바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of Education Service Quality on Relationship Management from the Service Distribution Perspective

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.3, pp.41-49
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.3.201503.41
Cho, Hyun-Jin
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Universities are placing a greater emphasis on relationship management as a source of competitive advantage due to increasingly competitive environments and social changes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationships among education service quality, relationship quality, and relationship performance from the perspective of service distribution. In other words, this study is focused on the role of education service quality with regard to relationship management. In this study, education service quality is divided into lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student-student interaction, facility welfare, and scholarship welfare quality components; relationship quality is composed of satisfaction and commitment; and relationship performance is divided into recommendation and defection intentions. Research design, data, and methodology - This study aims to identify how the various elements of education service quality affect satisfaction. Further, it aims to test the relationships among satisfaction, commitment, recommendation intentions, and defection intentions. Distribution and marketing students were randomly selected for the experiment. Out of the 380 administered questionnaires, a total of 361 respondents provided complete and usable data. The sample consisted of 232 males (64.3%) and 129 females (35.7%). The variables of the proposed model were measured through assessments that were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Using Lisrel 8.7, a structural model was analyzed and the path coefficients were estimated. Results - The overall fit of the model was acceptable (χ2=1121.8 (df=603, P=0.00), GFI=0.967, NFI=0.974, CFI=0.981, RMR=0.021). The results generally supported the hypothesized relationships of the proposed model, except for Hypothesis 1. First, lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student-student interaction, and facility welfare quality were revealed to have positive effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality had the strongest effects on satisfaction. However, scholarship welfare quality did not significantly affect satisfaction; this means that Hypothesis 3-2 was not supported. Second, satisfaction was positively related to commitment and recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Third, commitment was positively related to recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Conclusions - This study emphasizes the influence of education service quality on satisfaction in the long-term. In addition, this research has the following implications for university relationship management. First, the findings suggest that the various dimensions of education service quality have differing effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality are found to be the most important factors in increasing the level of satisfaction. Therefore, university managers need to prioritize enhancing lecture quality and upgrading educational facilities. Second, satisfaction also improves through job assistance systems and opportunities for social interactions. Therefore, university managers should reinforce their job skills programs and should provide opportunities for social relationships to develop. Finally, it is important for university managers to take a relationship approach to maximizing relationship performance. Therefore, university managers should work to increase student recommendations and prevent their defections based on satisfaction and commitment.

keywords
Education Service Quality, Relationship Quality, Relationship Performance

Reference

1.

Abdullah, F. (2006). The Development of HEdPERF: A New Measuring Instrument of Service Quality for the Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581.

2.

Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer Satisfaction, Market Share and Profitability: Findings From Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 53-66.

3.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

4.

Astin, A. (1993). What matters in colleges? four critical years revisited, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

5.

Bettencourt, L. A. (1997). Customer Voluntary Performance:Customer as Partners in Service Delivery. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 383-406.

6.

Bolton, R. N., & Lemon, K. N. (1999). A Dynamic Model of Customers' Usage of Services: Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 171-186.

7.

Brady, M. K., & Cronin Jr, J. J. (2001). Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34-49.

8.

Chang, Dae-Sung, Chae, Gyu-Jin, & Kim, Min-Su (2010). A Study of Service Encounter Type between Business Education Service and Students' Satisfaction and Loyalty in Korean Universities. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 23(2), 813-831.

9.

Cho, Ho-Hyeon, & Lim, Byung-Hak (2007). The Process Quality and the Outcome Quality of Educational Service in Higher Education System. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 25(3), 61-72.

10.

Cho, Hyun-Jin (2012a). The Effects of Service Quality on Shopping Value and Repatronage Intention: The Case of Specialty Coffee Shops. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(4), 21-28.

11.

Cho, Hyun-Jin (2012b). The Effects of Relational Factors on Referral Intention in the Beauty Service Industry. Business Education Review, 27(3), 189-207.

12.

Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209.

13.

Fullerton, G. (2003). When does Commitment Lead to Loyalty?. Journal of Service Research, 5(4), 333-344.

14.

Fullerton, G. (2005). The Service Quality-Loyalty Relationship in Retail Services: Does Commitment Matter?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(2), 99-111.

15.

Fullerton, G. (2011). Creating Advocates: The Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(1), 92-100.

16.

Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70-87.

17.

Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1999). A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 223-238.

18.

Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1995). The Structure of Commitment in Exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59(January), 78-92.

19.

Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment as Potential Antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.

20.

Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2007). What Accounts for Students'Loyalty? Some Field Study Evidence. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2), 126-143.

21.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Lager, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modelling and Managing Student Loyalty: An Approach Based on the Concept of Relationship Quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 331-344.

22.

Hong, Song-Hon (2011). A Study on the Evaluation Factors on Korean University Education for Promoting Educational Service Export from the Perspective of Chinese Student in Korea. International Commerce and Information Review, 13(4), 463-484.

23.

