바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Work Motive Distribution of Public Universities Lecturers in Hanoi

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2022, v.20 no.11, pp.71-78
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.11.202211.71
PHAM, Ngoc Thach
BUI, Van Huyen
HA, Dieu Linh
LE, Thi Lan Huong

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to investigate the impact of factors affecting the work motive distribution of public universities lecturers in Hanoi. Research design, data and methodology: The questionnaire survey method is applied in this research to analyze the relationship between the variables and verify the hypothesis based on the collected 306 valid questionnaires. The partial least square method structural equation model (PLS-SEM) is used to carry out structural equation modeling to study the relationship between latent variables with reliable tools (SmartPLS 3.0 software). Results: The research results show that the intrisic motivation of the lecturers, the extrisic motivation of the lecturers and the job characteristics of the lecturers all have a positive impact on the motivation of public universities lecturers in Hanoi. In which, intrinsic motivation has the greatest influence on the work motive distribution of lecturers. In addition, the research results also prove that job characteristics affect the work motive distribution of lecturers. This is a new factor in the factors affecting the work motive distribution of public universities lecturers. Conclusion: Based on the research results, the authors propose some recommendations to increase the work motive distribution of public universities lecturers in Hanoi through improving the factors affecting their work motive distribution.

keywords
Public Universities Lecturers, Job Characteristics, Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation, Work Motive Distribution

Reference

1.

Deci, E.L. (1975). Conceptualizations of Intrinsic Motivation. In: Intrinsic Motivation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9_2.

2.

Deci, E. L., & Möller, A. C. (2005). The Concept of Competence: A Starting Place for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determined Extrinsic Motivation. Teoksessa Elliot, AJ, Dweck, CS & Yeager, DS (toim.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (s. 579‒597).

3.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (pp. 11-40). Springer, Boston, MA.

4.

Deemer, E. D., Martens, M. P., & Buboltz, W. C. (2010). Toward a tripartite model of research motivation: Development and initial validation of the Research Motivation Scale. Journal of career assessment, 18(3), 292-309.

5.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

6.

Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of educational psychology, 81(2), 143-154.

7.

Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152.

8.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.

9.

Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (ed.): Pearson Prentice Hall.

10.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.

11.

Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction?. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(4), 309-336.

12.

McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). Arousing the achievement motive and obtaining imaginative stories. In D. C. McClelland, J. W. Atkinson, R. A. Clark, & E. L. Lowell, The achievement motive (pp. 97–106). Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-003.

13.

Robescu, O., & Iancu, A. G. (2016). The effects of motivation on employees performance in organizations. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 7(2), 49-56.

14.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

15.

Sharma, R. D., & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job satisfaction of university teachers: An empirical study. Journal of Services Research, 9(2), 51-80.

16.

Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 24(12), 1319-1331.

17.

Stee, R.M & Porter, L.W (1983). Motivation: New directions for theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 80-88.

18.

Tan, P. T., & Hoa, D. T. (2018). Factors influencing work motive distribution of lecturers in Vietnam National University of Forestry. Journal of Forestry Science and Technology, 3, 84-93.

19.

Wang, L. (2010). Higher education governance and university autonomy in China. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(4), 477-495.

The Journal of Distribution Science