바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Korean Retail Industry

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.6, pp.33-42
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.6.201906.33
KIM, Sang-Su
LEE, Jeong-Hwan

Abstract

Purpose - We investigate whether a firm's engagement in socially responsible activity affects the quality of financial reporting within the retail industry of Korean market. Recent studies argue that more socially responsible firms tend to show a better quality of financial reporting. Research design, data, and methodology - We use a variety of proxy variables related to the use of discretionary accruals and real activity manipulation to measure the quality of financial reporting. The total of environmental, social and governance score is used to represent the degree of socially responsible activity in the retail industry. We use regression models to examine whether more socially responsible firms show a higher quality of financial reporting. The sample of publicly traded Korea retail firms is analyzed from 2011 to 2016. Results - Our analysis finds supporting evidence for limited earning management via the use of discretionary accruals. We find, however, no significant relationship between the degree of social responsibility and the quality of financial reporting within chaebol affiliates unlike non-chaebol affiliates. Conclusions - Our results weakly support a better quality of financial reporting for more socially responsible firms. The results highlight the importance of firm characteristics in deciding the effect of socially responsible activity on corporate policies.

keywords
Chaebol Affiliates, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG Score, Retail Firms

Reference

1.

Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.

2.

Choi, H., & Moon, D. (2013). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Accounting Transparency. Korean Accounting Review, 38(1), 135-171.

3.

Chun, S., & Cho, E. (2017). Differentiation Strategy, CSR, And Real Activities Earnings Management: Evidence From Korea. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 33(4), 669-692.

4.

Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers'Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.

5.

Kim, I., & Venkatachalam, M. (2011). Are sin stocks paying the price for accounting sins? JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, AUDITING & FINANCE, 26(2), 415-442.

6.

Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761-796. doi:10.2308/accr-10209

7.

Lin, C.-S., Chang, R.-Y., & Dang, V. (2015). An integrated model to explain how corporate social responsibility affects corporate financial performance. Sustainability, 7(7), 8292-8311.

8.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.

9.

Miralles-Quirós, M., Miralles-Quirós, J., & Valente Gonçalves, L. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance:The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574.

10.

Park, H.-J., Shin, H.-h., Kang, D.-K., & Kwon, I.-S. (2004). Corporate Transparency and its Value. Korean Management. Review, 35(5), 31.

11.

Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of accounting and economics, 42(3), 335-370.

12.

Yoon, B., Lee, J., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.

13.

Yoon, B., & Lee, J. H. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Asymmetry in the Korean Market: Implications of Chaebol Affiliates. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(1), 21-31.

The Journal of Distribution Science