바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on the Korean Onion Market

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2020, v.11 no.3, pp.39-50
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no3.39
BAEK, Ho-Seung
KIM, In-Seck

Abstract

Purpose: Agriculture, which is heavily influenced by climate conditions, is one of the industries most affected by climate change. In this respect, various studies on the impact of climate change on the agricultural market have been conducted. Since climate change is a long-term phenomenon for more than a decade, long-term projections of agricultural prices as well as climate variables are needed to properly analyze the impact of climate change on the agricultural market. However, these long-term price projections are often major constraints on studies of climate changes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of climate changes on the Korean onion market using ex-post analysis approach in order to avoid the difficulties of long-term price projections. Research design, data and methodology: This study develops an annual dynamic partial equilibrium model of Korean onion market. The behavioral equations of the model were estimated by OLS based on the annual data from 1988 to 2018. The modelling system is first simulated to have actual onion market conditions from 2014 to 2018 as a baseline and then compared it to the scenario assuming the climatic conditions under RCP8.5 over the same period. Scenario analyses were simulated by both comparative static and dynamic approach to evaluate the differences between the two approaches. Results: According to the empirical results, if the climate conditions under RCP8.5 were applied from 2014 to 2018, the yield of onion would increase by about 4%, and the price of onion would decrease from 3.7% to 17.4%. In addition, the average price fluctuation rate over the five years under RCP8.5 climate conditions is 56%, which is more volatile than 46% under actual climate conditions. Empirical results also show that the price decreases have been alleviated in dynamic model compared with comparative static model. Conclusions: Empirical results show that climate change is expected to increase onion yields and reduce onion prices. Therefore, the appropriate countermeasures against climate change in Korean onion market should be found in the stabilization of supply and demand for price stabilization rather than technical aspects such as the development of new varieties to increase productivity.

keywords
Climate change, Onion, Ex-post analysis, Dynamic partial equilibrium model

Reference

1.

Abdul-Razak, M., & Kruse, S. (2017). The adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change in the Northern Region of Ghana. Climate Risk Management, 17, 104-122.

2.

Adams, R. M., Hurd, B. H., Lenhart, S., & Leary, N. (1998). Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review. Climate Research, 11, 19-30.

3.

Afroz, R., Muhibbullak, M., & Morshed, M. N. (2019). Factors Affecting the Intention of the Rice Farmers to Adopt the Integrated Cash Waqf Environmental Protection Model: An Empirical Study in Kedah Malaysia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 189-199.

4.

Amamoua, H., Sassib, M.B., Aouadic, H., Khemirid, H., Mahouachie, M., Beckersa, Y., & Hammamia, H. (2018). Climate change-related risks and adaptation strategies as perceived in dairy cattle farming systems in Tunisia. Climate Risk Management, 20, 38–49.

5.

Baldos, U. L. C., & Hertel, T. W. (2014) Global food security in 2050: the role of agricultural productivity and climate change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 58, 554-570.

6.

Bosello, F., Eboli, F., & Pierfederici, R. (2012). Assessing the Economic Impacts of Climate Change - An Updated CGE Point of View. FEEM Working Paper No. 2. 2012. Retrieved November 1, 2019, from https://www.feem.it/en/publications.

7.

Burck, J., Hagen, U., Hohne, N., Nascimento, L., & Bals, C. (2019). The Climate Change Performance Index 2020. Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute & Climate Action Network. Retrieved December 15, 2019, from https://www.climate-change-performance-index.org/theclimate- change-performance-index-2020.

8.

Calzadilla, A., Rehdanz, K., Betts, R., Falloon, P., Wiltshire, A., & Tol, R. S. J. (2013) Climate change impacts on global agriculture. Climate Change, 120, 357-374.

9.

Chang, C.-C. (2002). The Potential Impact of Climate Change on Taiwan's Agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 27, 51-64.

10.

Darwin, R. (2004). Effects of greenhouse gas emissions on world agriculture, food consumption, and economic welfare. Climate Change, 66, 191-238.

11.

