바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on e-learning Contents Opening Information for Distribution Industry Labor Competence

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.8, pp.65-73
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.8.201708.65
Kim, Yong
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Although e-learning has this advantage, currently many organizations have failed to recognize the necessity for basic e-learning educational training. It follows that practitioners working in the above organizations face the difficulty of having to find educational training processes of boosting their capabilities by themselves, rather than being able to utilize the educational training processes offered by e-learning. So of their own accord, learners have considered the necessity of information relating to being able to choose between high quality educational training processes. The purpose of this study is to propose opening e-learning content information for enabling an efficient choice of learning processes related to e-learning. Research design, data, and methodology - To pinpoint the items of e-learning content information, the study was initiated according to the following process. First, information relating to e-learning content (offered on e-learning websites) was researched. Second, based on the items of information which emerged from the research, selection and validity verification took place with 5 e-learning specialists as the subjects. Third, the opinions of adult learners at K University were collated relating to the items of information which emerged from the research. Results - The e-learning content information was comprised of 16 items in order to improve the choosing process for learner's e-learning contents. The analysis results showed that when learners were choosing e-learning processes, the most highly considered item was 'mobile support' (4.35). Following this (in order) were 'tuition fees' (4.30), 'certificate issuing' (4.23), and 'awareness of educational institution' (4.18). The least considered items were 'recruiting learners' (3.01) and 'tutor support' (3.18). Conclusions - The 16 items of e-learning content information in this study, were deemed to be helpful to learners in providing them with a choice of desirable e-learning process when this process was offered to them. Following this, there is a need for service institutions offering e-learning processes to make public the information suggested by this study. Research into educational methods additionally points to a necessity for not only e-learning forms, but also offline educational methods and a combination of blended learning to be offered and run parallel to e-learning.

keywords
e-Learning, Contents, Competence, Opening Items, Labor

Reference

1.

An, S. B., Song, I. A., & Hwang, H. J. (2013). The Influence of the Car Master’s Recognized Core Capability level in Achieving Customer Satisfaction:Emphasis on Mediating Effect of Moment of Truth Quality. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 37-49.

2.

Berge Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing:Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 15(1), 22-30.

3.

Ha, Y. J. (2011). The Effects of Mobile Learning for Just in Time Learning on Learning Satisfaction and Learning Competence. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 7(1), 17-41.

4.

Hong, H. S., Seock, Y. K., & Kim, S. Y. (2015). The Impacts of Consumer Perceptions of Product Reviews Posted on Online Stores on Perceptions of Online Shopping and Online Purchase Intention. The Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(4), 1-30.

5.

Hong, K. C. (2016). Effects of Flipped Learning on Self-Directed Learning Ability and Learning Motivation of College Students. The Journal of Thinking Development, 12(4), 41-61.

6.

Hur, S. J. (2012). The effects of characteristics of individual and institute on choice intentions to lifelong educational institute. Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 79-109.

7.

Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2017). Facilitating and Bridging Out-of-Class and In-Class Learning: An Interactive E-Book-Based Flipped Learning Approach for Math Courses. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 184-197.

8.

International Organization for Standardization(2008). Text of ISO/IEC FCD 2382-36, Information Technology – Vocabulary –Part 36 – Learning, Education and Training. ISO/IEC 2382-36: 2008.

9.

Kim, J. M. (2016). A Study on e-Learning Contents Development NCS Utilization through Analysis of Overseas NCS. Journal of the Society of e-Learning, 1(1), 29-36.

10.

Kim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2016). What Are Learning Satisfaction Factors in Flipped Learning?. Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 421, 750-755.

11.

Ko, T. H., & Kim, Y. T. (2012). A Study on Adoption and Performance Analysis in Korea SMEs through Integrate IT Acceptance Model. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(5), 2509-2529.

12.

Korean Standards Service Network (2010). Information technology-Vocabulary-Part 36:Learning, education and training. KS X ISO/IEC 2382-36. Seoul, Korea: KATS.

13.

Korean Standards Service Network (2012). e-Learning Quality Assurance Guideline - Content - Part3:Industrial Education. KS X 7002-3. Seoul, Korea:KATS.

14.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile usability and user experience. Mobile Learning: A handbook for educators and trainers, 45-56.

15.

Leam, J. H., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Effects of Flipped Learning on Learning Achievement, collaboration ability, and ICT literacy in Smart Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 809-836.

16.

Lee, E. K. (2014). An analysis of the mobile learning usages of adult learners and the effects of their perceptions of mobile learning to their learning achievements in a cyber-university. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 17(13), 65-74.

17.

Lee, J. M., Jung, Y. J., Park, H. K., & Cho, B. R. (2016). Effects of Academic Emotion Regulation and Group Cohesiveness on Learning Satisfaction and Learning Interest in the University Flipped Learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 341-356.

18.

Lee, Y. M. (2005). Identifying Influential Variables that Affect Adult Learner's Selection Process of E-Learning Programs. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 59-76.

19.

Min. Education & Korea Education & Research Information Service. 2016 White Paper on ICT in Education Korea. Dague, Korea: KERIS.

20.

Min. of Trade, Industry & Energy, National IT Industry Promotion Agency (2017). 2016 Survey of Korean e-Learning Industry. Chungbuk, Korea: NIPA.

21.

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.

22.

Noh, K. S., & Park, S. H. (2013). Improvement Alternatives of the Legal System on the Vocational Education and Training for e-Learning Industry Promotion. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(11), 163-168.

23.

Oh, S. H., & Choi, S. D. (2008). Searching for the Rational Ways of Education Information Disclosure System on the Elementary and Secondary Schools. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 12(2), 229-247.

24.

Park, Y. S., & Jerome, G. (2017). State of the Future 2030-2050. Seoul, Korea: Kyobo books.

25.

Roh, H. L., Choi, M. N., & Park, S. H. (2017). A Study on the Difference of Satisfaction and Achievement According to Development Type, Delivery Type and Operation Type in online contents of flipped learning in university. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(6), 419-440.

26.

Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of computer assisted learning, 19(3), 260-272.

27.

Seo, C. G. (2013). Study on the Instructors’ Factors Affecting Student Performance Under e-Learning Environment. The Journal of Digital Policy &Management, 11(8), 341-347.

28.

Sim, H. (2017). The Effect of Mentor Feedback on Self-Regulated Learning, Self-Directed Learning, and Academic Achievement in an Online Learning Environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 25(1), 169-189.

29.

Son, E. J. (2017). The effect of flipped learning instruction on the preservice childcare teachers’learning motivation and occupational key competencies. The Korean Society for Early Childhood Education & Care, 12(1), 93-116.

30.

The Academy of Korean Studies (2017). Encylopopedia of Korean Culture. Retrieved from http://encykorea.aks.ac.kr.

31.

Woo, Y. H. (2016). Development of online contents using vicarious interaction in large web-based courses and analysis of learners response. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(4), 609-628.

The Journal of Distribution Science