- Apply for Authority
- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
Continuous Audits Using Decision Support Systems
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - This article's aim is to examine how the utilization of existing and future decision-support systems will lead to a change in the auditing process. Research design, data, and methodology - An information system is a special decision-support system that combines information obtained from various sources and communicates among them to help in assessing appropriate complex financial decisions. This paper analyzes techniques such as data and text mining as components of decision-support systems to be used in the auditing process. Results - We present views about how existing decision-support systems will lead to a change in audits. Auditors, who currently collect significant data manually, will in the future move towards management through complex decision-support systems. Conclusions - Although some internal audit functions are integrated into systems of continuous monitoring, the use of such systems remains limited. Thus, instead of multiple decision-support systems, a unified decision-support system can be deployed for this that includes sensors integrated within a company in different contexts (e.g., production, sales, and accounting) that continually monitors violations of controls, unusual patterns, and unusual transactions.
- keywords
- Continuous Auditing, Decision Support Systems, Internal Controls, Text Mining
Reference
Abdolmohammadi, M. (1978). Decision Support and Expert Systems in Auditing: A Review and Research Directions. Accounting and Business Research, 173, 185.
Abdolmohammadi, M., & Usoff. C. (2001). A Longitudinal Study of Applicable Decision Aids for Detailed Tasks in a Financial Audit. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management,10,139-154.
Arnold, V., Collier, P. A., Leech, S. A., and Sutton, S. G. (2004). The Impact of Intelligent Decision Aidson Experienced and Novice Decision Makers' Judgments. Accounting and Finance, 44(1), 1-26
Ashton, R. H. (1990). Pressure and Performance in Accounting Decision Settings: Paradoxical Effects of Incentives, Feedback and Justification. Journal of Accounting Research, 28,148-186.
Baldwin-Morgan, A. A., & Stone, M. F. (1995). A Matrix Model of Expert Systems Impacts. Expert Systems with Applications, 9 (4),599-608.
Bell, T. B., & Carcello, J. V. (2000). A Decision Aid for Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19 (1), 169-182.
ChangChit, C., & Holsapple, C. W. (2004). The Development of Expert System for Managerial Evaluation of Internal Controls, Intelligent Systems in Accounting. Finance and Management, 12(2),103-120.
Dillard, J. F., & Yuthas, K. (2001). A Responsibility Ethic for Audit Expert Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 337-348.
Eining, M. M., Jones, D. R., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1997). Reliance on Decision Aids: An Examination of Auditors' Assessment of Management Fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16 (2), 1-19.
Ghanbarian, R. (2011). Ethical procedures (ethos). Accountant monthly, 234, 61-64.
Hunton, J., and Rose, J. (2010). 21st Century Auditing: Advancing Decision Support System in Achieve Continuous Auditing. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 297–312
Keila P., & Skillicorn, D. (2005). Structure in the Enron Email Dataset. Computational and Mathematical organization theory, 11 ,183-199.
Majdalawieh, M., Sahroui, S., & Barkhi, R. (2012). IIPCA, Integrating Continuous Auditing Within an Enterprise System Environment. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 304-327.
Wang, J., & Yang, J. (2009). Data Mining Technique for Auditing Attest Function and Fraud Detection. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 1(1), 1-24.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations