13.

Jarillo Mossi, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41.

14.

Jung. S. H., & Kim, H. Y. (2001). An Exploratory Study on Success Factors in Small Business Startups. Entrepreneurship and Venture, 8(2), 3-29.

15.

Kim, J. Y., Kwon, T. H., Kim, H. Y, Byun, Y. K., and Yoo, M. C. (2005). A Successful strategy of Startup Firms. Seoul, Korea: Sigma books.

16.

Kim, K. W. (2011). A study on the factors affecting the growth of venture firms: based on venture type. Korea development institute, Series 2011-14.

17.

Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewiez, J., & Marsden, P. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Anniversary revision of socialogy, 4, 455-484.

18.

Lee, J. W., & Chang, S. D. (1998). A Conceptual Study on the Success Factors of High-tech Venture. Entrepreneurship and Venture, 2, 69-95

19.

Lee, J. W. (1997). Venture Management. (ISBN: 8974421062)Seoul: Maeil Economy publishing.

20.

Liao, S, C, (2014), Building a Product Design of Innovative Strategy for Creating Enterprise Development, Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5-1, 17-25.

21.

Man, T., Lau, T., & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123-142.

22.

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ:Van No Strand. Policy. Chicago: Heller Institute for Small Business Policy.

23.

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future planning (2013), Major work plan of Ministry of Science. ICT and Future planning 2013, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future planning.

24.

Mitchell. J. C. (1969). Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

25.

OECD (2013). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013: Innovation for Growth. (ISSN:2072-5345) Retrived from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9213051e. pdf?expires=1402529956&id=id&accname=guest&checksu m=E688E859B73D59286CD8AD38DF323268

26.

Palmer, M. (1971). The application of psychological testing to entrepreneurial potential. California Management Review, 13(3), 38.

27.

Pickle, H. B. (1964). Personality and success: An evaluation of personal characteristics of successful small business managers. Small Business Research Series No. 4, Washington D.C.: U.S. governement printing office.

28.

Ronstadt, R. (1988). The Corridor Principle. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(1), 31-41.

29.

Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks:Toward a new paradigm for research. New York:Free Press

30.

Roure, J. B., & Keeley, R. H. (1990). Predictors of success in new technology based ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), 201-220.

31.

Rye, J. S., Swinney, J., Muske, G., & Zachary, R. K. (2012). Business Orientation, Goals and Satisfaction of Korean-American Business Owners. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 5-11.

32.

Siddiqui, M. A., & Majid, S. (2013). Exploring the Financing Gap Between Young Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(2), 5-15.

33.

Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-up ventures: toward the prediction of initial and success. Journal of Business Venture, 2(3), 215-230.

34.

Sutton, F. X. (1954). Achievement norms and the motivation of entrepreneurs. In entrepreneurs and economic growth, Cambridge, MA.: Social science research council and Harvard university research center in entrepreneurial history.

35.

Timmers, P. (1988). Business Models for electronic Markets, Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3-8.

36.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.

37.

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–89.

38.

Xaiver, S., Kelly, D., Kew, J., Herrington, M., & Vordewulbecke, A. (2012). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2012 Global report. Global Entrepreurship Research Association. 18-25.

The Journal of Distribution Science