Factors Affecting the Distribution of Intellectual Potential and Returns in Kazakhstan

KIREYEVA,, A. A. , KANGALAKOVA,, D. M. , AINAKUL,, N. , & TSOY,, A. (2022). Factors Affecting the Distribution of Intellectual Potential and Returns in Kazakhstan. The Journal of Distribution Science, 20(2), 55-64, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.02.202202.55

copy

Abstract

Purpose: This research is aimed to study the level of the intellectual potential distribution, as well as the correlation between economic growth and key indicators of intellectual potential in each region of Kazakhstan. A review of the conceptual framework shows that there is a large body of research evaluating the level of intellectual potential in different ways based on different factors. Research design, data, and methodology: The research methodology is divided into two groups the integral index method using the normalization of indicators, weighting, and ranking; the method of correlation analysis. By the proposed methodological approaches, were calculated a set of factors affect the distribution of the intellectual potential. Statistics are taken for indicators of development of the intellectual potential for 2011-2020 from the Bureau of National Statistics. Results: Ranking results showed gaps between regions in Kazakhstan by the level of intellectual potential. Correlation analysis results revealed a statistically significant relationship on expenditures on R&D, computer literacy, innovative products, number of PhD students, and cultural and leisure indicators. Conclusions: Based on the obtained results of the intellectual potential level development there were given recommendations for the reproduction and regulation of the intellectual potential in the future.

keywords: Distribution, Intellectual Potential, Science, Education, Innovation, Kazakhstan

Reference

Agasisti, T., Egorov, A., Zinchenko, D.I., & Leshukov, O.V. (2020). The efficiency of regional higher education systems and regional economic short-run growth: empirical evidence from Russia. Industry and Innovation, 28, 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1738914

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978%2891%2990020-T

Alexiou, C. (2009). Government spending and economic growth:Econometric evidence from south-eastern Europe (SEE). Journal of Economic and Social Research, 11(1), 1-16.

Anyanwu, J. C. (2014). Factors affecting economic growth in Africa: Are there any lessons from China? African Development Review, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12105.

Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta, analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939

Bapna, R., Langer, N., Mehra, A., Gopal, R., & Gupta, A. (2013). Human capital investments and employee performance: an analysis of it services industry. Management Science, 59(3), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1586.

Bureau of National Statistics (2021). Annual statistical collections of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from BNC https://stat.gov.kz/official/industry/11/statistic/6

Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., & Kmecova, I. (2020). An Analysis of Intellecutal Potential and its Impact on the Social and Economic Development of European Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.02

Bryhinets, O., Shapoval, R., Bakhaieva, A., Pchelin, V., &Fomenko, A. (2021). Problems of intellectual property in the national security system of the country. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 471-486. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(30)

10.

Carayannis, E. G. (2004). Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1(1/2), 49-67. doi:10.1504/IJNKM.2004.005102

11.

Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2014). Knowledge, innovation and productivity gains across European regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1788-1804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.917167

12.

Cammarano, A., Caputo, M., Lamberti, E., & Michelino, F. (2017). Open innovation and intellectual property: A knowledgebased approach. Management Decision, 55(6), 1182-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0203

13.

Cho, J. (2020). Intellectual structure evolution of open access research observed through correlation index of keyword centrality. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2617-2635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03682-4

14.

Davenport, S., & Bibby, D. (1999). Rethinking a national innovation system: the small country as “SME”. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(3), 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373299107447

15.

De Gregorio, J. D., & J. W. Lee. (2002). Education and Income Inequality: New Evidence from Cross-Country Data. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4991.00060

16.

Dettori, B., Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2012). Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions. Regional Studies, 46(10), 1401-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529288

17.

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, Harper Business:New York.

18.

European Commission (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, suitable and inclusive growth, Brussels: European Commission.

19.

Földvári, P., & Van Leeuwen, B. (2011). Should Less Inequality in Education Lead to a More Equal Income Distribution? Education Economics, 19(5), 537-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2010.488472

20.

