- Apply for Authority
- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
Effects of Individuals, Leader Relationships, and Groups on Innovative Work Behaviors
Cho, Hee-Young
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The intent of this research is to discover the factors that enhance innovative work behaviors of group members in order to strengthen the competitiveness of small enterprises. In addition, we verify that employee job characteristic factors have an influence between antecedent variables and dependent variables in the work situations at small companies. Research design, data, and methodology - This study is focused on identifying the factors, such as self-efficacy, leader member exchange (LMX), and collective efficacy, which promote innovative work behaviors. A total of 305 valid questionnaires were collected. Results - The results of a path analysis showed that LMX did not have significant effects on task significance, and autonomy did not have significant effects on innovative work behavior. Conclusions - These findings of the study imply that even though leaders supported the groups in accordance with official procedures by placing group members within or outside certain groups, task identity perceived by group members was not impacted. In addition, autonomy given to those with relatively less capability might be a burden rather than a positive outcome.
- keywords
- Job Stress, Self-Esteem, Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intention, Turnover Experience
Reference
Argyris, C., and Schöon, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning :Theory Method and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: toward A Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of Human Agency through Collective Efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5), 644-664.
Burton, D. M. (2001). The Company They Keep: Founders’models for Organizing New Firms. In C. B. Schoonhoven, &Romanelli, E. (Eds.), The Entrepreneurship Dynamic:Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (pp.13-39). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Choi, Hae-Soo (2014). The Effect of Job Characteristics to Employee's Self-Efficacy in the Hotel Company: Focused on the Moderation Effect of Contextual Performance. Korean Journal of Tourism Research(KASTM), 29(4), 189-211.
Dansereau, F., Green, G., y Haga, W. (1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement. Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years:Applying a Multi-level Multi-domain Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
Han, Kwang-Hyun (2005). The Moderated Effect of Self-efficacy and Group-efficacy on the Hotel Employee's Burnout Process. Korea Academic Society of Hotel Administration(KJHA), 14(2), 63-87.
Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The Ties that Bind:The Impact of Leader-member Exchange, Transformational and Transactional Leadership, and Distance on Predicting Follower Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680-694.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovation Work Motivation, Burnout and Turnover Intentions: A Study among Nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 1360-1369.
Kuhn, J. S., & Marsick, V. J. (2005). Action Learning for Strategic Innovation in Mature Organizations: Key Cognitive, Design and Contextual Considerations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 27-48.
Lee, Joon-Seop., Lee, Cheol-Gyu., & Yoo, Wang-Jin (2012). The Influence of the Thermal Powerplant Workers' Job Demands on Job Engagement & Job Burnout: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self-efficacy & Collective-efficacy. Journal of Human Resource Management(JHRMR), 19(1), 27-45.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A Longitudinal Study on the Early Development of Leader-member Exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674.
Mesch, D. J., Farh, J. L., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Effects of Feedback Sign on Group Goal Setting, Strategies, and Performance. Group & Organization Management, 19(3), 309–333.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
Park, Woo-Jong., & Park, Kwang-Ho (2011). An Empirical Study on The Influence of SME's Productivity Management System on Productivity Performance: Focusing on Auto Part Suppliers. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 33(2), 23-41.
Pescosolido, A. T. (2003). Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness the Effects of Group Efficacy over Time on Group Performance and Development. Small Group Research, 34(1), 20-42.
Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 187-198.
Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 187-198.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Seo, Young-sun., & Son, Jung-min (2015). A Study of Effect of CEO Innovativeness, Organizational Learning Culture, and the Extent of Use of Information System on Firm's Innovation Performance: Focus on Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms in Gimhae. International Bushiness Journal, 26(1), 173-196.
Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group Goals and Group Performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 307-334.
West, M. A. (1990). The Social Psychology of Innovation in Groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies(pp. 309-333). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-regulatory Mechanism and Complex Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
Yang, Hoe-Chang (2014). Revisiting Self-Enhancement Bias and Transformational Leadership Using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 83-93.
Yang, Hoe-Chang., & Cho, Hee-Young (2015). Small and Medium Business Workers' Positive Psychologucal Capital, Life Satisfaction, and Innovative Work Behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(7), 25-31.
Yang, Hoe-Chang., Jeon, Jun-Ho., & Park, Jong-Rok (2014). Contact Frequency and Psychological Distance between Leaders: Job Distress and Mediation through Employees'Perceived Self-Leadership. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 41-48.
Yang, Hoe-Chang., & Ju, Young-Hwang (2011). Positive Integration of the Franchise System: A New Perspective on Leadership, Followership, Trust and Group Efficacy. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 1(1), 5-8.
Yang, Hoe-Chang., & Lee, Young-Chul (2010). An Empirical Study in Relationship between Franchisor's Leadership Behavior Style and Commitment by Focusing Moderating Effect of Franchisee's Self-efficacy. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 15(1), 49-71.
Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education India.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations