바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Effects of Photo Decoration Cues on Online Consumers' Affective Responses in Distribution Science

The Effects of Photo Decoration Cues on Online Consumers’ Affective Responses in Distribution Science

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.12, pp.71-81
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.12.202112.71
SHIHUI, Huang (Department of Foundational Courses. Shandong Institute of Commerce and Technology)
FENG, Zhou (Department of Information Technology. Shandong Institute of Commerce and Technology)

Abstract

Purpose: This study to seek to answer two research questions in distribution science: what photo decoration cues in online grocery stores could be identified? Could photo decoration cues significantly effect on the affective perception and behavioral intention of consumers? Research design, data, and methodology: his study conducted a laboratory experiment with a 2×2×2 factorial design to validate the proposed research model and test our proposed hypotheses. Research design, data and methodology: Two stages experiments were adopted in this study, among 360 voluntaries who have had an experience of online grocery shopping, 331 valid data had been collected and analyzed using MANOVA and PLS-SEM algorism. Results: (1) both reflective surface and complementary goods layout lead to visual appeal and shopping enjoyment; (2) contrast color usage positively impacts on visual appeal while does not significantly affect shopping enjoyment; (3) consumers' affective responses positively impact attitudes toward product and store which in turn lead to purchase intention and store loyalty. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Conclusions: Using the media richness theory, visual rhetoric theory and visual design literature as the theoretical foundation, the study provides a solid foundation to comprehend the impact of photo design artifacts on consumers' affective responses when online consumers shopping online for fresh grocery.

keywords
Cue, attitude toward Product, attitude toward Store, Distribution Science

참고문헌

1.

Burke, R. (2002). Technology and the customer interface: What consumers want in the physical and virtual store. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 411-432.

2.

Cai, S., & Xu, Y. (2007). Effects of outcome, process and shopping enjoyment on online consumer behaviour. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5(4), 272-281.

3.

Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2002). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing, 77(4), 511-535.

4.

Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77.

5.

Cyr, D., Bonanni, C., Bowes, J., & Ilsever, J. (2005). Beyond trust:Web site design preferences across cultures. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 13(4), 25-54.

6.

Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information &Management, 43(8), 950-963.

7.

Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H., & Pan, B. (2009). Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach. MIS Quarterly, 539-566.

8.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science, 32(5), 554-571.

9.

Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance:Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 355-366.

10.

Davenport, T., & Beck, J. (2001). The attention economy:Understanding the new economy of business: Cambridge, MA:Harvard Business School Press.

11.

Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256.

12.

Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150.

13.

Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J., & Kim, J. (2005). For fun and profit:Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22(8), 669-694.

14.

Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43(1), 1-14.

15.

Griffith, D. A., Krampf, R. F., & Palmer, J. W. (2001). The role of interface in electronic commerce: Consumer involvement with print versus on-line catalogs. International journal of electronic commerce, 5(4), 135-153.

16.

Guido, Gianluigi, Capestro, Mauro, Peluso, & Alessandro, et al.(2007). Experimental analysis of consumer stimulation and motivational states in shopping experiences. International Journal of Market Research.

17.

Hoch, S. J., & Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 1-20.

18.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International journal of electronic commerce, 1(2), 59-88.

19.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitalec, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 45-71.

20.

Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Virtual product experience:Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 111-147.

21.

Zhenhui, (Jack), Jiang, Izak, & Benbasat. (2007). The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers' product understanding. Mis Quarterly.

22.

Kahai, S. S., & Cooper, R. B. (2003). Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality. Journal of Managemeni Information Systems, 20(1), 263-299.

23.

Karimov, F. P., Brengman, M., & Van Hove, L. (2011). The effect of website design dimensions on initial trust: A synthesis of the empirical literature. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 272.

24.

Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.

25.

Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293-311.

26.

Laroche, M., Yang, Z., McDougall, G. H., & Bergeron, J. (2005). Internet versus bricks-and-mortar retailers: An investigation into intangibility and its consequences. Journal of retailing, 81(4), 251-267.

27.

Lavie, T., Oron-Gilad, T., & Meyer, J. (2011). Aesthetics and usability of in-vehicle navigation displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1), 80-99.

28.

Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104.

29.

Lee, J. W., & Zhao, T. F. (2014). Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence from Chinese Stock Markets. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 1(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.13106/KODISAJournals.2014.vol1.no1.5.

30.

Lee, J. W., Kwag, M., & Potluri, R. M. (2015). Antecedents of Acceptance of Social Networking Sites in Retail Franchise and Restaurant Businesses. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.13106/KODISA Journals.2015.vol2.no1.29.

31.

Lightner, N. J., & Eastman, C. M. (2002). User Preference for Product Information in Remote Purchase Environments. J. Electron. Commerce Res., 3(3), 174-186.

32.

Lim, K. H., Benbasat, I., & Ward, L. M. (2000). The role of multimedia in changing first impression bias. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 115-136.

33.

Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & information technology, 25(2), 115-126.

34.

Liu, C., Arnett, K. P., Capella, L. M., & Taylor, R. D. (2001). Key dimensions of web design quality as related to consumer response. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(1), 70-77.

35.

Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International journal of electronic commerce, 11(3), 51-87.

36.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management science, 52(12), 1865-1883.

37.

Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of retailing, 77(1), 39-56.

38.

Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience. Journal of retailing, 78(1), 31-40.

39.

Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1992). Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 454-461.

40.

Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Voss, G. B., & Grewal, D. (2003). Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational, multichannel service provider. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 448-458.

41.

Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing science, 19(1), 22-42.

42.

Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), 695-719.

43.

Perea y Monsuwé, T., Dellaert, B. G., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review. International journal of service industry management, 15(1), 102-121.

44.

Raney, A. A., Arpan, L. M., Pashupati, K., & Brill, D. A. (2003). At the movies, on the web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive web content on site and brand evaluations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(4), 38-53.

45.

Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought:Cambridge university press.

46.

Rosen, D. E., & Purinton, E. (2004). Website design: Viewing the web as a cognitive landscape. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 787-794.

47.

Sarah Sungsook Song, M. K. (2012). Does More Mean Better An Examination Of Visual Product Presentation In E-Retailing. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 345-355.

48.

Scapin, D. L., & Bastien, J. C. (1997). Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behaviour & information technology, 16(4-5), 220-231.

49.

Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.

50.

Shavitt, S., Lowrey, P., & Haefner, J. (1998). Public attitudes toward advertising: More favorable than you might think. Journal of advertising research, 38(4), 7-22.

51.

Subramani, M. (2004). How Do Suppliers Benefit From Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45-73.

52.

Suh, K.-S., & Lee, Y. E. (2005). The effects of virtual reality on consumer learning: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 673-697.

53.

Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: An initial examination. Journal of retailing, 76(3), 309-322.

54.

Tan, F. B., Tung, L. L., & Xu, Y. (2009). A study of web-designers'criteria for effective business-to-consumer (b2c) websites using the repertory grid technique. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 10(3), 155.

55.

Turley, L. W., & Milliman, R. E. (2000). Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 193-211.

56.

Hans, V. D. H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 695-704.

57.

Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European journal of information systems, 12(1), 41-48.

58.

Vieira, V. A. (2010). Visual aesthetics in store environment and its moderating role on consumer intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(5), 364-380.

59.

Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., & Hess, T. J. (2011). What Signals Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 373-396.

60.

Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Yen, D. C. (2008). The atmospheric factors of online storefront environment design: An empirical experiment in Taiwan. Information & Management, 45(7), 493-498.

61.

Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996) The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251929

62.

Zhenhui. Jiang, I. B. (2007b). Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 454-470.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)