Davis, G. C., & Espinoza, M. C. (1998). A Unified Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Equilibrium Displacement Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 868-879.

12.

Frank, S., Witzke, H.-P., Zimmermann, A., Havlik, P., & Ciaian, P. (2014). Climate change impacts on European agriculture: a multi model perspective. Paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies‘. Ljubljana, Slovenia.

13.

Frank, S., Bottcher, H., Gusti, M., Havlik, P., Klaassen, G, Kindermann, G., & Obersteiner, M. (2016). Dynamics of the land use, land use change, and forestry sink in the European Union: the impacts of energy and climate targets for 2030. Climate Change, 138, 253-266.

14.

Georgopoulou, E., Mirasgedis, S., Sarafidis, Y., Vitaliotou, M., Lalas, D.P. Theloudis, I., Giannoulaki, K.-D., Dimopoulos, D., & Zavras, V. (2017). Climate change impacts and adaptation options for the Greek agriculture in 2021–2050: A monetary assessment. Climate Risk Management, 16, 164–182.

15.

IPCC. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

16.

IPCC. (2014a). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir,M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

17.

IPCC. (2014b). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

18.

Katha, J., Mushtaqa, S., Henry, R., Adeyinkaa, A., Stone, R., Marcussena, T., Kouadioa, L. (2019). Spatial variability in regional scale drought index insurance viability across Australia‘s wheat growing regions. Climate Risk Management, 24, 13–29.

19.

Key, N., & Tallard, G. (2012). Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies. Climate Change, 112, 387-414.

20.

Lybbert, T. J., & Sumner, D. A. (2012). Agricultural technologies for climate change in developing countries: Policy options for innovation and technology diffusion. Food Policy, 37, 114- 123.

21.

Mushtaq, S. (2018). Managing climate risks through transformational adaptation: Economic and policy implications for key production regions in Australia, Climate Risk Management, 19, 48-60.

22.

Meyers, W. H., Westhoff, P., Fabiosa, J.F., & Hayes, D. J. (2010) The FAPRI global modeling sysytem and outlook process. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 1-19.

23.

Nahar, A., Luckstead, J., Wailes, E. J., & Alam, M. J. (2018). An assessment of the potential impact of climate change on rice farmers and markets in Bangladesh. Climate Change, 150, 289-304.

24.

Palatnik, R. R., & Roson, R. (2012). Climate change and agriculture in computable general equilibrium models: alternative modeling strategies and data needs. Climate Change, 112, 1085-1100.

25.

Park, S. Y., & Kim, I. S. (2018). The Economic Impact of Government Purchases on the Price Volatility of Korean Dried Red Pepper. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(10), 73-82.

26.

Pizer, W. A. (2002). Combining price and quality control to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 409-434.

27.

Porter, J.R., L. Xie, A.J. Challinor, K. Cochrane, S.M. Howden, M.M. Iqbal, D.B. Lobell, and M.I. Travasso (2014). Food security and food production systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. (pp. 485-533), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

28.

Sands, R. D., Forster, H., Jones, C. A., & Schumacher, K. (2014). Bio-electricity and land use in the Future Agricultural Resources Model (FARM). Climate Change, 123, 719-730.

29.

Smith P., M. Bustamante, H. Ahammad, H. Clark, H. Dong, E. A. Elsiddig, H. Haberl, R. Harper, J. House, M. Jafari, O. Masera, C. Mbow, N. H. Ravindranath, C. W. Rice, C. Robledo Abad, A. Romanovskaya, F. Sperling, & F. Tubiello (2014). Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R.Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J.Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. (pp. 811-922), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

30.

Watkiss, P., Hunt, A., Blyth, W., & Dyszynski, J. (2015). The Use of New Economic Decision Support Tools for Adaptation Assessment: A Review of Methods and Applications, Towards Guidance on Applicability. Climatic Change, 132(3), 401-416.

31.

Williges, K., Mechler, R., Bowyer, P., & Balkovic., J. (2017). Towards an assessment of adaptive capacity of the European agricultural sector to droughts. Climate Services, 7, 47-63.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business