바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.20 No.12

Citation Share

Liquidity and Skewness Risk in Stock Market: Does Measurement of Liquidity Matter?

Liquidity and Skewness Risk in Stock Market: Does Measurement of Liquidity Matter?

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2022, v.20 no.12, pp.81-87
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.12.202212.81
CHEUATHONGHUA, Massaporn (Department of Finance, Faculty of Business Administration)
WATTANATORN, Woraphon (Department of Finance, Thammasat Business School, Thammasat University)
NATHAPHAN, Sarayut (Department of Finance, Mahidol International College, Mahidol University)
CHEUATHONGHUA, Massaporn, WATTANATORN, Woraphon, & NATHAPHAN, Sarayut. (2022). Liquidity and Skewness Risk in Stock Market: Does Measurement of Liquidity Matter?. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 20(12), 81-87, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.12.202212.81

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the relationship between stock liquidity and skewness risk-tail risk (stock price crash risk) in an emerging market, in which problems on liquidity are more severe than in developed markets. Research design, data, and methodology: Based on the Thai market stock exchange over the period of 2000 to 2019, our sample include 13,462 firm-period observations. We employ a panel regression models regarding to five liquidity measures. These five liquidity measures cover three dimensions of liquidity namely the volume-based, price-based, and transaction cost-based measures for the liquidity-tail risk relationship. Results: We find a positively significant relationship between stock liquidity and tail risk in all cases. The finding here shows that the higher the stock liquidity, the larger the tail risk is. Conclusion: As the prior studies show inconclusive effect of stock liquidity on stock price crash risk, we demonstrate that mixed results found in prior studies are probably driven from the type of liquidity measure. The stock liquidity-tail risk association is present in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The results remain the same regardless of the definition of tail risk and liquidity factors. An endogeneity issue is addressed by employing the two-stage least squares regression.

keywords
Stock Price Crash Risk, Liquidity Measure, Emerging Market, Non-Normal Distribution, Skewness Risk, Tail Risk

참고문헌

1.

Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.

2.

Bali, T. G., Peng, L., Shen, Y., & Tang, Y. (2014). Liquidity shocks and stock market reactions. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1434-1485.

3.

Bédard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13-35.

4.

Chang, X., Chen, Y., & Zolotoy, L. (2017). Stock liquidity and stock price crash risk. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), 1605-1637.

5.

Chauhan, Y., Kumar, S., & Pathak, R. (2017). Stock liquidity and stock prices crash-risk: Evidence from India. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 41, 70-81.

6.

Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes:Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381.

7.

Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(1), 3-28.

8.

Chung, K. H., & Chuwonganant, C. (2018). Market volatility and stock returns: The role of liquidity providers. Journal of Financial Markets, 37, 17-34.

9.

Cohen, L. J., Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2014). Bank earnings management and tail risk during the financial crisis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(1), 171-197.

10.

Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Li, L. (2016). Abnormal real operations, real earnings management, and subsequent crashes in stock prices. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46(2), 217-260.

11.

Habib, A., Hasan, M. M., & Jiang, H. (2018). Stock price crash risk:review of the empirical literature. Accounting & Finance, 58, 211-251.

12.

Huang, S., & Liu, H. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese energy firms. Energy economics, 101, 105431.

13.

Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86.

14.

Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of financial Economics, 79(2), 257-292.

15.

Kang, W., & Zhang, H. (2014). Measuring liquidity in emerging markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 27, 49-71.

16.

Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 713-730.

17.

Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 963-1008.

18.

Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P., & Trzcinka, C. A. (1999). A new estimate of transaction costs. Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 1113-1141.

19.

Pástor, Ľ., & Stambaugh, Robert F. (2003). Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 642-685.

20.

Roll, R. (1984). A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market. The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1127-1139.

21.

Seifert, B., & Gonenc, H. (2010). Pecking Order Behavior in Emerging Markets. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 21(1), 1-31.

22.

Vo, X. V. (2020). Foreign investors and stock price crash risk:Evidence from Vietnam. International review of finance, 20(4), 993-1004.

23.

Wattanatorn, W., & Nathaphan, S. (2020). A new dimension of investment forecasting: evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 22(3), 429-446.

24.

Wattanatorn, W., & Nathaphan, S. (2022). Do bank-affiliated funds perform better than the others: the higher moment approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(4), 1075-1089.

25.

Wattanatorn, W., Padungsaksawasdi, C., Chunhachinda, P., & Nathaphan, S. (2020). Mutual fund liquidity timing ability in the higher moment framework. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101105.

26.

Wattanatorn, W., & Padungsaksawasdi, C. (2022). Stock price crash risk: the role of systematic skewness. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 15(1), 78-93.

27.

Wattanatorn, W. and Padungsaksawasdi, C. (2022), The board effectiveness index and stock price crash risk, Managerial Finance, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 126-135.

28.

Wattanatorn, W., & Tansupswatdikul, P. (2019). An ability to forecast market liquidity – Evidence from South East Asia Mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 5(1), 22-32.

29.

Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책