바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Role of Structural Holes in Uncertain Environments in Channel Relationships

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.6, pp.25-35
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.6.201806.25
Kim, Min-Jung

Abstract

Purpose - Although marketing networks are crucial competitive advantage in terms of firm's new information and resource acquisition ability, their impact on new product development performance remains vague, especially under environmental uncertainty. The principal objective of this research is to provide a better understanding of effects of technological uncertainty and volume uncertainty on first tier supplier's perceived performance of new product development under conditions reflecting varying levels of structural holes. Specifically, this research examines the moderating effect of structural holes on the relationship between environmental uncertainty and new product development performance. Research design, data, and methodology - To test the hypotheses, a questionnaire survey was conducted with a Korean engineering firm's major first-tier suppliers in the context of internal network entities, manufacturer-supplier-subsupplier relationships, and to verify the proposed hypotheses, structural equation modeling was established. Construct measures were based on existing measures and previous research. Results - The survey results indicate that technological uncertainty and volume uncertainty differentially affect NPD performance under conditions of high and low structural holes. Conclusions - This study offer some theoretical and practical implications among distribution channel members, especially, this study suggests that interfirm networks have critical competitive advantage in uncertain environments. The distinctiveness of engineering industry might limit the generalizability of the results. Thus, future research should consider a wider range of industries.

keywords
Technological Uncertainty, Volume Uncertainty, New Product Development (NPD), Interfirm Network, Channel Relationships

Reference

1.

Achrol, R. S., Reve, T., & Stern, L. W. (1983). The environment of marketing channel dyads: A framework for comparative analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 55-67.

2.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

3.

Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations Evolving. New York:Sage.

4.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.

5.

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.

6.

Auster, E. R. (1992). The relationship of industry evolution to patterns of technological linkages, joint ventures, and direct investment between US and Japan. Management Science, 38(6), 778-792.

7.

Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S., & Lee, D. J. (2000). Managing marketing channel opportunism: the efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 51-65.

8.

Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, MA: Harvard University Press.

9.

Burt, R. S. (2000). The contingent value of social capital. In Knowledge and Social Capital (pp.255-286).

10.

Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423.

11.

Burt, R. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2003). Using resourcebased theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 127-141.

13.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24(1), 29-39.

14.

Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150.

15.

Chung, J. E., & Jin, B. (2011). In-group preference as opportunism governance in a collectivist culture:evidence from Korean retail buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(4), 237-249.

16.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy (pp.39-67).

17.

Coleman, J. S. (2000). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95- 121.

18.

Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001). Information seeking in social context: Structural influences and receipt of information benefits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C(applications and reviews), 31(4), 438-448.

19.

Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211-229.

20.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

21.

Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.

22.

Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.

23.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

24.

Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652.

25.

Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.

26.

Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.

27.

Gupta, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2003). Managing demand uncertainty in supply chain planning. Computers &Chemical Engineering, 27(8-9), 1219-1227.

28.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.

29.

Hoetker, G. (2005). How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 75-96.

30.

Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship:assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253-273.

31.

Hsuan, J. (1999). Impacts of supplier–buyer relationships on modularization in new product development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 5(3-4), 197-209.

32.

Hutt, M., & T. Speh (2000). Business marketing management: A strategic view of industrial and organizational markets, Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publisher.

33.

Hwang, S., & Suh, E. (2017). An Empirical Study on the Vendor’s Opportunism in the Collaboration between Buyer and Vendor. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(5), 53-63.

34.

Ishaq, M. I., Hussain, N., Khaliq, W., & Waqas, M. (2012). A review on triple-A supply chain performance. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 35-39.

35.

Jaccard, J., Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

36.

Klein, S., Frazier, G. L., & Roth, V. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 196-208.

37.

Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 795-816.

38.

Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks:external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1-26.

39.

Mansfield, E. (1988). Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A comparative study. The American Economic Review, 78(2), 223-228.

40.

Mendenhall, W., Sincich, T., & Boudreau, N. S. (1996). A second course in statistics: regression analysis (Vol.5). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

41.

Mishra, A. A., & Shah, R. (2009). In union lies strength:Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 324-338.

42.

Mullins, J. W., & Sutherland, D. J. (1998). New product development in rapidly changing markets: an exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 224-236.

43.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.

44.

Oh, J., & Rhee, S. K. (2008). The influence of supplier capabilities and technology uncertainty on manufacturer-supplier collaboration: A study of the Korean automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(6), 490-517.

45.

Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2003). A model of supplier integration into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(4), 284-299.

46.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

47.

Powell, W. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life. In N.J. Smesler And R. Swedberg (eds.) The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

48.

Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

49.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY:Simon & Schuster.

50.

Saxenian, A. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33(1), 89-112.

51.

Siddiqui, M. A., & Erum, N. (2016). Modeling Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Growth of Trade Volume in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(2), 33-39.

52.

Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.

53.

Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). The determinants of Japanese new product successes. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 64-76.

54.

Stump, R. L., & Heide, J. B. (1996). Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 431-441.

55.

Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224.

56.

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.

57.

Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109-125.

58.

Walker, G., & Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 373-391.

59.

Wasserman, S. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Sage.

60.

Wasti, S. N., & Liker, J. K. (1999). Collaborating with suppliers in product development: A US and Japan comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(4), 444-460.

61.

Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36-51.

62.

Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1-31.

63.

Young, R. (2001). Uncertainty and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publication.

64.

Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809-825.

65.

Zhatkanbaev, E. B., Mukhtar, E. S., & Suyunchaliyeva, M. M. (2015). Innovative Mechanisms in the Procurement Logistics of Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(3), 33-36.

66.

Zhou, K. Z., & Xu, D. (2012). How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7), 677-692.

The Journal of Distribution Science