바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

DEM numerical study for the effect of scraper direction on shield TBM excavation in soil

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2019, v.21 no.5, pp.689-698
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.5.689





  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In tunnel excavation by TBMs, a cutterhead, which practically excavates the ground, is an important part directly affecting net penetration rate. Most of the researches on the cutterhead design that have been carried out until now are on the cutter arrangement. It is difficult to find a study for the effect of the scraper installation direction on TBM excavation although same cutterheads except for direction of the scraper are used in Korea. Therefore, this paper shows how the direction of scraper installation affects shield-TBM excavation. Discrete element method was used to identify the effect of scraper installation direction on shield-TBM excavation. When the scraper installation direction was outward, the amount of particles per unit time flowed into the cutter head opening was smaller than when the scraper installation direction was inward, and more loads were applied to the cutterhead.

keywords
TBM, Cutterhead, Scraper, Soil, Excavation, 커터헤드, 스크래퍼, 토사, 굴착

Reference

1.

1. Amoun, S., Sharifzadeh, M., Shahriar, K., Rostami, J., Azali, S.T. (2017), “Evaluation of tool wear in EPB tunneling of Tehran Metro, Line 7 Expansion”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 233-246.

2.

2. Asaf, Z., Rubinstein, D., Shmulevich, I. (2007), “Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage”, Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 92, No. 1-2, pp. 227-242.

3.

3. Das, B.M. (1997). Advanced soil mechanics, Taylor & Francis.

4.

4. Hertz, H. (1882), “Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper”, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Vol. 92, pp. 156-171.

5.

5. Jakobsen, P.D., Lohne, J. (2013), “Challenges of methods and approaches for estimating soil abrasivity in soft ground TBM tunneling”, Wear, Vol. 308, No. 1-2, pp. 166-173.

6.

6. Köppl, F., Thuro, K., Thewes, M. (2015), “Suggestion of an empirical prognosis model for cutting tool wear of Hydroshield TBM”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 49, pp. 287-294.

7.

7. Lee, C., Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Park, B., Kang, T.H., Sim, J.K. (2017), “Numerical study of face plate-type EPB shield TBM by discrete element method”, Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 163-176.

8.

8. Li, X., Yuan, D., Huang, Q. (2017), “Cutterhead and cutting tools configurations in coarse grain soils”, The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 182-199.

9.

9. Mindlin, R.D., Deresiewicz, H. (1953), “Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 20, pp. 327-344.

10.

10. Oh, R.O., Park, S.K., Sung, S.K., Lee, J.Y., Kim, H.H. (2018), “Flexural performance evaluation of fiber reinforced segments with GFRP plate”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 839-854.

11.

11. Ucgul, M., Fielke, J.M., Saunders, C. (2014), “Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of tillage:Determination of a suitable contact model and parameters for a cohesionless soil”, Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 121, pp. 105-117.

12.

12. Wang, L., Kang, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, Q. (2015), “Disc cutter wear prediction for a hard rock TBM cutterhead based on energy analysis”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 50, pp. 324-333.

13.

13. Woo, S.J., Yoo, C.S. (2015), “A study on the member forces of segmental linings considering key segments”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 363-382.

14.

14. Yoo, C.S., Jeon, H.M. (2012), “A comparative study on methods for shield tunnel segment lining sectional forces”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 159-181.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회