바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Role of Attitude Importance in Cultural Variations of Cognitive Dissonance

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2013, v.19 no.1, pp.69-86




Abstract

The recent findings proposed and found that people from Eastern cultures could experience strong cognitive dissonance only when certain conditions, such as other-related choices, normative attitudes, were fulfilled. Even though such interesting findings are intuitively convincing on the basis of common understanding of individualist and collectivist cultures, the psychological mechanisms underlying the cultural variations of cognitive dissonance remain untested. The present study examined the role of attitude importance in cognitive dissonance by using the free-choice paradigm. After completing a pretest of individualism-collectivism scales, 60 college students ranked their preference to 10 items of either beverage or traffic regulations twice. Between the two ranking tasks, they were asked to engage in behavioral selection among their 5th and 6th preferred items. They also rated the personal importance of the preference. The results showed that attitude importance was positively correlated with attitude change and it could play a major role in experiencing cognitive dissonance beyond cultural orientation and situational factors. The current findings were discussed in universality of cognitive dissonance across cultures.

keywords
cognitive dissonance, cultural perspectives (individualism-collectivism), attitude importance, 인지부조화, 문화적 가치성향(개인주의-집단주의), 태도 중요도

Reference

1.

김기범 (1996). 대인관계 속에서의 도덕성과 내집단-외집단 구별: 문화 비교 분석 연구. 중앙대학교 석사학위 논문.

2.

류승아 (2010). 자아존중감과 문화적 성향과의 관계연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 169-183.

3.

이종한 (2000). 한국인의 대인관계의 심리사회적 특성: 집단주의적 성향과 개인주의적 성향으로의 변화. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 6(3), 특집호, 201-219.

4.

최상진, 김기범 (1999). 한국인의 Self의 특성: 서구의 self 개념과 대비를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 275-292.

5.

허태균 (2005). 무법으로 태어나 준법을 거쳐 위법으로 성장하는 이유? 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11(특집호), 117-131.

6.

Abelson, R. P. (1988). Conviction. American Psychologist, 43, 267-275.

7.

Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

8.

Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 23-31.

9.

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp.1-62). New York: Academic Press.

10.

Bond, M. H., & Whang, K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

11.

Blanton, H., Pelham, B. W., Dehart, T., & Carvallo, M. (2001). Overconfidence as dissonance reduction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 373-385.

12.

Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 61-80.

13.

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in the desirability of choice alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.

14.

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural difference in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 949-960.

15.

Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. G. (1972). Personal responsibility for consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 558-593.

16.

Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Los Angeles: Sage.

17.

Cooper, J., & Brehm, J. W. (1971). Prechoice awareness of relative deprivation as a determinant of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 571-581.

18.

Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp.229-266). New York: Academic Press.

19.

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109.

20.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

21.

Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.

22.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

23.

Goethals, G. R., & Cooper, J. (1972) The role of intention and postbehavioral consequences in the arousal of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 293-301.

24.

Harris, V. A., & Tamler, H. (1971). Reinstatement of initial attitude and forced-compliance attitude change. The Journal of Social Psychology, 84, 127-134.

25.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 389-400.

26.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.

27.

Hill, D. M. (2005). Race and cognitive dissonance: The role of double-consciousness in the experience of dissonance. Unpublished Masters’ thesis. Princeton University.

28.

Hiniker, P. J. (1969). Chinese reactions to forced compliance: Dissonance reduction or national character. Journal of Social Psychology, 77, 157-176.

29.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

30.

Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., & Boninger, D. S. (2005). Attitude importance and the Accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 749-769.

31.

Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spenser, S. J., Zanna., M. P., & Kitayama, S. (2005). On cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of Easterners and Westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294-310.

32.

Hur, T., Roese, N. J., & Namkoong, J. E. (2009). Regrets in the East and West: Role of intrapersonal versus interpersonal norms. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 151-156.

33.

Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.

34.

Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.

35.

Key, V. O. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.

36.

Kitayama, S., Snibble, A. C., Markus, H. R., & Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any “free” choice?: Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychological Science, 15, 527-533.

37.

Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 240-255.

38.

Krosnick, J. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 297-308.

39.

Modigliani, A., & Gamson, W. A. (1979). Thinking about politics. Political Behavior, 1, 5-30.

40.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Haugtwedt, C. (1991). Ego-involvement and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherifs' contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), Social judgment and intergroup relations: A Festschrift for Muzifer Sherif (pp.147-174). New York: Springer-Verlag.

41.

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.

42.

Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 247-260.

43.

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240- 275.

44.

Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.

45.

Spencer, S. J., Joseps, R. A., & Steele, C. M. (1993). Low self-esteem: The uphill struggle for self-integrity. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 21-36). New York: Plenum Press.

46.

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.

47.

Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.

48.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520.

49.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, Col: Westview Press.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues