바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • E-ISSN2233-5382
  • KCI

Evaluation of the Capacity of Rural Communities in Indonesia to Improve the Economic Welfare

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2022, v.13 no.9, pp.1-9
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2022.vol13.no9.1
RIANI, Westi
FADHILAH, Alya Muthia
HARYADI, Sigit

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the ability to improve the economic welfare of rural communities in Indonesia by using the inequality measures of the distribution of information between leaders and their people as a variable that weakens the capacity of increasing the welfare. Research Design, Data, and Methodology: The research designed by developing an instrument using data validity and reliability testing. Before, primary data collected through interviews, questionnaires, observation, and documentation on the selected respondents. Then, the research method used is mixed methods research, in which quantitative and qualitative methods combined. Result: The finding from this study is that there is an inequality measure in the form of a high gap between the score of information distribution obtained by the village government compared to the score of the community, which has led to the welfare of the village which is still at a moderate level and not ready to become a prosperous society. Conclusion: The weakness of the village community is related to two things, namely the behavior and knowledge of the community about the issues, so the implication is that there must be a strong effort from the central government to ensure that technology is more evenly distributed to all villagers.

keywords
Information Distribution, Economic Welfare, Inequality measure, Rural Community

Reference

1.

Alem, D., Caunhye, A.M., & Moreno, A. (2022). Revisiting Gini for equitable humanitarian logistics. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82(B), 1-15.

2.

Basakhaa, M., & Kamal, S.H.M. (2019). Industrial development and social welfare: A case study of Iran. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68(C), 1-14.

3.

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205

4.

Berinsky, A.J. (2002). Silent voices: Social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 276-287.

5.

Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Grishnova, O. (2019). ICT and Economic Growth: Links And Possibilities Of Engaging. Intellectual Economics, 13(1), 1-12.

6.

Bujang, M.A, Omar, E.D, & Baharum, N.A. (2018). A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences¸ 25(6), 85–99.

7.

Choi, H-Y., Kensinger, E.A., & Rajaram, S. (2017). Mnemonic Transmission, Social Contagion, and Emergence of Collective Memory: Influence of Emotional Valence, Group Structure, and Information Distribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 146(9), 1247–1265.

8.

Congleton, A. R., & Rajaram, S. (2014). Collaboration changes both the content and the structure of memory: Building the architecture of shared representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1570 –1584

9.

Dasgupta, P. (1986). Positive Freedom, Markets and The Welfare State. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2(2), 25-36.

10.

Drupp, M.A., Meya, J.N., Baumgärtner, S., & Quaas, M.F. (2018). Economic Inequality and the Value of Nature. Ecological Economics, 1(50), 340-345.

11.

Hennessy, D.A., & Babcock, B.A. (1998). Information, flexibility, and value added. Information Economics and Policy, 10(4), 431-449.

12.

Kang, E. (2022). Innovative Capability and Its Connection with Worker’s Environmental Performance. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 13(7), 17-25

13.

Kozlovskyi, S., Nikolenko, L., Peresada, O., Pokhyliuk, O.,Yatchuk, O., Bolgarova, N., & Kulhanik, O. (2020). Estimation level of public welfare on the basis of methods of intellectual analysis. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(3), 355-372.

14.

Mitchell, W.C. Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory. (1999). The American Economic Review, 15(1), 1-12.

15.

Mullatahiri, V. & Ukaj, F. (2019). The Effects of E-marketing Communications on Brand Loyalty: The Case of Mobile Telephone Operators in Kosovo. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(6), 15-23.

16.

Oktaroza, M.L., Maemunah, M., Hartanto, R., Purnamasari, P.(2022). Work Ethics Strengthen the Impact of Distribution Knowledge Sharing on Innovation Abilities in Small Public Accountant Firms. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(7), 35-46.

17.

Plested, B.A., Jumper-Thurman, P., & Edwards, R.W. (2009). Community Readiness: Advancing “this issue” prevention in Native communities. Community Readiness Model Manual, Revised Edition, Fort Collins, CO: Ethnic Studies, Management Studies, 51(3), 349-378.

18.

Sumarto, M. (2017). Welfare Regime Change in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Policy &Administration, 51(6), 940–959

19.

Sunstein, C.R. (1994). Political Equality and Unintended Consequences. Columbia Law Review, 94(4), 13-90.

20.

Thewissen, S., & Rueda, D. (2019). Automation and the welfare state: Technological change as a determinant of redistribution preferences. Comparative Political Studies, 52(2), 171-208.

21.

Walker, C.C., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2021). Welfare systems without economic growth: A review of the challenges and next steps for the field. Ecological Economics, 186(C ), 1-15.

22.

Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94(A), 1-16.

23.

Wang, H. (2017). Information acquisition versus information manipulation in multi-period procurement markets. Information Economics and Policy, 40(C), 48-59.

24.

White, F.C. (1979). Public welfare and state-local government finance. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 13(4), 205-212.

25.

Woo, H. (2022). The Importance of CEO's Sustainable Leadership to Distribute Environmental Education Culture in the Organization. The Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 13(8), 19-27.

26.

Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., Peng, X., & Hong, J. (2020). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter? European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 371-394

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business