Hwang, Hee-Joong (2012). The Effect of Education Service Quality on the Education Service Repurchase Intention -Education Service Price Fairness as Mediator-. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(1), 1-19.

24.

Hwang, Hyun-Joo (2004). Study on Measuring on Quality of University Services - With Emphasis on the Relationship with the Students' Intention of Re-Enrollment. The Journal of Korean Education, 31(1), 385-419.

25.

Jang, Gui-Kyung, Hong, Seong-Heon, & Moon, Seok-Hwan (2010). Chinese Students' Evaluations on the Education Service Quality of Korean Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Decision Science, 18(1), 21-40.

26.

Kang, Man-Su, & Park, Sang-Kyu (2011). Assessing the Effects of Service Quality on Student Satisfaction, Trust, Commitment and Loyalty: The Case of University Education. The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management, 13(1), 129-149.

27.

Kim, Hyeon-Cheol, Ma, Jong-Sig, & Lee, Sang-Hyeop (2013). The Moderating Effect of Educational Commitment in the Relationship between Functional and Technical Quality of Educational Service and Customer Loyalty. Business Education Review, 28(6), 575-598.

28.

Kim, In-Suk, & Jung, Joo-Young (2010). The Comparison Study between the Groups on Campus Life Satisfaction:Focusing on Difference between Seoul Metropolitan Area and non-Seoul Metropolitan Area. The Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 241-260.

29.

Kim, Sung-Sik (2008). A Exploratory Study Withdrawal and Transfer of Korean College Students: The Influence of College-Choice Reason and Satisfaction Afterwards. The Journal of Korean Education, 35(1), 227-249.

30.

Ko, Jang-Wan, Park, Su-Mi, & Yu, Hyun-Sook (2014). An Analysis of the Structural Relationships between Student Learning Outcomes and Institutional Characteristics and Student Engagement. The Journal of Korean Education, 41(1), 167-195.

31.

Lee, Bong-Soo, & Han, Hong-Jin (2010). A Study on the Development of Instrument for Measuring the Educational Service Quality in International Trade Major. Korea Trade Review, 77-101.

32.

Lee, Hye-Mi, & Han, Jin-Su (2013). A Study on the Impacts of Educational Service Quality on Student Satisfaction, Intention to Recommend and Word-of-Mouth: Focusing on International Student in Universities of Seoul Region. Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 27(3), 55-76.

33.

Lee, Hyoung-Tak (2013). The Effect of University's Service on the University Customer's Citizenship Behaviors. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 26(4), 1011-1032.

34.

Lee, Yeong-Hee (2014). The Effects of Educational Service Quality on Relationship Quality and Customer Loyalty and Moderating Effects of School-grade. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 27(2), 263-284.

35.

Ministry of Education (2014), University Structure Reform Plan. Press Release, 29 January.

36.

Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors Affecting Trust in Market Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.

37.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing. 58(3). 20-38.

38.

Nesset, E., & Helgesen, Ø. (2009). Modelling and Managing Student Loyalty: A Study of a Norwegian University College. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 327-345.

39.

Odekerken-Schroder, G. (1999). The Role of the Buyer in Affecting Buyer-Seller Relationships: Empirical Studies in a Retail Context. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maastricht.

40.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of the Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

41.

Pollack, B. L. (2009). Linking the Hierarchical Service Quality Model to Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(1), 42-50.

42.

Price, L., & Arnould, E. J. (1999). Commercial Friendship:Service Provider-Client Relationships in Context. Journal of Marketing, 63, 38-56.

43.

Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The One Number You Need to Grow, Harvard Business Review, 81(December), 2-10.

44.

Sheth, J., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255-271.

45.

Shin, So-young, & Kwon, Soung-Youn (2013). A Study on the Development and Validity Verification of a Measurement Tool for Educational Satisfaction in University. Journal of Education Science, 44(3), 107-132.

46.

Sweeney, J., & Swait, J. (2008). The Effects of Brand Credibility on Customer Loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(3), 179-193.

47.

Verhoef, P. C., Franses, P. H., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The Effect of Relational Constructs on Customer Referrals and Number of Services Purchased From a Multiservice Provider: Does Age of Relationship Matter?. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 202-216.

48.

Yi, You-jae, & Lee, Cheong-Lim (2014). A Critical Review of Service Quality Research in Recent 10 years (2004-2013). Journal of Marketing Management Research, 19(2), 1-43.

49.

Yu, Jae-Gab (2013). A Study of Educational Service Quality in University: Focus on Online/Offline Lectures. Journal of the Korea Service Management Society. 14(3), 79-104.

50.

Yu, G. B., & Kim, J.-H. (2008). Testing the Mediating Effect of the Quality of College Life in the Student Satisfaction and Student Loyalty Relationship. Applied Research Quality Life, 3, 1-21.

51.

Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2004). Beyond Valence in Customer Dissatisfaction: A Review and New Findings on Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment in Failed Services. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 445-455.

The Journal of Distribution Science