- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
The Moderating Effect of Bargain-proneness in Customer Evaluation of Retail Service
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of basic value satisfaction on service quality evaluation and customer loyalty and the moderating effect of Bargain-proneness in this process. Specifically, I analyzed the influence of basic value satisfaction, the mediating effect of service quality evaluation, and the moderated mediation effect of Bargain-proneness. Research design, data, and methodology - Data collection for this study was conducted for adults over 18 years of age with shopping experiences in traditional market within a month around the traditional market in the metropolitan area. A total of 250 questionnaire response data was obtained. Hypotheses were tested using SPSS. The PROCESS macro method was used to verify the mediating effect of the service quality evaluation on the relationship between basic value satisfaction and customer loyalty. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to analyze the moderated mediation effect of the bargain-proneness tendency. Results - Empirical results showed that the basic value satisfaction affected service quality evaluation and customer loyalty. Specifically, it has been found that it directly affects customer loyalty and indirectly influences through service quality evaluation. The moderated mediation effect of the bargain-proneness tendency in the process of basic value satisfaction affecting customer loyalty through service quality evaluation has been verified. In other words, the higher the bargain-proneness tendency, the more influence the basic value satisfaction has on the favorable service quality evaluation. Conclusions - This study contributed to the distribution literature in that it attempted a new empirical study considering the variable 'bargain-proneness tendency', which had not received much academic attention in the past. Furthermore, this study contributed academically in that it presented important moderating variables that should be paid attention in the field of distribution studies. In this study, bargain-proneness was used with a focus on traditional markets, but this variable could play an significant role in future offline distribution studies that should pay attention to meet hedonic needs of shopping. These results suggested that traditional market practitioners should focus on the basic value and that the bargain-prone consumer segment should be considered as a target.
- keywords
- Bargain-proneness, Basic Value, Service Quality, Customer Loyalty, Traditional Market
Reference
Andreassen, T. W., & Lindestad, B. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex services: The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(1), 7-23.
Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77-95.
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882.
Babakus, E., & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: An empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 26(6), 767-787.
Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(22), 328-339.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bloemer, J., & Ruyter, K. D. (1998). On the relationship between store image, store satisfaction and store loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5-6), 499-513.
Chang, T., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 16-27.
Dawra, J., Katyal, K., & Gupta, V. (2015). “Can you do something about the price?” – Exploring the indian deal and bargaining-prone customer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(5), 356-366.
Evans, K. R., & Beltramini, R. F. (1987). A theoretical model of consumer negotiated pricing: An orientation perspective. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 58-73.
Gillison, S. T., Northington, W. M., & Beatty, S. E. (2014). Understanding customer bargaining in retail stores: A customer perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2), 151-168.
Hackl, P., Scharitzer, D., & Zuba, R. (2000). Customer satisfaction in the austrian food retail market. Total Quality Management, 11(7), 999-1006.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
Jones, M. A., Trocchia, P. J., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (1997). Noneconomic motivations for price haggling: An exploratory study. Advances in Consumer Research, 24(1), 388-391.
Joy, A., & Li, E. P. H. (2012). Studying consumption behaviour through multiple lenses: An overview of consumer culture theory. Journal of Business Anthropology, 1(1), 141-173.
Kassaye, W. W. (1990). The role of haggling in marketing:An examination of buyer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 53-62.
Kim, P. (2017). A study on the recognition level of traditional market users on return intention. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(5), 77-85.
Kim, P., & Lee, J. (2016). A study on the effects of perceived quality on whitening cosmetics’ satisfaction and repurchase: Focused on university students. The East Asian Journal of Business Management (EAJBM), 6(2), 15-22.
Kramer, H. E., & Herbig, P. A. (1993). The suq model of haggling: Who, what, when and why? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 5(2), 55-68.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 54-67.
Luk, S. T., Sharma, P., & Chen, I. S. (2013). Shopping motivation as a moderator in the retail service evaluation. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(1), 40-48.
Mägi, A., & Julander, C. (1996). Perceived service quality and customer satisfaction in a store performance framework: An empirical study of swedish grocery retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 3(1), 33-41.
McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71-84.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863.
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21-35.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Sharma, V. M., & Krishnan, K. S. (2001). Recognizing the importance of consumer bargaining: Strategic marketing implications. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(1), 24-37.
Sherry, J. F. Jr. (1990). A sociocultural analysis of a midwestern american flea market. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 13-30.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-45.
Singh, D. P. (2014). Online shopping motivations, information search, and shopping intentions in an emerging economy. The East Asian Journal of Business Management (EAJBM), 4(3), 5-12.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1997). Retail service quality and perceived value: A comparison of two models. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 4(1), 39-48.
Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1990). The lived meaning of free choice: An existentialphenomenological description of everyday consumer experiences of contemporary married women. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 346-361.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 1-48.
Wong, A., & Sohal, A. (2003). Service quality and customer loyalty perspectives on two levels of retail relationships. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(5), 495-513.
Wu, P. C., Yeh, G. Y., & Hsiao, C. (2011). The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 19(1), 30-39.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations