바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Color on Perceived Price Attractiveness: Interaction of Regulatory Focus and Involvement

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.10, pp.117-126
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.10.201610.117
Park, Eun-Young
Lee, Eun-Young

Abstract

Purpose - Color is perceived to have an effect on humans' cognition and behavior because of its association with specific concepts. Since there are few studies linking color and price presentation, we investigated a constrained condition of consumers' regulatory focus and involvement. Research design, data, and methodology - We performed a 2 (color: red vs. black) × 2 (regulatory focus: prevention vs. promotion) × 2 (involvement: high vs. low) test of our hypothesis. The target product was a portable data storage device (USB) and data from 165 respondents were analyzed. Each condition had two stages. In the first, product information and price were presented. After reviewing the product information, respondents evaluated price attractiveness. In the second stage, respondents filled out regulatory focus and involvement questionnaires. The main variables were color, regulatory focus, and involvement. Therefore, we ran a three-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) to test our hypothesis. Results - When the price was red (vs. black), consumers perceived the red price as more attractive than the black price. However, this effect varied by situation. Specifically, in the low involvement condition among prevention-focused consumers, when the price was in red, price attractiveness was higher than when the price was in black. However, for promotion-focused consumers, there was no difference in the price color effect. In the high involvement condition, promotion-focused consumers showed stronger price attractiveness for the red price than the black price. However, the effect of price color diminished for prevention-focused consumers. That is, prevention-focused consumers did not reveal a different price perception between red versus black in the high involvement condition. Conclusions - This research contributes by academically linking the effects of color to price attractiveness, and focusing on the interaction of regulatory focus and involvement. When involvement is low, the effect of red disappeared for promotion-focused consumers, whereas the same happened for prevention-focused consumers under the condition of high involvement.

keywords
Effect of Color, Price Presentation, Regulatory Focus, Involvement, Price Attractiveness

Reference

1.

Bagchi, Rajesh, & Cheema, Amar (2013). The effect of red background color on willingness-to-pay: The moderating role of selling mechanism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 947-960.

2.

Bellizi, Joseph A., Crowley, Ayn E., & Hasty, Ronald W. (1983). The effects of color in store design. Journal of Retailing, 59(1), 21-45.

3.

Bellizi, Joseph A., Crowley, Ayn E., & Hite, Robert E. (1992). Environmental color, consumer feelings and purchase likelihood. Psychology and Marketing, 9(5), 347-363.

4.

Celsi, Richard L., & Olson, Jerry C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.

5.

Cesario, Joseph, Grant, Heidi, & Higgins, E. Tory (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from feeling right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3). 388-404.

6.

Chernev, Alexander (2004a). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 141-150.

7.

Chernev, Alexander (2004b). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 557-565.

8.

Coulter, Keith S., & Coulter, Robin A. (2005). Size does matter:The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64-76.

9.

Coulter, Keith S., & Norberg, Patricia A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 144-157.

10.

Crowe, Ellen, & Higgins, E. Tory (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 69(2), 117-172.

11.

Crowley, Ayn E. (1993). The two-dimensional impact of color on shopping. Marketing Letters, 4(1), 59-69.

12.

Darke, Peter R., & Chung, Cindy M. Y. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 35-47.

13.

Elliot, Andrew. J., Maier, Markus A., Moller, Arlen C., Friedman, Ron, & Meinhardt, Jörg (2007). Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 154-168.

14.

Elliot, Andrew. J., Binser, Martin J., Friedman, Ron, & Pekrun, Reinhard (2009). The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 365-375.

15.

Friedman, Ronald S., & Förster, Jen (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.

16.

Gorn, Gerald. J., Chattopadhyay, Amitava, Yi, Tracey, & Dahl, Darren W. (1997). Effects of color as an executional cue in advertising: They’re in the shade. Management Science, 43(10), 1387-1400.

17.

Gorn, Gerald. J., Chattopadhyay, Amitava, Sengupta, Jaideep, & Tripathi, Shashank (2004). Waiting for the web: How screen color affects time perception. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 215-225.

18.

Hanss, Daniel, Böhm, Gisela, & Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger (2012). Active red sports car and relaxed purple-blue van:Affective qualities predict color appropriateness for car types. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(5), 368-380.

19.

Hardesty, David M., & Bearden, William O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing. 79(1), 17-25.

