바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

A case study on the optimal tunnel design based on risk analysis

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2010, v.12 no.5, pp.379-387

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this study, a case study was introduced for the design of a twin tunnel along high speed national highway Route 12 from Damyang to Sungsan. It was related to determine the optimal tunnel support pattern and excavation method based on a risk analysis in order to incorporate the uncertainty of ground properties. To this end, 3 alternatives with different amounts of support and excavation method were selected and risk analysis was performed by applying Monte Carlo simulation technique, respectively. Stability of the tunnel was quantified by the factor of safety. To improve the result, the 729 cases of the combination of ground properties (deformation modulus, cohesion, and internal friction angle) satisfying a Gaussian distribution were generated and applied. Also, stability of the tunnel was confirmed by analyzing the distribution of both displacement and shotcrete bending stress.

keywords
Risk analysis, factor of safety, Monte Carlo simulation, optimal tunnel design, 위험도 분석, 안전율, Monte Carlo simulation, 최적 터널설계, Risk analysis, factor of safety, Monte Carlo simulation, optimal tunnel design

Reference

1.

1. 김영근, 김도형(2008), “터널 안정성 및 환경성을 고려한 위험도 평가기법의 적용”, 한국터널공학회 논문집, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1~15.

2.

2. 김영민(1999), “유한요소법에 의한 사면붕괴 거동해석에 미치는 영향분석”, 한국지반공학회 논문집, 제15권, 제5호, pp. 19~28.

3.

3. 대우조선해양건설(주), 한신공영(주)(2009), 고속국도 제12호선 88올림픽고속도로(담양-성산간) 확장공사 제10공구, 터널해석보고서.

4.

4. 유광호, 박연준(2003), “터널 지보패턴 결정을 위한 위험도 분석”, 한국터널공학회 논문집, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 241~250.

5.

5. 유광호, 박연준, 배규진(2000), “연약암반층에 굴착된 터널의 안전율 평가”, 한국터널협회 논문집, 제2권, 제3호, pp. 47~57.

6.

6. 유광호, 박연준, 강용(2001), “절리암반 터널의 안전율 평가를 위한 수치해석적 연구”, 한국암반공학회 논문집, 제11권, 제3호, pp. 279~288.

7.

7. 유광호, 박연준, 홍근영, 이현구, 김재권(2005), “지보재파괴를 고려한 터널 안전율의 수치해석적 산정 연구”, 한국터널공학회 논문집, 제7권, 제1호, pp. 37~49.

8.

8. 유광호, 임영수, 김종규(2010), “위험도분석을 이용한 터널의 최적 지보패턴 결정 사례”, 2010년 한국터널공학회 정기학술발표회, 한국과학기술회관, pp. 268-275.

9.

9. 유광호, 정지성(2008), “2차원 연속체 해석에 의한 지하 공동 형상비별 안정성 평가 비교”, 한국터널공학회 논문집, 제10권, 제2호, pp. 193~205.

10.

10. Einstein, H.H.(1996), “Risk and Risk Analysis in Rock Engineering”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 141∼155.

11.

11. Giam, S.K. and Donald, I.B.(1988), “Determination of critical slip surfaces for slopes via stress-strain calculations”, Proc. Fifth Australia-New Zealand Conference on Geomech., Sydney, Australia, pp. 461~464.

12.

12. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.(2005), Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Ver. 5.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

13.

13. Matsui, T. and San, K.C.(1992), “Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique”, Soils and Foundation, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 59~70.

14.

14. Naylor, D.J.(1982), “Finite elements and slope stability”, Numer. Meth. in Geomech., Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute. Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 229~244.

15.

15. Ugai, K. and Leshchinsky, D.(1995), “Three-dimensional limit equilibrium and finite element analyses: a comparison of results”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1~7.

16.

16. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Humpheson, C., and Lewis, R.W.(1975), “Associated and non-associated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics”, Geotechnique, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 671~689.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회