바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • E-ISSN2233-5382
  • KCI

The Economic Impact of Government Purchases on the Price Volatility of Korean Dried Red Pepper

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2018, v.9 no.10, pp.73-82
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no10.73.
Park, Su-Yeon
Kim, In-Seck

Abstract

Purpose - Unstable vegetable prices have been one of the major concerns in Korean agricultural and food marketing system. The Korean government has implemented a number of policy instruments, including government purchasing programs in order to alleviate fluctuations in vegetable prices. The economic impact of policy instruments has been assessed based on the average monthly price change rate before and after the implementation of the policy. However, this approach failed to provide a net impact of policy measures on price stabilization in the vegetable markets, as policy impacts could not be successfully distinguished from other effects on price changes in the vegetable market. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the net impact of the government purchasing program on the price volatility of dried red pepper which is considered one of the major vegetables in Korea. Research design, data, and methodology - This study develops a monthly dynamic partial equilibrium model of Korean dried red pepper market. Behavioral equations in the model were estimated by OLS and synthetic method based on the annual and monthly time series data from 1993 to 2015. The model is first simulated to yield actual dried red pepper market conditions in 2015 as a baseline and then compared it to the scenario assuming that there were no government purchases of dried red pepper in 2015. Results - According to the ex-post scenario analysis using the developed model, without the government procurements in 2015, the average monthly price change rate and the value of coefficient of variation of dried red pepper in 2015 would be respectably 7.9 percent and 0.10. It is relatively higher than the actual average monthly price change rate and the value of coefficient of variation of dried red pepper in 2015 which were respectively 1.7 percent and 0.06. Conclusions - The ex-post simulation results in this study shows that if there were no government purchases of dried red pepper in 2015, the dried red pepper market would have had much higher volatile price movements. The results of this study would provide useful information for future price stabilization policy of vegetable markets in Korea.

keywords
price volatility, dried red pepper, ex-post analysis, dynamic partial equilibrium model

Reference

1.

Hoang, H. J., & Meyers, W. H. (2015). Price stabilization and impacts of trade liberalization in the Southeast Asi an rice market. Food Policy, 57(November), 26-39.

2.

Hong, H. (2016). Information Cascade and Share Market Volatility: A Chinese Perspective. Journal of Asian Fina nce, Economics and Business, 3(4), 17-24.

3.

Huang, S. W., & Huang, K. S. (2012). Marketing Effects of U.S. Fresh Produce Imports. Journal of Agribusiness, 30(1), 53-67.

4.

Jati, K., & Premaratne, G. (2017). Analysis of Staple Foo d Price Behaviour: Multivariate BEKK-GARCH Model. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(4), 27-37.

5.

Jin, H. J., & Kim, T. H. (2012). Structural Changes in the Time Series of Food Prices and Volatility Measurement. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(4), 929-944.

6.

Karali, B., & Power, G. J. (2013). Short- and Long-run Determinants of Commodity Price Volatility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(3), 724-738.

7.

Key, N., Prager, D. L., & Burns, C. B. (2018). The Income Volatility of U.S. Commercial Farm Households. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(2), 215-239.

8.

Kim, S. S. (2013). A Study on the Impact of Oil Price Vo latility on Korean Macro Economic Activities: An EGAR CH and VECM Approach. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(10), 73-79.

9.

Kim, Y. C., & Yi, M. H. (2016). A Study on the Sudden Stop in Capital Flows and Foreign Exchange and Distri bution Market Stability. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(12), 79-87.

10.

Lama, A., Jha, G. K., Paul, R. K., & Gurung, B. (2015). Modelling and Forecasting of Price Volatility: An Applic ation of GARCH and EGARCH Models. Agricultural Ec onomics Research Review, 28(1), 73-82.

11.

Lee, J. W., & Brahmasrene, T. (2018). An Exploration of Dynamical Relationships between Macroeconomic Varia bles and Stock Prices in Korea. Journal of Asian Finan ce, Economics and Business, 5(3), 7-17.

12.

Lee, J. W., & Zhao, T. F. (2014). Dynamic Relationship b etween Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence fr om Chinese Stock Markets. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 1(1), 5-14.

13.

Mcphail, L. L., & Babcock, B. A. (2012). Impact of US bi ofuel policy on US corn and gasoline price variability. Energy, 37(1), 505-513.

14.

Meyers, W. H., Westhoff, P., Fabiosa, J. F., & Hayes, D. J. (2010). The FAPRI Global Modeling System and Out look Process. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 1-19.

15.

Rahmi, M., Azma, N., Muttaqin, A. A., Jazil, T., & Rahman, M. (2016) Risk Volatility Measurement: Evidence fro m Indonesian Stock Market, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(3), 57-65.

16.

Saghaian, S., Nemati, M., Walters, C., & Chen, B. (2018). Asymmetric Price Volatility Transmission between U. S. Biofuel, Corn, and Oil Markets. Journal of Agricultur al and Resource Economics, 43(1), 46-60.

17.

Sahadudheen, I. (2015). An Exponential GARCH Approac h to the Effect of Impulsiveness of Euro on Indian Sto ck Market. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and B usiness, 2(3), 17-22.

18.

Siddiqui, M. A., & Erum, N. (2016). Modeling Effect of Ex change Rate Volatility on Growth of Trade Volume in P akistan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Busi ness, 3(2), 33-39.

19.

Su, Y., & Cook, M. L. (2015). Price Stability and Economic Substantiality-Achievable Goals? A Case Study of Organic Valley. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(2), 635-651.

20.

Thompson, W., Gerlt, S., Campbell, J. E., Kueppers, L. M., Lu, Y., & Snyder, M. A. (2017). A Cost of Tractabil ity? Estimating Climate Change Impacts Using a Single Crop Market Understates Impacts on Market Conditions and Variability. Applied Economic Perspectives and Poli cy, 39(2), 346-362.

21.

Thompson, W., Johansson, R., Meyer, S., & Whistance, J. (2018). The US biofuel mandate as a substitute for carbon cap-and-trade. Energy Policy, 113(February), 368-375.

22.

Trujillo-Barrera, A., Mallory, M., & Garcia, P. (2012). Volat ility Spillovers in U.S. Crude Oil, Ethanol, and Corn Fut ures Markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Eco nomics, 37(2), 247-262.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business