바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

Effect of orientation of fracture zone on tunnel behavior - Numerical Investigation

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2013, v.15 no.3, pp.253-270



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper concerns the effect of orientation and geometric characteristics of a fracture zone on the tunnel behavior using a numerical investigation. A parametric study was executed on a number of drill and blast tunnelling cases representing different fracture and tunnelling conditions using two and three dimensional finite element analyses. The variables considered include the strike and dip angle of fracture zone relative to the longitudinal tunnel axis, the width and the clearance of the fracture zone, the tunnel depth, and the initial lateral stress coefficient. The results of the analyses were examined in terms of the tunnel deformation including crown settlement, convergence, and invert heave as well as shotcrete lining stresses. The results indicate that the tunnel deformation as well as the shotcrete lining stress are strongly influenced by the orientation of the fracture zone, and that such a trend becomes more pronounced for tunnels with greater depths

keywords
Drill and blast tunnel, Finite element analysis, Deep tunnel, Fracture zone, 발파 굴착 터널, 유한요소해석, 대심도 터널, 파쇄대

Reference

1.

1. Kim, C.Y., Kim, K.Y., Baek, S.H., Moon, H.K., Lee, S.D. (2006), “Numerical analysis on the effect of fractured zone on the displacement - behavior of tunnel”, Tunnel & Underground Space, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 218-231.

2.

2. Kim, C.Y., Hong, S.W., Kim, K.Y., Baek, S.H. (2004), “Numerical analysis of the convergence behavior of the tunnel”, Tunnel & Underground Space, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 183-197.

3.

3. Shin, H.S., Lee, S.H., Bae, G.J. (2007), “Survey of tunnel collapses”, No.33 Regular Conference of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 2979-2982.

4.

4. Korea Institute of Construction Technology. (2009), Development of Technologies Minimizing and Preventing the Disaster on Tunnel Construction [VI].

5.

5. Tunnel & Underground Space. (2010), Case Histories of Tunnel Collapse.

6.

6. Abaqus users manual, Version 6.12. (2011), Hibitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, Providence, R.I.

7.

7. Davis, E.H. (1968), Theories of plasticity and the failure of soil masses. Soil mechanics: Selected topics, Butterworth’s London, U.K., pp. 341-380.

8.

8. HSE. (1996), “Safety of new austrian tunnelling method (NATM) tunnels”. Health & Safety Executive, London, pp. 86.

9.

9. ITA Working Group No.17 Reprot (2010), Long Tunnels at Great Depth, pp. 31.

10.

10. Kun, M., Onargan, T. (2013), “Influence of the fault zone in shallow tunneling: A case study of izmir metro tunnel”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 34-45.

11.

11. Matos, A.C., Sousa, L.R., Kleberger, J., Pinto, P.L. (2004), “Geotechnical risk in rock tunnels”, Taylor and Francis, pp. 191.

12.

12. Yoo, C., Lee, Y.L, Kim, S.H., Kim, H.T. (2010), “Tunnelling-induced ground settlements in a groundwater drawdown environment - A case study”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 69-77.

13.

13. Yoo, C. (2013), “Interaction between tunneling and bridge foundation - A 3D numeical interaction”, Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 70-78.

14.

14. Vlasov, S.N., Makovsky, L.V., Merkin, V.E. (2001), “Accident in transportation and subway tunnels”, Construction to operation, Russian Tunnelling Association, Moscow, pp. 198.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회