Purpose - This study analyzes loading efficiency by loading pattern for package standardization and reduction of logistics costs, along with the creation of revenue for the revenue review panel (RRP) of Membership Wholesale Clubs (MWC). The study aims to identify standard dimensions that can help improve the compatibility of the pallets related to display patterns preferred by the MWC and thereby explore ways to enhance logistics efficiency between manufacturers and retailers through standardization. Research design, data, and methodology - The study investigates and analyzes the current status based on actual case examples, i.e., manufacturer A and Korea's MWC (A company, B company, and C company), and thus devises improvement measures. To achieve this, the case of manufacturer A delivering to MWC was examined, and the actual pallet display patterns for each MWC were investigated by visiting each distribution site. In this study, TOPS (Total Optimization Packaging Software, USA) was used as the tool for pallet loading efficiency simulations the maximum allowable dimension was set to 0.0mm to prevent the pallet from falling outside the parameters, and the loading efficiency was analyzed with the pallet area. In other words, the study focused on dimensions (length x width x height) according to the research purpose and thereby deduced results. Results - The analysis of pallet loading patterns showed that the most preferred loading patterns for loading efficiency according to product specification, such as pinwheel, brick, and block patterns, were used in the case of the general distribution products, but the products were configured with block patterns in most cases when delivered to MWCs. The loading efficiency by loading pattern was analyzed with respect to 104 nationally listed standard dimensions. Meanwhile, No.51 (330 × 220mm) of KS T 1002 (1,100 × 1,100mm) was found to be the dimension that could bring about an improved loading efficiency, over 90.0% simultaneously in both the T-11 and T-12 pallet systems in a loading pattern configuration with the block pattern only, and the loading efficiency simulation results also confirmed this as the standard dimension that can be commonly applied to both the T-11 pallet (90.0%) and the T-12 pallet (90.7%) systems. Conclusions - The loading efficiency simulation results by loading pattern were analyzed: For the T-11 pallet system, 17 standard dimension sizes displayed the loading efficiency of 90.0% or more as block patterns, and the loading capacity was an average of 99.0%. For the T-12 pallet system, 35 standard dimension sizes displayed the loading efficiency of more than 90% as block patterns (the average loading efficiency of 98.6%). Accordingly, this study proposes that the standard dimensions of 17 sizes with the average loading efficiency of 99.0% should be applied in the use of the T-11 pallet system, and those of 35 sizes with the average loading efficiency of 98.6% should be reviewed and applied in the use of the T-12 pallet system.
Banker, S. (2010). The Importance of packaging in supply chain management. Retrieved Jun. 21, 2010, from http://logisticsviewpoints.com.
Daniel, Hellstrom, & Mazen, Saghir (2007). Packaging and Logistics Interactions in Retail Supply Chains. Packaging Technology and Science, 20(3), 197-216.
ECR Europe (2007). Shelf Ready Packaging/Retail Ready Packaging, Dublin, Ireland: Accenture Publishing.
Han, Gwan-Soon, & Lee, Rae-Hyup (2012). A Case Study on Logistics Efficiency and System Improvement of Agricultural Products from Jeju Province - Focus on forwarding cleaned Radish and Cabbages from Jeju Province to Garak Wholesale Market. The Journal of Korea Logistics Review, 22(2), 175-201.
Hanlon, J. F. (1984). Handbook of packaging Engineering. NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Jung, Sung-Tae (2011). Packaging Issues of Discount Store. Smart Logistics Workshop, 1(1), 85-101.
Jung, Sung-Tae (2012). A Study on the Operation Method of Packaging System to Enhance Logistics Efficiency between Manufacturers and Distributors: Focusing on Retail Ready Packaging. Incheon, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Incheon National University.
Jung, Sung-Tae, & Kim, Tae-Bok (2012a). Study on the Effects of Implementation of RRP on Load Efficiency through Manufacturers’ Packaging System. Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 113-123.
Jung, Sung-Tae, & Kim, Tae-Bok (2012b). A study about impacts of RRP display shelf's dimension on pallet's loading efficiency. Journal of the Korea Logistics Review, 22(2), 51-81.
Jung, Sung-Tae (2013). A Study on Compatible Pallet Sizes between T-11 and T-12 Pallet System : Focused on KS T 1002. Journal of Korea Logistics Review, 23(2), 63-97.
Jung, Sung-Tae, & Yoon, Nam-Soo (2013). The Effect on Logistics Cost of Incompatible Packaging Sizes in T-11and T-12 pallet systems. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(8), 13-21.
Jung, Sung-Tae, Yoon, Nam-Soo, & Han, Kyu-Chul (2014). Study on the Effect of Product Line Pricing on Loading Efficiency and Logistics Cost. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(8), 55-69.
Kim, Chung (2009). Packaging of Corrugated Fiberboard Box, Seoul, Korea: Packaging Industry Publishing.
Kook, Woo-Kag (2013). An Empirical Study on the Efficiency and Productivity of Logistics Firms using DEA and Malmquist. Journal of Korea Logistics Review, 23(1), 29-49.
KOTRA Global Window (2012). Summary of COSTCO. Retrieved Oct. 17, 2012, from http://www.globalwindow.org/gw/overmar ket/GWOMAL020M.html?BBS_ID=10&MENU_CD=M10103&UPPER_MENU_CD=M10102&MENU_STEP=3&ARTICLE _ID=2157141
Lee, Gwang-Jong (2009). Global Store Operation, Seoul, Korea:Aid Book Publishing.
Lee, Myung-Hoon, & Jung, Jun-Jae (2009). Study on Development of Export Packaging for Fresh Melon. Journal of Korea Society of Packaging Science and Technology, 15(2), 83-91.
Shin, Hae-Woong (2011). Efficiency Evaluation Model of the Unit Load System Based on the Principle of Compatibility and Consistency. Journal of Korea Logistics Review, 21(5), 5-24.
Youn, Myoung-Kil, & Kim, Yu-Oh (2010). Principles of Distribution. Seoul, Korea: Doonam Publishing.
Yun, Gi-Seon, & Park, Jung-Sub (2013). A Study on the Logistics Standardization Impact on Corporate Efficiency. The Journal of Korea Logistics Review, 23(5), 167-188.
Twede, D. (1992). The process of logistical packaging innovation. Journal of Business Logistics, 13(1), 69-95.