바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Structural Relationship between Salesperson's Perceived Evaluation Fairness and Job Performance in the Financial Market

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.12, pp.141-151
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.12.201612.141
Lee, Jun-Seop
Kim, Ji-Young
Lee, Han-Geun

Abstract

Purpose - Salesperson perceptions of the fairness and accuracy of a performance evaluation system were examined by managerial and professional employees of large organization. The performance evaluation process is central to many personal decisions such as attitude for job and sales performance. This study investigates the relationship between perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. The main purpose of this study is to develop and empirically test a comprehensive model of salespersons' perceived evaluation fairness on sales performance. For this purpose, we identified the structural relationship between perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. Also we investigate the mediating effects on job satisfaction and organizational commitment between perceived evaluation fairness and sales performance. Research design, data, and methodology - To empirically test these relationships, data were collected by in-depth interviews from sales managers and questionnaire surveys from 300 salespersons who work for sales area (credit card company, insurance company). Demographically, the overall sample was 91.6% female, 77.9% 30s and 40s, and 34% college educated, with an average tenure with their present organizations of 4 years. The questionnaire was composed of total 20 items dealing with frequency, quality, and consequences of perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. To test the research hypotheses, collected data analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structure equation model (SEM). Results - Through extensive and rigorous literature review process of related literature(Perceived evaluation fairness, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Sales performance), research model and research hypothesis was set up. This study obtains the following research results. First, perceived evaluation fairness has a positive effect on job satisfaction, whereas the effects of perceived evaluation fairness on organizational commitment and sales performance did not show statistically significant result. Second, job satisfaction and organizational commitment have complete mediating roles to the relationship between perceived evaluation fairness and organizational commitment, and relationship between perceived evaluation fairness and sales performance. Conclusions - Based on the results, salespersons' perceived evaluation fairness is one of the key independent variable for making high job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. Finally the theoretical, managerial implication and research limitations are mentioned in the discussion.

keywords
Perceived Evaluation Fairness, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Sales Performance

Reference

1.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.

2.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Y. Yi (1988), On the Evaluation of Structural Models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

3.

Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents Organizational Commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95-112.

4.

Benkhoff, B. (1997). Ignoring Commitment Is Costly: New Approaches Establish the Missing Link between Commitment and Performance. Human Relations, 50(6), 701-726.

5.

Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact Employees: Relationships among Workplace Fairness, Job Satisfaction and Prosocial Service Behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39-61.

6.

Brashear, T. G., Brooks, C. M., & Boles, J. S. (2004). Distributive and procedural justice in a sales force context Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 57(1), 86-93.

7.

Choi, A-Ryoung, Kim, Cheong-Il, & Kim, Jung-Sook (2015). Study as to Effects of Organizational Justice for Employees in Food Service Corporation on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 29(7), 253-264.

8.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organization: A meta-analysis. Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.

9.

Cravens, D. W., Ingram, T. N., LaForge, R. W., & Young, C. E. (1993). Behavior-based and outcome-based salesforce control systems. The Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 47-59.

10.

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 137-150.

11.

Field, D., Pang, M., & Chiu, C. (2000). Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Employee Outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 547-562.

12.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management. 16(3), 399-432.

13.

Hegtvedt, K. A. (1993). Approaching distributive and procedural justice: Are separate routes necessary?. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O'Brien (eds.). Advances in group processes (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.

14.

Hong, Se-Hee (2000). The Criteria for Selecting Appropriate Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Their Rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.

15.

Hur, Chan-Young, & Park, Jung-Do (2012). Leader-Member Exchange on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Effectiveness. Korean Academy of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 177-203.

16.

Jung, Hee-Young (2015). Research on the influences of interactive justice and emotional intelligence of flight attendant on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Korean Association Of Human Resource Development, 18(2), 143-165.

17.

Lau, C. M., & Oger, B. (2012). Behavioral effects of fairness in performance measurement and evaluation systems: Empirical evidence from France. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28, 323-332.

18.

Lee, Hee-Tae (2015). A study on the effects of organizational justice in Local governments performance-oriented human resource management on civil servants job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job performance: focused on Busan. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 19(3), 53-75.

19.

Lee, Jong-Wan, Kim, Choong-Hyun, & Lee, Jae-Hoon (2014). A Study on the Effect of the Perception of Justice on Pay for Performance System of Finance and Investment Companies to the Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Customer Orientation. Korean business education review, 29(4), 56-88.

20.

LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature of dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.

21.

Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating Justice and Social Exchange:The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.

22.

Missing Link between Commitment and Performance. Human Relations, 50(6), 701-726.

23.

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.

24.

Nam, Sung-Ha (2013). The effect of perceived justice on organizational commitment and satisfaction to the local public enterprise. GRI Review, 15(3), 309-335.

25.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.

26.

Park, Jin-Young, Lee, Sung-Kwak, & Lee, Hee-Su (2011). Influence of Employee Evaluation Fairness on Trust and Organizational Commitment at First Class Hotels. Tourism Management, 26(2), 145-161.

27.

Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of management review, 9(4), 712-721.

28.

Piercy, N. F., Cravens, D. W., Lane, N., & Vorhies, D. W. (2006). Driving organizational citizenship behaviors and salesperson in-role behavior performance: The role of management control and perceived organizational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 244-262.

29.

Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.

30.

Steers, R. M. (1984). Introduction to Organizational Behavior (2nd ed.). GlenviewⅢ, Scott: Forresman &Co.

31.

Tan, S. L. C., & Lau, C. M. (2012). The Impact of Performance Measures on Employee Fairness Perceptions, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. JMAR, 10(2), 57-72.

32.

Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.

33.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (1992). Examining the causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Management, 18(1), 153-167.

34.

Williams, L. G., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Reanalysis Using Latent Variable Structural Equation Methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219-231.

The Journal of Distribution Science