바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Empirical Study of Relationship between Product Market Competition Structure and Overvaluation

The Empirical Study of Relationship between Product Market Competition Structure and Overvaluation

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2020, v.18 no.2, pp.99-108
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.2.202002.99
CHA, Sang-Kwon (The Department of Accounting, Hanyang University)
PARK, Mi-Hee (Department of Tax Accounting, Yong-In Songdam College)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper investigated the relationship between market competition and firm valuation error. Furthermore, Additional analyses were made according to the quality of financial reports and the listed market. Through the process we confirm to the impact of competition on the capital market. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of competition on valuation errors. The preceding studies did not provide a consistent results of the effects of competing functions on the capital market. One view is that the competition could mitigate the information asymmetry, and the other is that monopolistic lessens the manager's involvement in financial reporting. This study is intended to expand the prior study by analyzing the impact of competition on the capital market and on the valuation of investors. Research design, data, and methodology: The analysis was conducted on 12,031 samples over 11 years from 2008 to 2018 using data from market in Korea. Here the valuation error was measured by the research methodology of Rhodes-Kropf, Robinson and Viswanathan (2005), and competition measured by Herfindahl-Hirschman Index multiplied by (-1), and Concentration Ratio by (-1). Results: We confirm that the positive relationship between competition and the valuation error. In addition, we also found that the positive relation between competition and valuation error was in cases of low discretionary accruals and the KOSDAQ market. This means that the net function of competition does not mitigate valuation errors. Conclusions. This study has the following contributions when compared to prior research. First, the relevance between the level of competition and the valuation of the entity was confirmed. The study by Haw, Hu and Lee (2015) suggested that monopolistic industry of analysts' forecast is more accurate due to lower the variability in earnings. This study magnified it to confirm that monopolistic lessen information uncertainty in valuation. Second, the study on valuation errors was expanded. While the study on the effect of valuation errors on the capital market is generally relatively active, it is different that competition degree has analyzed the effect on valuation errors amid the lack of research on the effect on valuation errors.

keywords
Product Market Competition, Market Concentration, Competition Structure, Retailing Management, Overvaluation

참고문헌

1.

Badertscher, B. A. (2011). Overvaluation and the choice of alternative earnings management mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1491-1518.

2.

Becker, C. L, DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K.R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.

3.

Cha, S. K., Hwang, S. P, & Kim, Y. B. Business Strategy and Overvaluation: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 81-88.

4.

Cha, S. K., & Choi, H. J. The Impact of Overvaluation on Analysts' Forecasting Errors. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 11(1), 41-49.

5.

Cheng, P., Man, P., & Yi, C. H. (2013). The impact of product market competition on earnings quality. Accounting &Finance, 53(1), 137-162.

6.

Chi, J. D., & Gupta, M. (2009). Overvaluation and earnings management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(9), 1652-1663.

7.

Chiou, C. L., & Shu, P. G. (2017). Overvaluation and the cost of bank debt. International Review of Economics & Finance, 48, 235-254.

8.

Coulton, J. J., Saune, N., & Taylor, S. L. (2015). Overvalued equity, benchmark beating and unexpected accruals. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), 989-1014.

9.

Dhaliwal, D., Huang, S., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. (2014). Product market competition and conditional conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1309-1345.

10.

Giroud, X., & Mueller, H. M. (2011). Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 66(2), 563-600.

11.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

12.

Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. W. (2014). Product market competition and earnings management: Evidence from discretionary accruals and real activity manipulation. Advances in Accounting, 30(2), 263-275.

13.

Li, X. (2010). The impacts of product market competition on the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(3), 663-711.

14.

Markarian, G., & Santaló, J. (2014). Product market competition, information and earnings management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(5-6), 572-599.

15.

Shin, I. H. (2019). Market Competition and Audit Quality in Distribution and Service Industries. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(4), 33-39.

16.

Rhodes–Kropf, M., Robinson, D. T., & Viswanathan, S. (2005). Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(3), 561-603.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)