Gerasimov, V., Sharafutdinov, R., Kolmakov, V., Erzinkyan, E., Adamenko, A., & Vasilyeva, A. (2019). Control in the human capital management system in the strategy of innovative development of a region. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1074-1088. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(20)

21.

Grandinetti, R. (2016). Absorptive capacity and knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2016.2

22.

He, L., Tao, J., Meng, P., Chen, D., Yan, M., & Vasa, L. (2021). Analysis of socio-economic spatial structure of urban agglomeration in China based on spatial gradient and clustering. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 789-819. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.026

23.

Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61(6), 1247-1280. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951642

24.

Hoon Yi, M., & ShinMah, J. (2016). R&D Expenditure, International Trade and Economic Growth: Korea’s Experience. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(3), 39-44. 10.15722/jds.14.3.201603.39

25.

Jaffe, A. В. (2000). The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 531-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333%2899%2900088-8

26.

Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jędrych, A., & Mroczek-Dąbrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems –Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research, 20(3), 77–94. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/cer-2017-0021.

27.

Libanova, E. (2019). Labour Migration from Ukraine: Key Features, Drivers and Impact. Economics and Sociology, 12(1), 313-368. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019%2F12-1%2F19

28.

Lynch, L.M., & Black, S. (1995). Beyond the Incidence of Training:Evidence from a National Employers Survey. NBER Working Paper, 5231. https://doi.org/10.3386/W5231

29.

Kireyeva, A., Abilkayir, N.A., & Tsoy, A.A. (2018). A Study on the Distribution of Information and High Technology Clusters:Kazakhstan’s Experience. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.16.4.201804.5

30.

Limaj, E., & Bernroider, E.W. (2019). The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.052

31.

Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D.H., & Weil, D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477

32.

Mithas, S., & Lucas, H. C. (2010). Are Foreign IT Workers Cheaper? US Visa Policies and Compensation of Information Technology Professionals. Management Science, 56(5), 745-765. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1149

33.

Mishchuk, H., & Grishnova, O. (2015). Empirical study of the comfort of living and working environment – Ukraine and Europe: comparative assessment. Journal of International Studies, 8(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015%2F8-1%2F6

34.

Mohanty, B., Bhanumurthy, N.R., & Dastidar, A. (2018). What explains regional imbalances in public infrastructure expenditure? Evidence from Indian states. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 24(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.18356/1E6E07B2-EN

35.

Riihelaninen, J. M. (2013). Government Education Expenditure in the European Union during the Economic Crisis (2008-2011). Europe: European Union.

36.

Schiuma, G., & Lerro, A. (2008). Knowledge-based capital in building regional innovation capacity. Journal Knowledge Management, 12(5), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810902984

37.

Slaughter, S., Ang, S., & Boh, W.F. (2007). Firm‐specific human capital and compensation organizational tenure profiles:An archival analysis of salary data for it. Human Resource Management, 46(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRM.20169

38.

Suksod, P., & Cruthaka, C. (2020). The Relationship between Human Resources Practices and Organizational Performance in Pharmaceutical Industry of Thailand. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(3), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.5530/SRP.2020.3.08

39.

Yeh‐Yun Lin, C., & Edvinsson, L. (2008), National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913140

40.

Yessentay, A., Kireyeva, A.A., Khalitova, M., & Abilkayir, N.A. (2020). Financing of healthcare facilities in pension system assets of ecologically problematic regions in Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.531

41.

Yuwono, W. (2021). Empirical analysis of intellectual capital, potential absorptive capacity, realized absorptive capacity and cultural intelligence on innovation. Management Science Letters, 11, 1399-1406. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.10.034

42.

Zbuchea, A., Pînzaru, F., Busu, M., Stan, S.O., & Bârgăoanu, A. (2019). Sustainable Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Performances of Biotechnology Organizations. Sustainability, 11(2), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11020359

43.

Zygmunt, A. (2019). External linkages and intellectual assets as indicators of firms’ innovation activities: results from the Czech Republic and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.015

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.20 No.2

Factors Affecting the Distribution of Intellectual Potential and Returns in Kazakhstan

Abstract

Reference

The Journal of Distribution Science