바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Changes of Consumption Behavior in Bengkulu, Indonesia: Case of Purchasing Corona Prevention Products Through Indirect Ditribution Channel

The Changes of Consumption Behavior in Bengkulu, Indonesia: Case of Purchasing Corona Prevention Products Through Indirect Ditribution Channel

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.11, pp.27-36
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.11.202111.27
Hayu, Rina Suthia (Department of Economy and Business, University of Bengkulu)
Sulistiyawan, Edy (Department of Economy and Business, PGRI Adi Buana)
Salim, Muhartini (Department of Economy and Business, University of Bengkulu)

Abstract

Purpose: COVID-19, government regulation and social media have changed many aspects of life including consumption behavior. The influence of social media by spreading massive news about COVID-19 also have the impact toward emotions threat, perceived risk, and perceived value of consumption behavior in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the extent to which changes in the consumption behavior, mainly for purchasing of corona prevention products through indirect distribution channels. Research design, data and methodology: This research was descriptive quantitative using the IPA method with sample of people in Bengkulu Province. This study obtained 208 respondent data from questionnaires and tested the validity and reliability with corrected-item total correlation method. Results: The study found that COVID-19 pandemic and government regulation variable were in quadrant II, in quadrant III there were social media variable, emotions threat and perceived risk. Meanwhile, in quadrant IV there were perceived value variable. Conclusions: The findings indicated that COVID-19 and government regulation are the most variable that influence people to buy corona prevention product, meanwhile perceived value is the less influence variable. Therefore, government and marketers have to prepare strategic plan in order to raise people awareness to avoid corona by buying corona prevention product.

keywords
Government Regulation, COVID-19, Social Media, Emotions Threat, Perceived Risk, Perceived Value, Indirect Distribution Channel

참고문헌

1.

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Guinalíu, M. (2012). Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.001

2.

Bhukya, R., & Singh, S. (2015). The effect of perceived risk dimensions on purchase intention: An empirical evidence from Indian private labels market. American Journal of Business, 30(4), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-10-2014-0055

3.

Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252199

4.

Chang, E. C., & Tseng, Y. F. (2013). Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 864-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.012

5.

Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1964). Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making: The Case of Telephone Shopping. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150375

6.

DSouza, R. S., DSouza, S., Strand, N., Anderson, A., Vogt, M. N. P., & Olatoye, O. (2020). YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Global Public Health, 15(7), 935-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1761426

7.

DeMarrais & Lapan. (2004). Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. In London : LEA Publisher.

8.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., Grewal, D., Dodds, B., & Monroe, B. (1991). Effect of Price, Brand, and Store Information Buyers Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.

9.

Featherman, M. S., Miyazaki, A. D., & Sprott, D. E. (2010). Reducing online privacy risk to facilitate e-service adoption: The influence of perceived ease of use and corporate credibility. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011040622

10.

Glaeser, E. L., (2003). Psychology and The Market. Harvard Institute of Economic Research. 94(2), 408-413 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3592919

11.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Underson R.E., & Ronald, L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis : A Global Perspective (7th Edition). In New Jersey : Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.133

12.

Han, M. C., & Kim, Y. (2017). Why Consumers Hesitate to Shop Online: Perceived Risk and Product Involvement on Taobao.com. Journal of Promotion Management, 23(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2016.1251530

13.

Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456

14.

Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 714—725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.008

15.

Hoyer, W., Maccinnis D., Pieters, R. (2014). Consumer Behaviour 6th Ed. Consumer Behavior 6th Ed. United States of America: South-Western Cengage Learning.

16.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

17.

Kim, H. K., & Davis, K. E. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 490-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.001

18.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis an Introduction to Its Metodology 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publiction.

19.

Lazarus, R.S 7 Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping: A new synthesi. New York: Springer (Vol. 148).

20.

Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819

21.

Magal, R.S., & Levenburg, N. M. (2005). Using importance-performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small businesses. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 00(C), 176. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2005.661

22.

Martilla, J., & James, J. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis: An easily applied technique for measuring attribute importance and performance can further the development of effective marketing programs. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112

23.

Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for Brand-Related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046

24.

Nielsen. (2020). Race Against COVID-19: A Deep Dive on How Indonesian Consumers Are Reacting to the Virus. https://www.nielsen.com/id/en/insights/article/2020/race-against-covid-19-deep-dive-on-how-indonesian-consumers-react-towards-the-virus/ (Accessed Juni 2, 2020)

25.

Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.311

26.

Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal Components, Core Relational Themes, and the Emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3-4), 233-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409189

27.

Spais, G. S., & Vasileiou, K. (2006). Path Modeling The Antecedent Factors To Consumer Repurchase Intentions For Advanced Technological Food Products: Some Correlations Between Selected Factor Variables. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 2(2), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v2i2.4889

28.

Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014). Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Research, 24(3), 369-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2012-0244

29.

Wang, E. S. T. (2013). The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 41(10), 805-816. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2012-0113

30.

Wood, C. M., & Scheer, L. K. (1996). Incorporating Perceived Risk into Models of Consumer Deal Assessment and Purchase Intent. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(January), 399-404. http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/7867/volumes/v23 /NA-23

31.

Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_11

32.

Yu, H.S., Zang, J.J., Kim, D.H., Chen, K.K., Henderson, C., Min, S., & H. H. (2014). Service Quality, Perceived Value, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention Among Fitness Center Members Aged 60 Years and Over. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(2), 632-637. https://doi.org/https:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112

33.

Yu, S., & Lee, J. (2019). The effects of consumers perceived values on intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041034

34.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1983). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Blood, 62(5), 1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v62.5.1047.104

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)