E-ISSN : 2983-3973
Background; This study analyzed a survey on the evaluation and accreditation process of Korean medicine education at D University of Korean Medicine. The research aimed to examine the validity of the KAS2022 evaluation, gather data for improving Korean medicine education quality, and identify educational strengths and weaknesses. Methods; A survey was conducted among 19 self-evaluation committee members, including professors from basic sciences, clinical sciences, and medical education at D College of Korean Medicine. The survey covered various aspects of the accreditation process, including perceptions, preparation, understanding of standards, opinions on criteria, views on student growth, and satisfaction. Professors from different fields analyzed the results, drawing conclusions through further discussions. Results; Results showed that while professors recognized the necessity of accreditation, they expressed concerns about its implementation challenges, including workload, effectiveness, and lack of support. Difficulties were noted in areas such as curriculum design, student assessment, and resource allocation. Discussion and conclusion; The study concludes that future accreditation processes should focus on simplifying evaluation content, providing appropriate faculty support, and ensuring that accreditation directly contributes to improving educational quality and student competencies.