바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

Article Contents

Prev Next
Early Access e-Submission

Vol.20 No.1

Citation Share

User Responses Towards Information Distribution of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 Concerning Permits for Commercial Use of Music Performing Rights

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2022, v.20 no.1, pp.55-65
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.01.202201.55
MUHIDIASTU, Naufal
MANI, La
RASYID, Fariz Ubaidillah
ZHAFIRAH, Hanan
ARAS, Muhammad
MUHIDIASTU,, N. , MANI,, L. , RASYID,, F. U. , ZHAFIRAH,, H. , & ARAS,, M. (2022). User Responses Towards Information Distribution of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 Concerning Permits for Commercial Use of Music Performing Rights. The Journal of Distribution Science, 20(1), 55-65, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.01.202201.55

Abstract

Purpose: This article discusses public acceptance in the information distribution of Copyright Law no. 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021 in Indonesia concerning the commercial use of music. Hospitality industry is one of the most affected by this regulations, which some hotelsrefused to comply. To get royalties, LMKN approaches with socialization either directly or indirectly to commercial music users. Research design, data and methodology: Quantitative survey by distributing questionnaires, then testing the validity and reliability tests using the SmartPLS application. The population studied were Hotels on Java and Bali Island in Indonesia. The research sample is 100 hotels. Result: R-Square value of 0.706 for the construct (Y) User Response which means that (X) Socialization can explain the variance (Y) User Response of 70.3%. This shows that the level of influence (X) Socialization has an effect on (Y) User Response. Conclusion: User responses regarding the distribution information of the Act indicate the need for socialization, because socialization provides literacy to the public. More frequent socialization will provide a good opportunity to increase the response of commercial music users.

keywords
Socialization, Music Royalty, User Response, Distribution, Performing Rights

Reference

1.

Alvonco, J. (2014). Practical Communication Skill (Pertama). PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

2.

Bearce, D. H., & Bondanella, S. (2007). Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence. International Organization, 61(04), 703-733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070245

3.

Berger, B. A. (2009). Communication Skills for Pharmacists:Building Relationships. American Pharmacists Association.

4.

Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily:A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x

5.

Budi, S. C., Hidayat, Z., & Mani, L. (2021). The Effects of Experience and Brand Relationship to Brand Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Shopping Distribution of Consumer Philips Lighting Product in Indonesia. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.115

6.

Burgoon, M., & Ruffner, M. (2002). Human Communication. Allyn & Bacon Inc.

7.

Cadden, T., Cao, G., Yang, Y., McKittrick, A., McIvor, R., & Onofrei, G. (2021). The effect of buyers’ socialization efforts on the culture of their key strategic supplier and its impact on supplier operational performance. Production Planning &Control, 32(13), 1102-1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1785574

8.

Chang, J., & Kim, T. (2018). Looking at Organizational Socialization from the Developmental Network Perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no3.195

9.

Checkel, J. T. (2005). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 59(04), 801-826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289

10.

Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4), 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047

11.

Cziko, G. (2000). The things we do: Using the lessons of Bernard and Darwin to understand the what, how, and why of our behavior. MIT press.

12.

Dane, C., Feist, A., & Laing, D. (1996). The value of music. London: National Music Council, 112.

13.

Dane, C., & Manton, K. (2002). Counting The Notes. London National Music Council.

14.

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi, Bandung: PT. In Citra Aditya Bakti.

15.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2000). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (4th Ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.001

17.

Garlin, F. V., & Owen, K. (2006). Setting the tone with the tune: A meta-analytic review of the effects of background music in retail settings. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.013

18.

Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2016). How Socialization Attenuates Tax Competition. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000246

19.

Giletta, M., Burk, W. J., Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Direct and Indirect Peer Socialization of Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036

20.

Goi, M. T., Kalidas, V., & Yunus, N. (2018). Mediating roles of emotion and experience in the stimulus-organism-response framework in higher education institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1425231

21.

Groome, D. (1999). An introduction to cognitive psychology:Processes and disorders. Psychology Press.

22.

Haug, J. K., & Stigson, P. (2016). Local Acceptance and Communication as Crucial Elements for Realizing CCS in the Nordic Region. Energy Procedia, 86(2), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.032

23.

