.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
- Log In/Sign Up
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2671-8197
- E-ISSN2733-936X
- KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
North Korean Historical Narrative and Recognition on the Second Manchu Invasion of 1636 in 1970~1980
Korean Studies Quarterly / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2022, v.45 no.2, pp.53-87
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.2.202206.53
Jang,
J.
(2022). North Korean Historical Narrative and Recognition on the Second Manchu Invasion of 1636 in 1970~1980. Korean Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 53-87, https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.2.202206.53
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
This study aims to examine the historical narratives of the Second Manchu Invasion of Korea based on historical viewpoint of self‒reliance in the history books published during the 1970~1980’s in North Korea. From 1950s to mid‒1960s, the North Korean government/scholarship narrated the foreign relations of the Joseon dynasty based on the history of resistance against foreign power, where it showed a similar tendency to the South Korean historiography at the time. However, after adopting the Juche, or the Self‒Reliance, ideology as the historical view, the narrative in history of foreign relations illuminated the ‘history of struggle against the foreign invasion’, creating the dichotomous structure, where good people resisted against the evil invaders. The same situation is found in the historical narratives of foreign relations on the Joseon dynasty, and this trend became particularly apparent in the studies on First and Second Manchu invasions alike. In North Korean history publications in 1970~80s, the resistance of the people against the Manchu invaders was emphasized and the activities of the righteous armies raised by commoners in the region of current North Korean territory was magnified. Further more the resistance of the people was dissociated from the diplomatic policy of the feudal government and semanticized as a positive accomplishment, distorting the historical fact that they were defeated by the Manchu invaders. This narrative of history narrowed the width of interpretations on the history of foreign relations, thus creating an environment difficult for providing constructive discussions.
- keywords
- Second Manchu Invasion of Korea, Historical Viewpoint of Self‒reliance, The Synoptic History of Korea, The Whole History of Korea, Historical Narratives, History of Foreign Resistance, 병자호란, 주체사관, 조선통사, 조선전사, 역사서술, 대외항쟁사
Reference
1
국방부 정훈부 편, 『대외항쟁사』. 서울: 국방부 정훈부, 1954.
2
국사편찬위원회 편, 『북한의 역사학(1)』. 과천: 국사편찬위원회, 2002.
3
국사편찬위원회 편, 『한국사』 29. 과천: 국사편찬위원회, 2003.
4
국사편찬위원회 편, 『북한의 한국사 연구동향(4)』. 과천: 국사편찬위원회, 2004.
5
金鍾權, 『國難史槪觀』. 서울: 明文堂, 1957.
6
稻葉岩吉, 『光海君時代の滿鮮關係』. 京城: 大阪屋號書店, 1933.
7
림학선 외, 『조선력사(고등중학교 제4학년용)』. 평양: 교육도서출판사, 1982.
8
박시형, 『조선중세사(하)』. 평양: 국립출판사, 1956
9
박영해･문병우･김재홍, 『평양의 반침략투쟁사(리조편)』. 평양: 사회과학출판사, 2010.
10
사회과학원 력사연구소 편, 『조선통사(상)』. 평양: 과학･백과사전출판사, 1977.
11
사회과학원 력사연구소 편, 『조선전사』 10. 평양: 과학･백과사전출판사, 1980.
12
양형섭, 『1592~1598년 임진조국전쟁에서의 인민의병투쟁』. 평양: 사회과학원력사연구소, 1957.
13
李仁榮, 『韓國滿洲關係史의 硏究』. 서울: 乙酉文化社, 1954.
14
정두희, 『하나의 역사, 두 개의 역사학: 개설서로 본 남북한의 역사학』. 서울: 소나무, 2001.
15
조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 과학원 력사 연구소, 『조선통사(상)』. 평양: 조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 과학원 력사 연구소, 1956.
16
조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 과학원 력사 연구소, 『조선통사(상)』. 평양: 조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 과학원 력사 연구소, 1962.
17
조원래, 『새로운 관점의 임진왜란사 연구』. 서울: 아세아문화사, 2005.
18
총련중앙상임위원회 교과서편찬위원회 편, 『조선력사(고급1)』. 평양: 학우서방, 1972.
19
한국역사연구회 북한사학사연구반, 『북한의 역사 만들기』. 서울: 푸른역사, 2003.
20
계승범, ｢정묘호란의 동인 재고｣. 『洌上古典硏究』 71호, 2020, 247~279쪽.
21
박찬흥, ｢북한 <조선력사>(상)(1963) 교과서의 대외관계사 서술 검토｣. 『白山學報』 119호, 2021, 171~194쪽.
22
이준성, ｢1950~60년대 <조선통사(상)> 간행과 북･소 역사학계 갈등｣. 『사학연구』 137호, 2020, 7~48쪽.
23
장정수, ｢병자호란시 조선 勤王軍의 남한산성 집결 시도와 활동｣. 『韓國史硏究』 173호, 2016, 161~211쪽.
24
鄭杜熙, ｢북한의 역사서술에 나타난 조선왕조의 유산｣. 『東亞硏究』 34호, 1997, 159~177쪽.
Other articles from this issue
- A Study on Kim Il-Sung’s Kyosi and Kim Jong-Il’s Malsseum in the Parts from Foreword to Balhae and Silla of 『Chosun History』(High School Textbook of North Korea)
- North Korean Historical Narrative and Recognition on the Second Manchu Invasion of 1636 in 1970~1980
- From Science to Literature: Changes in the Education on the History of Anti‒Japanese Armed Struggle in North Korea in the 1950s and Early 1960s
- An Essay on a Humanities Data Processing
- Japanese Intellectual Seifuku Tuneya’s Colonization Discourse at the end of the 19th Century
- A Study on the Making of Russian Colonization Policy for the Korean People from 1863 to 1866
- Study on the Shinshukyo’s Missionary Form in Korea During the Period of Residency General
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.