바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Market Oriented Revenue Assistance for Farmers: A Case Study of the United State’s ACRE Program

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.11, pp.29-36
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.11.201611.29
Zulauf, Carl
Rhew, Chan-Hee
Kim, Sang-Hyo

Abstract

Purpose - Intense debate is occurring over support for farmers in Korea, specifically on the justification, policy design, and equality issues of the farm support programs. Given this debate, a new type of farm program in the US, a market flexible revenue program(the Average Crop Revenue Election, ACRE), is examined. ACRE stands in contrast to traditional programs that tie payments to price and have parameters that are fixed or change only infrequently. Research design, data, and methodology - Based on the ACRE program formulas, the potential payments are estimated by crop year, program crop and geographical area using the FSA acreage and payment rate data. Results - If all US farm program acres were in ACRE over the 2009-2013 crop years, payments would have totaled $7.95 billion or 1.2 percent of average market receipts for US crops. Enacting ACRE as a revenue program instead of a similarly-structured price-only program increased payments by $1.75 billion or 28 percent. Conclusions - Potential payments by ACRE largely reflected the distribution of the value of production across the program crops eligible for ACRE as well as across state geographical areas. If program parameters can be made acceptable and if data availability issues can be addressed, market flexible revenue programs offer a farm policy option that can address many of the concerns that have arisen over farm policy in Korea.

keywords
ACRE, Crop Revenue Program, Payments

Reference

1.

Congressional Research Service. (2014). The 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79): Summary and Side-by-Side Comparison. Report R43076. February 12. Coordinated by Chite, R. M.

2.

Edwards, W. M. (2011). Why Was ACRE a No-Go with Iowa Farmers? Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, 26(4), Retrieved May 22, 2015, from http://purl.umn.edu/120005

3.

Orden, D., Paarlberg, R., & Roe, T. (1999). Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4.

Robinson, K. L. (1989). Farm and Food Policies and Their Consequences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

5.

Tweeten, L. (1993). Farm Policy Analysis. Westview Press: Boulder, Colorado.

6.

US Congress (2014). Agricultural Act of 2014. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.

7.

USDA. Economic Research Service (1984). History of Agricultural Price-Support and Adjustment Programs, 1933-84. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 485 (report prepared by Bowers, D. E., Rasmussen, W. D., & Baker, G. L.). Washington, DC.: USDA.

8.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Economic Research Service (ERS). (2008). The 2008 Farm Bill Side- By-Side Comparison. Retrieved September 1, 2016, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/FarmBill/2008/

9.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Farm Service Agency (FSA). (2014). Direct and Counter-Cyclical Automation for State and County Offices. 2-DCP Revision. December 29.

10.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Farm Service Agency (FSA). (2015). Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program /ACRE. Retrieved September, 1, 2016, from http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/dccp-acre/index

11.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Farm Service Agency (FSA). ARC/PLC Program. Retrieved September, 1, 2016, from http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/arcplc_program/index.

12.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). (2016). Quick Stats 2.0. Retrieved September, 1, 2016, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/

13.

Woolverton, A., & Young, E. (2009). Factors Influencing ACRE Program Enrollment. USDA. ERS Economic Research Report Number 84. December

14.

Zulauf, C., Schnitkey, G., & Langemeier, M. (2010). Average Crop Revenue Election, Crop Insurance, and Supplemental Revenue Assistance: Interactions and Overlap for Illinois and Kansas Farm Program Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 42(3) 501-515.

15.

Zulauf, C., Schnitkey, G., & Langemeier, M. (2011). Analysis of ACRE’s Farm Eligibility Condition. The Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics.

The Journal of Distribution Science