- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
소비자 혁신성향이 친환경제품 만족도에 미치는 영향 : 혁신성향, 친환경성향 및 친환경 제품 혁신성의 상호작용효과
Effects of Consumer Innovativeness on Environment-friendly Product Satisfaction
송미령 (Business Administration Seoul National University)
주우진 (Marketing, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
Abstract
Purpose - Environment-friendly behaviors are diverse and can be motivated by different factors. For example, magnitude of factors affecting recycling behavior could be different from those affecting purchasing of environmentally-friendly products. In this study, the focus is on usage satisfaction of consumers who have purchased environmentally-friendly products. Research design, data, and methodology - For this purpose, data were collected from a total of 345 users of environmentally-friendly products, consisting of 177 users of electric vehicles and 168 users of environmentally-friendly detergents. The study analyzed the relationships among consumer's innovation propensity, consumer's environmental concern, and usage satisfaction. In addition, the moderating effect of the product's innovativeness was examined. Results - The result shows that there is a relationship between consumer's innovation propensity and consumer's environmental concern. In particular, it is shown that both consumer's innovation propensity and consumer's environmental concern have positive effects on usage satisfaction. Further, there was a moderating effect of the product's innovativeness. Namely, products rated higher in innovativeness showed a greater effect of consumer's innovation propensity on usage satisfaction. The degree of the product's innovativeness also affected the directional paths of the relationships. In the electric vehicle (i.e., high product innovativeness) case, consumer's innovation propensity had a direct effect on usage satisfaction, as well as an indirect effect through consumer's environmental concern. In the environmentally-friendly detergent (i.e., low product innovativeness) case, consumer's innovation propensity only had an indirect effect on usage satisfaction, through consumer's environmental concern. Conclusions - Theoretical contributions of this study are as follows. Foremost, this is the first study that suggests an existence of a relationship between consumer's innovation propensity and consumer's environmental concern. Second, this study showed the positive effect of consumer's innovation propensity on usage satisfaction of environmentally-friendly products. Third, this study expanded the scope of previous studies by showing the interaction between consumer's innovation propensity and consumer's environmental concern. Lastly, this study showed that the effect of these variables on usage satisfaction can differ by the degree of innovativeness of the environmentally-friendly product. The results of the study will have implications for marketers and policy makers in formulating marketing activities and policies.
- keywords
- Innovativeness, Environmental Concern, Environment-friendly Product Satisfaction, Environmentally friendly consumer, Innovativeness of Product
참고문헌
Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45-57.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In Search of The Marketing Imagination: Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products. Journal of Marketing Resaerch, 33(May), 174-187.
Barber, N., Kuo, P., Bishop, M., & Goodman Jr, R. (2012). Measuring psychographics to assess purchase intention and willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(4), 280–292.
Barr, S. (2007). Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435-473.
Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Faith in Others as Moderators of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79-89.
Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase aplug-in electric vehicle: a survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D, 18(January), 39-45.
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083.
Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M. R., & Park, J. (2019), Psychological and Behavioral Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Adoption and Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Early Adopters in China and Korea, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76(Nov), 1-18.
Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51(March), 250-260.
Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behaviors determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262–268.
Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA:Pearson Custom Publishing.
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental Psychology Matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(Jan), 541–79.
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157.
Graeff, T. R. (1996), Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 4-18.
Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A, 88(June), 40-57.
Heidenreich, S., Spieth, P., & Petschnig, M. (2017). Ready, Steady, Green: Examining the Effectiveness of External Policies to Enhance the Adoption of Eco-Friendly Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 343-359.
Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(Sept), 686-705.
Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283-295.
Howell, R. A. (2013). It’s not (just) “the environment, stupid!” Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles. Global Environmental Change. 23(1), 281-290.
Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
Jansson, J., Nordlund, A., & Westin K. (2017). Examining drivers of sustainable consumption: The influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154(15), 176-187
Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D, 25(Dec), 24–32.
Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding Scope of Hybrid Choice Models Allowing for Mixture of Social Influences and Latent Attitudes:Application to Intended Purchase of Electric Cars. Transportation Research Part A, 69(Nov), 71–85.
Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Cooper, R. G. (1991). The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 210-251.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520.
Leong, L. Y. C., Fischer, R., & McClure, J. (2014). Are nature lovers more innovative? The relationship between connectedness with nature and cognitive styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40(Dec), 57-63.
Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G. Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1980). Innovativeness:The Concept and Its Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(March), 229-242.
Miniero, G., Codini, A., Bonera, M., Corvi, E., & Bertoli, G. (2014). Being green: From attitude to actual consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 3(8), 521–528.
Morton, C., Anable, J., & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 18(March), 18-28.
Onel, N. (2014). Antecedents of environmentally sensitive consumer behaviors: An investigation of goal framing theory, Montclair State University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Ozaki, R. (2011). Adopting Sustainable Innovation: What Makes Consumers Sign up to Green Electricity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 1–17.
Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217–2227.
Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the value that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126-136.
Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 34(January), 122–136.
Sang, Y., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Clean Production, 92(1), 75-83.
Schwarz, N., & Ernst, A. (2009). Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations - An empirical approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(4), 497-511.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (2001). Crossfunctional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(February), 73-85.
Song, M., & Im, M. (2017). Moderating effects of food type and consumers’ atttitude on the evaluation of food items labeled “additive-free”. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), 1-12.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317
Stern, P. C. (2000), Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L., (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97.
Zimmer, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (1994). Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern, Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 63-74.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수