바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.14 No.8

Citation Share

How the Lender-Borrower Relationship Influences M&As: an Analysis of a Strategic Action in Japan

How the Lender–Borrower Relationship Influences M&As: an Analysis of a Strategic Action in Japan

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.8, pp.93-100
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.8.201608.93
Koo, Ja-Seung (Faculty of Economics, Kobe International University)
Koo, Ja-Seung. (2016). How the Lender-Borrower Relationship Influences M&As: an Analysis of a Strategic Action in Japan. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 14(8), 93-100, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.8.201608.93

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines lenders' reactions to M&A, based on the strength of the lender-borrower relationship and the lender's expectations of the potential benefits or risks of the deal. Research design, data, and methodology - This research addresses the lender's influence on the implementation stage of a large-scale strategic action such as M&A to understand the motivation and dynamics of lenders' responses and empirically examines how the lender-borrower relationship influences the focal firm's merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions, using data on 501 M&A deals in Japan from 1990 to 2010. Results - The presented analysis found that lenders that have a strong lender-borrower relationship, especially those showing a high debt equity ratio, support borrowers' M&A progress and the target firm's lenders resist the deal progressing and may raise the acquisition premium if their current power relative to borrowers is weak. Conclusions - Stakeholders including lenders do not favor strategies of focal firms that threaten their future benefits, while they also tend to estimate the potential benefits and losses by comparing their current circumstances with those of other stakeholders. The empirical results of the presented analysis help explain the mechanism of lenders' reactions and offer insights into the power of a closer and stronger lender-borrower relationship.

keywords
Lender-Borrower Relationship, Acquisitions, Acquisition Premium, Stakeholder Theory

참고문헌

1.

Bharath, S., Dahiya, S., Saunders, A., & Srinivasan, A. (2007). So what do I get? The bank’s view of lending relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 368-419.

2.

Bergh, D. D. (1997). Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: An integrative model of ex ante conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 751-731.

3.

Boot, A.W.A. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we know?. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 7-25.

4.

Chimucheka, T. (2013). Obstacles to Accessing Finance by Small Business Operators in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(2), 23-29.

5.

Dahiya, S., Saunders, A., & Srinivasan, A. (2003b). Financial distress and bank lending relationships. Journal of Finance, 58, 375-399.

6.

Dass, N., & Massa, M. (2009). The impact of a strong bank-firm relationship on the borrowing firm. The Society for Financial Studies, 74, 1204-1260.

7.

Drucker, S., & Puri, M. (2005). On the benefits of concurrent lending and underwriting. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2763-2799.

8.

Fraser, D. R., Kolari, J. W., Pynnonen, S., & Tippens, T. K. (2011). Market power, bank megamergers, and the welfare of bank borrowers. The Journal of Financial Research, 34(4), 641-658.

9.

Fuller, K., Netter, J., & Stegemoller, M. (2002). What do returns to acquiring firms tells us? Evidence from firms that make many questions. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1763-1793.

10.

Laamanen, T. (2007). On the role of acquisition premium in acquisition research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1359-1369.

11.

Lummer, S., & McConnell, J. (1989). Further evidence on the bank lending process and the reaction of the capital markets to bank loan agreements. Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 99-122.

12.

Mago, S., Musasa, G., & Matunhu, J. (2013). The impact of globalization on business and economic development in Zimbabwe. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(2), 31-37.

13.

Muehlfeld, K., Sahib, P. R., & Witteloostuijn, A. J. (2012). A contextual theory of organizational learning from failures and successes: A study of acquisition completion in the global newspaper industry, 1981-2008. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 938-964.

14.

Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49, 3-37.

15.

Preston, L. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 361-375.

16.

Puranam, P., Powell, B. C., & Singh, H. (2006). Due diligence as a signal detection problem. Strategic Organization, 4(4), 319-348.

17.

Rajan, R. G. (1992). Insider and outsiders: The choices between relationship and arm’s length debt. Journal of Finance, 47, 1367-1400.

18.

Rajan, R. G., & Winton, A. (1995). Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor. Journal of Finance, 50, 1113-1146.

19.

Ramakrishnan, R. T. S., & Thakor, A. V. (1984). Information Reliability and a Theory of Financial Intermediation. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 415-432.

20.

Schweiger, D. M. (2002). M&A integration: A framework for executives and managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Viatkina, T. (2014). Strategic Resource Initiative of Enterprise. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 5-11.

22.

Yasuda, A. (2005). Do bank relationships affect the firm’s underwriter choice in the corporate-bond underwriting market?. Journal of Finance, 60, 1259-1292.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책