바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

ISSN : 2233-8292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.15 No.3
Citation Share

Model for predicting ground surface settlement by field measuring and numerical analysis in shield TBM tunnel

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2013, v.15 no.3, pp.271-287




& (2013). Model for predicting ground surface settlement by field measuring and numerical analysis in shield TBM tunnel. (사)한국터널지하공간학회, 15(3), 271-287.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

In this study, more convenient model(S-model) for predicting ground surface settlement is developed through comparing field monitoring data of the domestic subway applied shield TBM method with conventional equation & numerical analysis. Sample stations are chosen from whole of excavation section and lateral & vertical ground surface settlement characteristic with excavation are analysed. Based on analysis result, through the comparison with actual monitoring data, the model that is possible to compute maximum surface settlement and settlement influence area is suggested with assumption that lateral surface settlement forms are composed relaxed zone and elastic zone. In addition, vertical ground surface settlement patterns with excavation are similar to cubic-function and S-model with assumption that coefficients are function of tunnel diameter and depth is suggested. Consequently, the ground surface settlement patterns are significantly similar to actual monitoring data and numerical method result. Thus, as a result, when tunnels are excavated using sheild TBM through rather soft weathered soil & rock layer, prediction of ground surface settlement with excavation using convenient S-model is practicable.

keywords
Shield TBM, Surface settlement, Gap parameter, FEM analysis, Segment, S-model, 쉴드 TBM, 지표침하량, 갭 파라미터, 유한요소해석, 세그먼트, S-모델

Reference

1.

1. Attewell, P.B., Farmer, I.W. (1974), “Ground deformations resulting from shield tunnelling in London Clay” Canadian Geotech, J. Vol. 11, pp. 380-395.

2.

2. Attewell, P.B. (1978), “Ground movements caused by tunnelling in soil” Proc. Int. Conf. on Large movements and Structures, Pentech Press, London, pp. 812-948.

3.

3. Attewell, P.B., Woodman, J.P. (1982), “Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil”, Ground Engineering Vol. 15, pp. 13-22.

4.

4. Attewell, P.B., Yeates J., Selby, A.R. (1986), “Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures”, Blackie, London.

5.

5. Boscardin, M.D., Cording, E.J. (1989), “Building response to excavation induced settlement”, J. Geotech. Engng ASCE, Vol. 115, pp. 1-21.

6.

6. Bowers, K.H., Hiller, D.M., New, B.M. (1996), “Ground movement over three years at the Heathrow Expresss Trial Tunnel”, Mair and Tayler (eds.) 1996, pp. 647-652.

7.

7. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Lee, G.P., Bae, G.J. (2011), “Rock TBM design model derived from the multi-variate regression analysis of TBM driving date”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 531-555.

8.

8. Davis, E.H., Gunn, M.J., Mair, R.J., Seneviratne, H.N. (1980), “Stability of shallow tunnels and underground openings in cohesive materials”, Geotechnique, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 397-416.

9.

9. Glossop, N.H., Farmer, I.W. (1979), “Settlement Associated with Removal of Compressed Air Pressure during Tunnelling in Alluvial Clay” Geotechnique, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 67-72.

10.

10. Kim, M.M., Kim, S.Y., Lee, J.H. (2004), “Verification for the VisualFEA”, Korean Geotechnical Society.

11.

11. Kim, S.H., Kim, J.D., Park, I.J. (2011), “An experimental study on screw conveyor system of EPB shield TBM”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 519-530.

12.

12. Lee, K.M., Rowe, R.K., Lo. K.Y. (1992), “Subsidence owing to tunnelling, I. Estimating the gap parameter”, Canada, Geotech. J., Vol. 29, pp. 929-941.

13.

13. Lee, J,Y., Ahn S.Y. (2011), “Interactive visualization of elasto-plastic behavior though stress paths and yield surfaces in finite element analysis”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design Vol. 47, pp. 496-510.

14.

14. Mair, R.J., Tayler, R.N., Bracegirdle, A. (1993) “Subsurface settlement prifile above tunnels in clays”, Geotechnique, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 312-320.

15.

15. Mair, R.J., Tayler, R.N. (1996), “Proc. int. symp. on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground”, Balkema, Rotterdam.

16.

16. Muir Wood, A.M. (1970), “Soft ground tunnelling”, Technol Pot. Tunnelling (Johannesburg), pp. 167-174.

17.

17. Rowe, R.K., Lee, K.M. (1992), “Subsidence owing to tunnelling, II. Evaluation of a prediction technique”, Canada, Geotech. J., Vol. 29, pp. 941-954.

18.

18. O’Reilly, M.P., New, B.M. (1982), “Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom - their magnitude and prediction”, 82 Symposium. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, pp. 173-181.

19.

19. Peck, R.B. (1969), “Deep excavations and tunnels in soft ground”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, State of the Art Volume pp. 225-290.

20.

20. Roh, B.K., Kon, S.Y., Choo, S.Y. (2012), “Infiltration behavior of the slury into tunnel face during slury shield tunnelling in sandy soil” Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 261-275.

21.

21. Simic, D., Gittoes, G. (1996), “Ground behavior and potential damage to buildings caused by the construction of a large diameter tunnel for the Lisbor Metro”, in Mair and Tayler (eds) 1996. 745-750.

22.

22. Suwanswat, S. (2007) “Longitudinal surface settlements induced by EPB tunnelling in Bangkok Clay” Underground Space the 4th Dimension of Metropolices, Vol. 2, pp. 921-926.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

e-Submission OA Policy