Introduction
Due to rapid industrialization and urbanization through the nineteenth to twenty-first centuries, global environment has changed significantly, leading to habitat fragmentations, nitrogen depositions, and climate changes (Butchart et al., 2010; Ceballos et al., 2017; Maxwell et al., 2016; Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys, 2019). Human activities can also negatively affect threatened or ecologically important species in various environments. Threatened species worldwide are gradually disappearing because they are highly vulnerable to rapid changes in the ecosystem. Threatened species in the Red List of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) are important members for biodiversity. Vié et al. (2009) reported that of 44,837 species assessed in 2008, at least 17,038 (38%) were clas- sified as threatened and 804 (1.8%) species were classified as extinct. Recently, over 130,000 species are on the Red List and almost 40,000 species have been classified as threatened (IUCN, 2021). In the Korea Red Data Book, 6.6% of threatened species were classified based on evaluation of the risk of extinction for targeted 8,037 species (National Biodiversity Center, 2020). Salomão et al. (2009) have demonstrated that the abundance of coprophagous species and species diversity indices of ball-rolling dung beetles are negatively affected by urbanization.
In the present study, we focused on Gymnopleurus mopsus Pallas, an endangered dung beetle widely distributed in grasslands and deserts throughout Eurasia (Kang et al., 2018). This species has gradually disappeared in many countries. In particular, there is a sharp decline in G. mopsus populations in the Iberian Peninsula (including Portugal and Spain) and Western European countries such as Italy and France (Carpaneto et al., 2007; Lobo, 2001; Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys, 2019). In South Korea, it was one of the most dominant dung beetles before 1970 (Paik, 1976). After the last report of G. mopsus in 1971, it has not been reported in South Korea. The Ministry of Enviro- nment (2013) reported that populations of G. mopsus had declined rapidly owing to habitat destruction, a decrease in grazing livestock, and the abuse of chemicals such as pesticides. In addition, it is an important detritivore for livestock dung in pasture environments. Knowledge on the influence of abiotic factors such as hibernation, which is directly involved in the life cycle of G. mopsus, is an important part of the restoration process. Hibernation period is one of crucial factors for the reproduction and survival of G. mopsus. Thus, we focused on effects of hibernation periods on life-history traits of G. mopsus in the present study to determine whether the survival, fecundity, and offspring of G. mopsus could be affected by hibernation periods by comparing the survival, fecundity, larval developmental time, and body sizes of F1 adults under different hibernation periods.
Materials and Methods
Collection and introduction of dung beetles
In this study, we investigated a Mongolian species mainly because of its genetic homogeneity (Yoon et al., 2017). We collected a total of 200 G. mopsus adults from two grazing lands, Saikhandulaan (44°58’18.8"N, 110°05’53.5"E) and Khankhongor (43°39’37.91"N, 104°35’40.58"E) in Mongolia between July 2019 and August 2019. Dung beetles were collected by hand or forceps and placed into a plastic jar to prevent escape. These collected beetles were brought to the laboratory. Small invertebrates (e.g., acari species) attached to each dung beetle’s body were removed using a brush. When importing G. mopsus colonies into South Korea, dung beetles should be inspected under strict quarantine processes in accordance with quarantine laws and procedures so that exotic pests are not included in the body of a dung beetle.
Dung beetle culture
A starter population of G. mopsus has been cultured at the National Institute of Ecology (Yeongyang, South Korea) since July 2019. Dung beetles were maintained in ventilated 60 L plast ic boxes with 40 L of artificial soil. Artificial soil was prepared by mixing river sand and vermiculite (Verminuri, Green Fire Chemicals, Hongseong, South Korea) at a 1:1 ratio. Fresh horse dung (300 g) was provided every 2 d as food. These food items were collected from a horse farm located on Jeju Island. We also checked dung food resource for the presence of pesticides and antibiotics. Distilled water was sprayed onto the artificial soil to maintain moisture content. Food items were stored at -24°C in a freezer for more than 8 d before use to minimize dung-borne pests. Eight dung beetles were reared in each plastic box. The culture was maintained under laboratory conditions at temperature of 25 ± 1°C [16:8 (L:D)] with a relative humidity of 45 ± 10%.
Hibernation
In September 2019, before the beginning of hibernation, dung beetles were sequentially exposed to low temperatures of 22 ± 1 °C [14:10 (L:D)], 20 ± 1 °C [12:12 (L:D)] and 18 ± 1 °C [10:14 (L:D)] for 14 d to adapt to low temperature conditions. After the adaptation process, dung beetles grown in plastic boxes were transferred to an incubator (MLR-352H, Panasonic, Japan) maintained at 5 ± 1 °C [0:24 (L:D)] with a relative humidity of 60 ± 10%. We began our experimental hibernation trials with a dung be etle colony of 32 dung beetles (sex ratio, 1:1) divided into four equal groups according to hibernation periods (30, 60, 90, and 120 d). After the hibernation course, dung beetles were re-transferred from the incubator to the laboratory. They were then sequentially exposed to high temperatures of 18 ± 1 °C [10:14 (L:D)], 20 ± 1 °C [12:12 (L:D)], and 22 ± 1 °C [14:10 (L:D)] for 14 d each in reverse order of the initial temperature exposure.
