바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.49 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Bibliographic Characteristics of Most-cited Articles - Focusing on the Domestic Social Science Field -

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2018, v.49 no.4, pp.53-71
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.4.201812.53

(2018). A Study on the Bibliographic Characteristics of Most-cited Articles - Focusing on the Domestic Social Science Field -. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 53-71, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.4.201812.53
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify bibliographic characteristics of the top level articles among KCI indexed academic articles. Unlike the existing analysis on citation and most-cited articles, this study analyzed their bibliographic characteristics. The 3,453 articles were collected from 17 social science fields in KCI. The characteristics of authors, institutions, publications, journals, and citations were analyzed. According to the result of the analysis, there was a difference in the ratio of single authors to co-authors and in the number of co-authors. The authors were mostly single authors or two co-authors. In general, the percentage of authors of one article was high. Second, the types of institutions were mostly universities, and there were differences in the number of institutions with authors in each field. And the frequency of the authors' affiliation appeared uneven. There were a number of excellent research institutes and authors depending on the field. Third, the average of years to take to become the top articles for publication was 11 years in 2018. Fourth, most of the published journals were KCI registered journals, and the influence of the journals was not a factor. Fifth, there were differences in the number of cited counts between fields. This study is meaningful to grasp the influencing factors on the bibliographic characteristics of the most-cited articles for the social science field.

keywords
피인용수, 서지분석, 최상위 피인용 논문, KCI, Cited count, Bibliographic analysis, Most-cited articles, KCI

Reference

1.

고영만, 송민선, 김비연, 민혜령. 2013. 인문학및사회과학분야국내학술논문의저자키워드출현빈도와 피인용횟수의 상관관계 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 30(2): 227-243.

2.

김갑선. 2002. 참고문헌의동시공존현상-한국사회과학자들의인용동기와참고문헌의분석. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 36(4): 21-47.

3.

신은자. 2013. 한국 재료공학 논문의 피인용 영향요인에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 30(1):131-150.

4.

이수상. 1999. 지식사회학의 연구방법으로서 인용분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지 , 30(2):157-158.

5.

이재윤, 최상희. 2015. 논문 인용 영향력 측정 지수의 편향성에 대한 연구. 정보관리학회지 ,32(4): 205-221.

6.

조은성, 송재도. 2013. 어떤 국내 논문이 더 많이 인용되는가? 마케팅연구 , 28(4): 33-56.

7.

최용진 등. 2017. 우리나라 SCI급 논문의 저자유형별 피인용 격차 분석. 한국혁신학회지 , 12(3): 39-65.

8.

www.leidenranking.com [인용 2018. 9. 10].

9.

www.kci.go,kr [인용 2018. 10. 1].

10.

나동욱. 2018. UNIST 로드니 루오프 특훈교수, 노벨상 수상 예측 명단에 올라. 베리타스알파 , 9월 20일.

11.

최예나. 2017. 논문피인용수높은순서매겼더니…젊은연구자성과빛났다. 동아일보 . 6월29일.

12.

허정원. 2018. “한국과학자 13명 노벨상 근접” 논문 피인용수 따져보니. 중앙일보 , 9월 28일.

13.

Azer, Samy A. MD, PhD, MEd, MPH. 2015. “The Top-Cited Articles in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Academic Medicine, 90(8): 1147–1161.

14.

J. B. Arbaugh & Alvin Hwang. 2015. “What Are the 100 Most Cited Articles in Business and Management Education Research, and What Do They Tell Us?.” Organization Management Journal, 12(3): 154-175.

15.

Khosa M, Waqas A, Javaid M, et al. 2018. Bibliometrics of the 100 most-cited articles on refugee populations [version 1; referees: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research. 2018, 7:878 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15106.1) [cited 2018. 10. 20].

16.

Uthman OA, et al. 2013. Citation Classics in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Who Wrote the Top 100 Most Cited Articles? PLoS ONE. 8(10): e78517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078517 [cited 2018. 10. 20].

17.

Vincenzo Montinaro, et al. 2018 Citation classics: ranking of the top 100 most cited articles in nephrology, Clinical Kidney Journal, sfy033. <https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy033> [cited 2018. 10. 20].

18.

Walsh C, et al. 2018. The 100 Most Cited Articles on Healthcare Simulation. Simul Healthc, 13(3): 211-220.

19.

Yu-Jin Oh, et al. 2016. A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 247-268.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy