바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Relationship among Brand Value Propositions, Brand Attitude and Brand Attachment considering Consumer Involvement

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.2, pp.103-111
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.2.201602.103
Kim, Gyu-Bae
Kim, Byoung-Goo

Abstract

Purpose - Many variables are needed for brand loyalty such as brand attitude, brand attachment, brand love and brand commitment. Thus, we should manage these all variables successfully for strong and differentiated brand equity. This study aims to identify the process of how the brand value propositions affect the brand attitude and brand attachment. This study specially conceptualizes that not only utilitarian value and hedonic value influence the brand attitude but also hedonic value influences the brand attachment. This study focuses on the moderating role of consumer involvement such as cognitive involvement and affective involvement in the causal relationships among brand value propositions, brand attitude, and brand attachment. Research design, data, and methodology - The five hypotheses were proposed and tested in this study. Three hypotheses were about the relationship among the brand value propositions(utilitarian value and hedonic value), brand attitude, and brand attachment. The other two hypotheses were about the moderating effect on consumer involvement in the causal relationships among brand value propositions, brand attitude, and brand attachment. Research data were collected from the students of universities located in Daejeon-Si and Chungchungnam-Do. For the purpose of test the hypotheses empirically, the 208 responses were used. We utilized SPSS18.0 for statistical analysis such as reliability test, factor analysis, and regression analysis. Results - The results show that the utilitarian value and hedonic value have influence on the brand attitude positively. The results also show that the hedonic value has influence on the brand attachment positively. We found that there is a moderating effect on the cognitive involvement in the relationship between the utilitarian value and the brand attitude. However, there is no moderating effect on the affective involvement in the relationship between the hedonic value and brand attachment. In Summary, 4 of 5 hypotheses in this study were supported and 1 hypothesis was not supported. We should identify the reason why the hypothesis 5, the moderating effect of the affective involvement in the relationship between the hedonic value and brand attachment, was rejected in this empirical analysis. Conclusions - Both the utilitarian value and the hedonic value that propose a brand are important for brand attitude. Specially, the hedonic value is important for brand attachment. Companies should provide the consumers with both the utilitarian value and the hedonic value in a balanced way for their favorable brand attitude and strong brand attachment. In the retail industry, the balance between the utilitarian value and the hedonic value is important in that there are many product brands and store brands providing consumers with various benefit and values. Also, there are possibilities that the causal relationships among brand value propositions, brand attitude and brand attachment are moderated by consumer involvement such as cognitive involvement and affective involvement. Companies should understand and consider consumer involvement for their efficient and effective brand management decision making.

keywords
Brand Value Propositions, Brand Attitude, Brand Attachment, Consumer Involvement

Reference

1.

Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extension. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.

2.

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press.

3.

Aaker, David A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3), 90-103.

4.

Ahn, Kwang-Ho, & Im, Mi-Wha (2008). The moderating effect of product type and self-monitoring: The effect of product benefit on brand attachment and brand commitment. Journal of Consumer Studies, 19(1), 169-189.

5.

Ahn, Kwang-Ho, Jeon, Joo-Eon, & Lee, Ji-Eun (2009). The effects of luxury brand -self identification on brand attachment and brand commitment: the moderating role of regulatory focus. Asia Marketing Journal, 10(4), 1-33.

6.

Ahn, Kwang-Ho, Lee, Ji-Eun, & Jeon, Joo-Eon (2009). The path model of brand attitude and brand attachment. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 20(5), 67-89.

7.

Ahn, Kwang-Ho, Han, Sang-Man, & Jeon, Sung-Ryul (2013). Strategic Brand Management (4th ed.). Seoul, Korea:Hakhyunsa.

8.

Arjun, Chaudhuni, & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance:the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81-93.

9.

Arnould, E., Linda P., & George Z. (2004), Consumers, second edition. McGrow-Hill International Edition.

10.

Baldinger, A. A., & J. Rubinsion, J. (1996). Brand loyalty: the link between attitude and behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(6), 22-34.

11.

Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and Accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 94-109.

12.

Baloglu, Seyhmus (2002). Dimension of customer loyalty. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 47-59.

13.

Bloch, Peter H., & Richins, Marsha L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 47, 69-81.

14.

Chaudhuri A., & Arjun, C. (1999). Does brand loyalty mediate brand equity outcomes? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(2), 36-146.

15.

Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2007). Form versus Function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 702-714.

16.

Day, G. S. (1969). Two dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 2(3), 29-36.

17.

Fournier, Susan (1998). Consumer and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 343-372.

18.

Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72.

19.

Haugtvedt, C. P., & R. E. Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 308-319.

20.

Henry A. (1998). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

21.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). Hedonic consumption:emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 90-101.

22.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.

23.

Holmes, J. G. (2000). Social relationships: the nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 447-495.

24.

Howard, A. D. (1994). A detachment-limited model of drain age basin evolution. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 2261-2285.

25.

Huh, Won-Moo, Lee, Wan-Soo, Hwang, Yong-Hee, & Hwang, Mi-Jin (2006). Benefit and commitment management strategies to improve customer loyalty in telecommunication service market. Advertising Research, 70, 229-255.

26.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.

27.

Keller, K. L. (2003). Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. NewJersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.

28.

Keller, K. L., Heckler, S. E., & Houston, M. J. (1998). The effects of brand name suggestiveness on advertising recall. Journal of Marketing, 621(1), 48-57.

29.

Kim, Hae-Ryong, Lee, Moon-Kyu, & Kim, Na-Min (2005). Determinants and Consequences of the Brand Attachment. Journal of Consumer Studies, 16(3), 45-65.

30.

Lai, A. W. (1995). Consumer values, product benefits and customer value: a behavior approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 381-388.

31.

Lee, Doo-Hee (2002). Advertising Management. Seoul, Korea, Pakyoungsa.

32.

Lee, Hak-Shik, Ahn, Kwang-Ho, & Ha, Young-Won (2015). Consumer Behavior (6th ed.). Seoul, Korea: JHJBook.

33.

Lee, Hak-Sik, Jun, Sun-Kyu, & Choi, Young-Jin (2007). The effects of cognitive and emotional responses on consumer satisfaction judgment: distinguishing perceived performance into functional and psychological benefits. Korea Marketing Review, 22(2), 1-19.

34.

Low, G. S., & Lamb, C. J. (2000). The measurement and dimension ability of brand associations. Journal of product and Brand Management, 9(6), 350-370.

35.

Mano, H., & Oliver, R. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 451-466.

36.

Miller, R. S. (1997). Attentive and contented: relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 758-766.

37.

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332.

38.

Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430.

39.

Block, P. H., Sherrell, D. L., & Ridgway, N. M. (1985). Consumer search: an extended framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 119-126.

40.

Park, C. W., & Macinnis, D. J. (2006). What’s in and what’s out: questions on the boundaries of the attitude construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 16-18.

41.

Park, C. Whan, & Young, S. Mark (1986). Consumer response to television commercials: the impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 11-214.

42.

Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior: marketing strategy perspectives. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

43.

Song, Sang-Yeon, Kim, Byoung-Jai, & Kim, Gyu-Bae (2010). A study on consumer evaluations of brand alliances with global brands: focused on the alliance between high-tech brand and high-fashion brand. International Business Review, 14(2), 27-49

44.

Thomson. M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. Whan (2005). The ties that bine: measuring the strength of consumers'emotional attachment to brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 51-56.

45.

Voss, K., Eric, R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 10-20.

46.

Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (1996). Services marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

The Journal of Distribution Science