20.

Haws, Kelly L., Dholakia, Utpal M., & Bearden, William O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 967-982.

21.

Higgins, E. Tory (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

22.

Higgins, E. Tory (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.

23.

Higgins, E. Tory Shah, James, & Friedman, Ronald (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515-525.

24.

Hwang, Insuk & Lee, Hyangjoo (2012). Effects of preference and fit of product color on purchase intention. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 27(1), 27-43.

25.

Jain, Shallendra P., Agrawal, Nidhi, & Maheswaran, Durairaj (2006). When more may be less: The effects of regulatory focus on responses to different comparative frames. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 91-98.

26.

Kim, Kyungmi, & Ryu, Gangseok (2008). Regulatory focus and tensile price claims. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 23(4), 197-217.

27.

Kim, Yeung-Jo (2014). The influence of AD model on product evaluation: The role of color. Journal of Korean Marketing Management, 19(1), 65-75.

28.

Kim, Young Doo, & Ha, Young-Won (2011). The Influence of regulatory focus and the configuration of retrun-risk information on consumer choice of financial investment products. Journal of Consumer Studies, 22(4), 103-132.

29.

Labrecque, Lauren I., & Milne, George R. (2012). Exciting red and competent blue: The importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 711-727.

30.

Lee, Angela Y., & Higgins, E. Tory (2009). The persuasive power of regulatory fit. in Frontiers of Social Psychology:Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior (ed.). Michaela Wänke, New York: Psychology Press.

31.

Lee, Angela Y., & Aaker, Jennifer L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2). 205-218.

32.

Lee, Byong-Kwan Steven, Oh, Sejo, & Kim, Sang-Duck (2014). The effects of goal incongruity between franchisor and franchisee on regulatory focus, performance, and opportunism of franchisee. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(2), 39-473

33.

Lee, Yoonjae, & Park, Kiwan (2012). The metacognitive influence of color on product attitude: The case for red and its conceptual relation to sexual attractiveness. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 27(1), 135-160.

34.

Liberman, Nira, Idson, Lorraine. C., Camacho, Christopher. J., & Higgins, E. Tony (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135-1145.

35.

Mehta, Ravi, & Zhu, Rui (Juliet) (2009). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performance. Science, 323(5918), 1226-1229.

36.

Middlestadt, Susan E. (1990). The effect of background and ambient color on product attributes and beliefs. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 244-249.

37.

Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1981). Issue involvement as moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1), 20-24.

38.

Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., & Schmann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness:the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 135-145.

39.

Puccinelli, Nancy M., Chandrashekaran, Rajesh, Grewal, Dhuruv, & Suri, Rajneesh (2013). Are men seduced by red? The effect of red versus black prices on price perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 89(2), 115-125.

40.

Richins, Marsha L., & Bloch, Peter H. (1986). After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 280-285.

41.

Shah, James, & Higgins, E. Tory (1997). Expectancy × value Effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 447-458.

42.

Soldat, Alexander, Sinclair, Robert, & Mark, Melvin M. (1997). Color as an environmental processing cue: external affective cues can directly affect processing strategy without affecting mood. Social Cognition, 15(1), 55-71.

43.

Summerville, Amy, & Roese, Neal J. (2008). Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 247-254.

44.

Walsh, Lynn M., Toma Ramses B., Tuveson, Richard V., & Sondhi, Lydia (1990). Color preference and food choice among children. Journal of Psychology, 124(6), 645-653.

45.

Wang, Jing, & Lee, Angela Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing research, 43(1), 28-38.

46.

Wexner, Lois B. (1954). The degree to which colors(hues) are associated with mood-tones. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(6), 432-435.

47.

Wilson, Glenn D. (1966). Arousal properties of red versus green. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23(3), 947-949.

48.

Yoo, Changjo, & Hyun, Soeun (2011). Comparative Analyses on the Effects of Tensile Price Discounts by discount size and regulatory focus. Journal of Consumer Studies, 22(2), 253-275.

49.

Yun, TaiWoong, & Lee, Byung-Kwan (2011). Moderating roles of framing types and regulatory focus on the relationships between message framing and advertising responses. Korea Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology. 12(1), 169-189.

50.

Zaichkowsky, Judith L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 341-352.

The Journal of Distribution Science