He, G., Boas, I. J. C., Mol, A. P. J., & Lu, Y. (2018). What drives public acceptance of chemical industrial park policy and project in China? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.023

24.

Heath, R. L. (2013). Encyclopedia of public relations. Sage Publications.

25.

Kemp, E. A., Williams, K., Min, D. J., & Chen, H. (2019). Happy feelings: examining music in the service environment. International Hospitality Review, 33(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-10-2018-0019

26.

Kim, P. J. (2017). A Study on the Recognition Level of Traditional Market Users on Return Intention. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(5), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2017.vol8.no5.77.

27.

Kim, S. H., & Yoo, B. K. (2015). Analysis of the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in a Family Restaurant Chain. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(5), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.5.201505.103

28.

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.

29.

Nanayakkara, G. (2017). Promise and perils of Sri Lankan performers’ rights: the royalty collection in music. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 23(1), 1-29.

30.

Narud, H. M., & Esaiasson, P. (2013). Between-election democracy:The representative relationship after election day. ecpr Press.

31.

Neuman, W. L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Indeks.

32.

Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C. (2013). Do people “like” politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-scale direct candidate-tovoter online communication as an outlier phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7(1), 24.

33.

Öhberg, P., & Naurin, E. (2016). Party-constrained Policy Responsiveness: A Survey Experiment on Politicians’Response to Citizen-initiated Contacts. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000010

34.

Park, S. K., Kwak, K. T., & Lee, B. G. (2019). Policy compliance and deterrence mechanism in the sharing economy. Internet Research, 29(5), 1124-1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0098

35.

Petrova, M. A. (2016). From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework — VESPA — For organizing and interpreting community concerns. Renewable Energy, 86(2), 1280-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.047

36.

Pitt, I. L. (2010). Superstar effects on royalty income in a performing rights organization. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-010-9123-1

37.

Schmidt, A., & Donsbach, W. (2016). Acceptance factors of hydrogen and their use by relevant stakeholders and the media. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(8), 4509-4520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.058

38.

Sevilla, C. G. (2007). Research Methods (Quezon City: Rex Printing Company).

39.

Shang, L. (2015). Enjoy your online music carefully: collective management of music copyrights in the USA. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(-2), 58-77.

40.

Shin, & Joo, J. (2015). Relationships between Customer Socialization, Customer Participation, and Loyalty of On-line Service Providers. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(11), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.11.201511.15

41.

Siegrist, M. (2000). The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020

42.

Stiff, J. B., & Mongeau, P. A. (2016). Persuasive communication. Guilford Publications.

43.

Stigka, E. K., Paravantis, J. A., & Mihalakakou, G. K. (2014). Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: A review of contingent valuation applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32(4), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.026

44.

Sugiono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

45.

Suryabrata, S. (2000). Metode Penelitian [Research methods]. In PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

46.

Tausczik, Y., Farzan, R., Levine, J., & Kraut, R. (2018). Effects of Collective Socialization on Newcomers’ Response to Feedback in Online Communities. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191834

47.

Upham, P., Oltra, C., & Boso, À. (2015). Towards a crossparadigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 8(4), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003

48.

Vaske, J. J., Absher, J. D., & Bright, A. D. (2007). Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review, 14(2), 223-232.

49.

Vieira, V. A. (2013). Stimuli–organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.009

50.

Wagner, C. L., & Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2008). Does Community - Based Collaborative Resource Management Increase Social Capital? Society & Natural Resources, 21(4), 324-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701864344

51.

Westerberg, V., Jacobsen, J. B., & Lifran, R. (2015). Offshore wind farms in Southern Europe–Determining tourist preference and social acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 10(6), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.005

52.

Xenos, M. A., Macafee, T., & Pole, A. (2017). Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns: A study of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections. New Media &Society, 19(6), 826-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616617

53.

Xu, J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2014). The nature and consequences of trade-offtransparency in the context of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 379-406.

54.

Yoon, S. J. (2021). Role of Social Capital and Consumer Citizenship on Sharing Economy Participation on O2O Retail Platforms. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(10), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.10.202110.55

The Journal of Distribution Science

Early Access e-Submission OA Policy