바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

ISSN : 2233-8292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.1
Citation Share

Decision technique for accommodation facilities of multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2019, v.21 no.1, pp.79-92
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.079





& (2019). Decision technique for accommodation facilities of multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase. (사)한국터널지하공간학회, 21(1), 79-92, https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.079
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a method to determine whether to install the accommodation facility of the multi-utility tunnel more effectively in the basic planning phase, and to set up an evaluation system to determine the configuration and kind of accommodation facility. For the configuration of the accommodation facility, 98 alternatives were analyzed for 7 accommodation facility. For the evaluation system of the accommodation facility, index related to feasibility and economic in basic planning phase were selected. The evaluation system classified as spatial, effective, and cost evaluation was presented reflecting the selected index, and AHP analysis was performed for weight setting. The results of this study will be helpful for users including designers to shorten the time and increase the efficiency in the process of determining accommodation facility of the multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase

keywords
Multi-utility tunnel, Accommodation facility, Feasibility assessment, Economic evaluation, Evaluation system, 공동구, 수용시설물, 타당성 평가, 경제성 평가, 평가체계

Reference

1.

1. Cho, C.Y., Sim, Y.J., Kim, H.K., Lee, P.Y., Lee, M.J. (2018), “Analysis of importance by category for quantitative economic evaluation of multi-utility tunnel”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 119-130.

2.

2. Chung, J.S., Na, G.T. (2018), “A study on the feasibility assessment model of urban utility tunnel by analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 131-144.

3.

3. Kang, Y.K., Choi, I.C. (2015), “Economic feasibility of common utility tunnel based on cost-benefit analysis”, Journal of Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 29-36.

4.

4. Lee, S.W., Sim, Y.J., Na, G.T. (2017), “A fundamental study on the development of feasibility assessment system for utility tunnel by urban patterns”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 11-27.

5.

5. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2014), A report of the feasibility and basic planning establishment for urban utility tunnel in Seoul, Seoul Metropolitan Government, pp. 1-10.

6.

6. Sim, Y.J., Jin, K.N., Oh, W.J., Cho, C.Y. (2017), “Development of evaluation model for optimum design of multi-utility tunnel in urban area”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 437-447.

7.

7. Sim, Y.J., Jin, K.N., Oh, W.J., Cho, C.Y. (2018), “Optimal alternative decision technique of accommodation facility in multi-utility tunnel using VE/LCC analysis”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 317-329.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

e-Submission OA Policy