바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Improvement of Youth Housing Support Policy

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2020, v.11 no.11, pp.29-38
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no11.29
KIM, Sun-Ju
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: The problem of housing poverty among young people is a very important problem for the nation. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to identify the problems of the government's housing support policy for young people. And it is in presenting specific solutions by fully reflecting the opinions of experts. Research design, data and methodology: This study consisted of analyzing the following three research topics: 1) the differences of youth residential support housing policy impact on young adults' housing stability, 2) the problems and solutions of youth housing support policy, and 3) the differences of experts' opinions on the impact of government policy on youth housing stability. The subject of this study is the government's seven housing policies for young people. The targets include Happy Public Rental Housing (Happiness Housing), Station Area Rental Housing for youth (Station Area 2030), Public Dormitory for College Students (Public Dormitory & Hope Dormitory), Jeonse Rental Housing for College Students (Subject Lease Rental Housing for College Students), Social Housing for Young People, and Share House. The data was organized through expert surveys from 1st to 30th June 2020. The experts surveyed include professors & researchers, public officer & public institutions staff, and private developers of young adults' housing. The methodology of analysis on the problem and the solution of government policy was Frequency analysis. And analysis methods on differences of experts' opinion were ANOVA, Levene' test, and Schefe test. Results: Problems in Government's youth residential support housing policy include high rents, lack of supply, difficulty in acquiring rental housing, inconvenience in using shared spaces, conflicts with cohabitants, and invasion of privacy. Solutions include expanding supply to urban areas, establishing long-term plans, securing privacy, diversifying business methods, establishing platforms for rental housing transactions, and expanding various public support (financial support, etc). Conclusions: There was a difference in perception among groups of experts on the impact of public rental housing (called 'happiness housing') in youth housing stability. It is very urgent to come up with the most reasonable policy to support youth housing. This requires in-depth discussions by experts to narrow their differences.

keywords
Youth Housing Support Policy, ANOVA, Levene Test, Schefe Test

Reference

1.

Ahn, H. M., & Park, D. B. (2018). Donor Country's Fiscal Status and ODA Decisions before and after 2008 G lobal Financial Crisis. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9 (1), 10-15.

2.

Cha, Y. R., & Kwon, Y . J. (2018). Why Korean Young Women Consumers Buy Luxury Goods? The Influence of Cultural Orientation and Media Use. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 8 (2), 23-32.

3.

Curry, S. R., & Abrams, L. S. (2015). Housing and Social Support for Youth Aging Out of Foster Care: State of the Research Literature and Directions for Future Inquiry. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 32 , 143-153.

4.

Druta, O., & Ronald, R. (2020). Living alone together in Tokyo share houses. Social & Cultural Geography, 21, 1-19.

5.

Forrest, R., & Xian S. (2018). Accommodating discontent: youth, conflict and the housing question in Hong Kong. Journal Housing Stud ies, 33 , 1-17.

6.

Han, J. H., Cheong, S. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2016). The Housing Development Directions based on the Housing Needs of Middle aged Single person Households. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 32 (7), 3-12.

7.

He, Y . (2 019). A Study on the Mutual Effect between Small & Medium sized Enterprises and Economic Growth: Evidence from Alibaba Group and City of Hangzhou . Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 9 (2), 27-34.

8.

Kim, M. J., & Kim, E. H. (2017) Differe nces in Perceived Risk and Product Attitudes: Focus on Korea and Thailand Consumers. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8 (6), 34-41.

9.

Kim, S. H., Song, M. H., Jeon, S. H., Choei, N. Y., & Bak, M. H. (2018). The Quantification of the Up zoning Criteria for Seoul's Youth Housing Sites via the Space Syntax Method. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX, 48 (1), 215-228.

10.

Kim, J. J. (2017). Social Support Analysis on Economic Activity Intention for Korean Chinese in Korea. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8 (3), 6-11.

11.

Kim, S. K. (2004). Change in Fertility Rates in Korea: Causes and Future Prospect. Korea journal of population studies, 27 (2), 1-34.

12.

Kim, Y., & Choi, E (2013). Spatio Temporal Changes and Characteristics of Households Failing to Meet the New Minimum Housing Standard in Seoul Metropolitan (1995~2010). Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 48 (4), 509-532

13.

Kuhar, M., & Reiter, H. (2012). Frozen transitions to adulthood of young people in Slovenia? Sociologija, 2, 211 226.

14.

Lee, H. J., & Ronald, R. (2012). Expansion, Diversification, and Hybridization in Korean Public Housing. Journal Housing Studies, 27 , 495-513.

15.

Lee, Y. S., & Park, J. H (2018). Trends of Supportive Housing Policy and Development in New York, USA Fo cused on Supportive Housing Network New York 2017 Conference and Expert Interviews. Journal of the Korean Housing Association. 29 (4), 1−14.

16.

Maalsen, S. (2019). I cannot afford to live alone in this city, and I enjoy the company of others: why people are sh are housing in Sydney. Australian Geographer, 50 (3), 315-332.

17.

Mackie, P. K. (2016). Young people and housing: Identifying the key issues. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16 (2), 137-143.

18.

Mckee, K. (2012). Young people, homeownership and future welf are. Housing Studies, 27 (6), 853-862.

19.

Minguez, A. (2016). Economic crisis and the new housing transitions of young people in Spain. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16 (2), 165-183.

20.

Oh, J., & Choi, J. M. (2014). A Study on the Demand Characteristic s and Influence Factors Affecting Shared House in Korea. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25 (3), 63-72.

21.

Park, Y. S., Kwon, L. S., & Choi, E.M. (2019). Effectiveness of Learning Performances According to Financial Motivation of University Student s. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 9 (3), 27-38.

22.

Seo, B. Y., & Joo, Y. M. (2018). Housing the very poor or the young? Implications of the changing public housing policy in South Korea. Journal Housing Studies, 33 , 1227-1245.

23.

Shirahase, S. (2010). Japan as a Stratified Society: With a Focus on Class Identification. Social Science Japan Journal, 13(1), 31-52.

24.

Yang, H. C., & Tasnuva, T . (2013). Issues of Workplace in Korea: How to Inspire Temporary Workers? Journal of Business Economic s and Environmental Studies, 3 (1), 23-27.

25.

Zhang, H., Li, S. K., & Kong, Y. (2016). Elasticity of Demand for Urban Housing in Western China Based on Micro data A Case Study of Kunming. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7 (3), 20-27.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business