바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Social Supply Chain Practices and Companies Performance: An Analysis of Portuguese Industry

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.11, pp.53-62
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.11.201911.53
PINTO, Luisa

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to study the internal and external social practices of supply chain management along with economic and social performance of eight Portuguese companies from different industrial sectors. Through empirical data derived from eight case studies, five research propositions are suggested and tested. Research, design, data and methodology: The data was collected through 22 semi-structured interviews with general, procurement, and environmental/safety managers from eight companies from different industrial sectors. Secondary data was collected from reports, websites, and companies' internal documentation. Results: The analysis identifies the most important social practices considered by managers, as well as the performance measures that are most appropriate and most widely used to evaluate the influence of social practices on corporate economic and social performance. The results support four of the five propositions of this research. Companies' economic and social performance are affected by the implementation of social practices into the supply chain, namely the internal social practices. Conclusions: The findings confirmed that there is a positive relationship between internal social practices and economic performance. Internal social supply chain practices contribute to improve social performance. It also identifies the social practices which have negative effects on focal company performance.

keywords
Social Practices, Supply Chain, Sustainability, Performance, Case Study

Reference

1.

Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Production Management, 30(12), 1246–1268.

2.

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Green supplier development:Analytical evaluation using rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1200-1210.

3.

Beske, P., Koplin, J., & Seuring, S. (2008). The use of environmental and social standards by German first-tier suppliers of the Volkswagen AG. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 63-75.

4.

Carter, C., & Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution &Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.

5.

Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.

6.

Croom, S., Vidal, N., Spetic, W., Marshall, D., & McCarthy, L. (2018). Impact of social sustainability orientation and supply chain practices on operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2344-2366.

7.

De Brito, M. P., Carbone, V., & Blanquart, C. M. (2008). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 534-553.

8.

Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1(2), 130–141.

9.

Eisenhart, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

10.

Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques and J. Richardson (Eds). The triple bottom line, does it all add up? Assessing the sustainability of business and CSR, 1-16. London. Earthscan Publications Ltd.

11.

Gallear, D., Ghobadian, A., & Chen, W. (2012). Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance:An empirical examination. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 83-91.

12.

Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149-159.

13.

Gold, S., Seuring, S., & Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 230–245.

14.

Golini, R., Moretto, A., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2017). Developing sustainability in the Italian meat supply chain: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 1183-1209.

15.

GRI (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines available in https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Sustainability-Reporting-Guidelines.pdf.

16.

Gunasekaran A., Patel, C., & Mc Gaughey, R. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347.

17.

Hoejmose, S., & Adrien-Kirby, A. (2012). Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: A literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st Century. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(8), 232-242.

18.

Klassen, R., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103-115.

19.

Kleindorfer, R., Singhal, K., & Van Wassenhove, N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482-492.

20.

Köksal, D., Strähle, J., Müller, M., & Freise, M. (2017). Social sustainable supply chain management in the textile and apparel industry: A literature review. Journal of Sustainability, 9(1), 100.

21.

Longoni, A., Golini, R., & Cagliano, R. (2014). The role of new forms of work organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(A), 147-160.

22.

Mani, V., & Guanasekaran, A. (2018). Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging countries. International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, 199(C), 150-161.

23.

Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Supply chain social sustainability: A comparative case analysis in Indian manufacturing industries. Procedia Social Behavior Sciences, 189, 234–251.

24.

Mani, V., Guanaskeran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption in Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, 198(C), 149-164.

25.

Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution:Why now and what next?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(2), 205-228.

26.

Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37-46.

27.

Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2011). Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 47(6), 808-821.

28.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation:categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.

29.

Seuring, S. (2004). Integrated chain management and supply chain management: Comparative analysis and illustrative cases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8-10), 1059-1071.

30.

Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management: A Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455–466.

31.

Sink, D., & Tuttle, T. (1989). Planning and measurement in your organization of the future. Norcross, Ga: Industrial Engineering and Management Press.

32.

Sodhi, S., & Tang, S. (2018). Corporate social sustainability in supply chains: A thematic analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1), 882-901.

33.

Stiller, S., & Gold, S. (2014). Socially sustainable supply chain management practices in the Indian seed sector: A case study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 15(1), 52-67.

34.

Tajbakhsh, A., & Hassini, E. (2015). Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains: A review and research questions. International Journal Production Performance Management, 64(6), 744-783.

35.

Tang, C. (2018). Socially responsible supply chains in emerging markets: Some research opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 57(1), 1-10.

36.

Wittstruck, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2011). Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management:Empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(3), 141-158.

37.

Yawar, S. A., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: A literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, (141)3, 621-628.

38.

Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methodsapplied social research methods, (4th ed). California. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

39.

Zorzini, M., Hendry, L. C., Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2015). Socially responsible sourcing: Reviewing the literature and its use of theory. International Journal of Operations Production Management, 35(1), 60-109.

The Journal of Distribution Science