Survival and fecundity under different hibernation periods
This trial was conducted to investigate life history traits of G. mopsus under different hibernation periods with a focus on adult survival and fecundity. Fresh horse dung (150 g) was placed in a customized transparent plastic culture vessel (17.0 cm in diameter, 40 cm in height) covered with a ventilated nylon mesh (Fig. 1). Culture vessels were filled with artificial soil (2.5 L) that provided a habitat for dung beetles. Water was supplied adlibitum to an artificial soil to maintain soil moisture content. One pair of dung beetles raised on horse dung were placed in each culture vessel. To obtain eggs, we collected dung balls made by G. mopsus and buried them in the ground at one day after confirming the behavior of dung beetles making dung balls (Fig. 1). Data collection was terminated when dung beetles reached the adult stage.
Dung beetle life history traits: Larval development and morphological characters
This trial was conducted to investigate basic life history traits of G. mopsus feeding on horse dung with a focus on larval development and adult growth (body size). Frozen horse dungs were thawed at 25 °C for 8 h before use. Thawed horse dung was divided into 10 g and placed in a customized transparent plastic bottle (2.8 cm in diameter, 3.5 cm in height). One egg laid on a dung ball was placed in a plastic bottle filled with horse dung using a small spoon. When transferring an egg, a portion of the dung ball surrounding the egg was also transferred together. This is because the maternal gift made by adult females is
known to be an important factor for larval growth (Shukla et al., 2016). Daily monitoring was performed. The upper part of the dung chamber was artificially opened so that the inside of the plastic-dung bottle was visible for the observation of larval growth. In addition, we artificially re-opened the upper part of the dung chamber on each day of survey because when we opened the chamber, larvae always re-blocked the hole. We determined developmental time based on larval head width. Body length and thorax width were measured when dung beetle larvae became adults. Morphological traits of larval development and adult dung beetles were measured using a dissecting microscope connected to a digital camera (Tcapture 5.1.1 software, TrueChrom IIS, Tucsen Photonics Co., Ltd., China). In the case of larval development monitoring, we worked partly with 30-, 60-, and 90-d treatments. However, some parts of 60-, 90-d, and 120-d treatments were not monitored because larval mortalities were high in 30-, 60-, and 90-d treatment groups. We presumed that such high mortalities were caused by the daily artificial opening of the chamber. Data collection was terminated when dung beetles reached the adult stage.
Data analysis
Adult survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. A log-rank test was applied to test for significant differences among the four hibernation period groups. Sizes and weights of dung beetle-made brood balls and newly emerged adults and the duration of larval developmental time were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD tests. All data were evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk W test and Levene’s test for assumptions of normality and homogeneity, respectively. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATISTICA v. 8.0 (Statsoft, USA).
Results and Discussion
Effects of hibernation periods on adult dung beetle survival
In our study, the survival of hibernated G. mopsus adults was reduced by approximately 40% in 30-, 60-, and 90-d hibernation groups compared to that in the 120-d hibernation group (100% survival). However, no statistical difference was found because of a low number of replicates (log-rank test, p = 0.389, Fig. 2). Our results indicate that hibernation duration is an important factor for the survival of G. mopsus . This finding is consistent with previous studies showing that insects such as ladybugs, bees, and dung beetles need hibernation for their survival (Bang et al., 2004; Bosch & Kemp, 2003; Jean et al ., 1990). Bosch and Kemp (2003) have reported that the survival of 30-d hibernated Osmia lignaria is lower than that of the group that has hibernated for longer periods of time. In addition, Bang et al. (2004) have found that larvae of the dung beetle (Copris ochus) without a hibernation are not developed and dead.
Effects of hibernation periods on dung beetle fecundity
The total number of eggs in the 30-d hibernation group was only 45%, 32%, or 62% of that in the 60-, 90-, or 120-d hibernation group, respectively. However, the difference was not significant owing to the low number of replicates (p = 0.086, Fig. 3).
Many Coleopteran species are known to require hibernation during the winter season for ovarian maturation (Gittings & Giller, 1997; reviewed in Hodek, 2012; Sakurai et al., 1992). Sakurai et al. (1992) have reported that ovarian maturation of the ladybug (Harmonia axyridis) is rapidly induced during hibernation. Gittings and Giller (1997) have also demonstrated that two Aphodius dung beetle species (A. depressus and A. errattcus) do not have ovarian development before overwintering. Our preliminary study confirmed that non-hibernated G. mopsus adults did not lay eggs. In contrast, Jang et al. (2018) have reported that the fecundity of Protaetia brevitarsis is not affected by the duration of hibernation under laboratory conditions. In the case of P. brevitarsis, it overwinters as 3rd instar larvae, whereas G. mopsus overwinters as the adult. Therefore, these differences might be due to differences in species and growth stage.
Effects of hibernation periods on sizes of offspring
Brood-ball sizes (length, width, and weight) and adult sizes (body length, thorax width, and weight) were similar among the four hibernation treatment groups (Table 1). Tukey’s HSD tests showed that the developmental time of the egg stage was significantly delayed in the 60-d treatment group compared to that in the 30- or 90-d treatment group. In the case of the 2nd instar, developmental time was significantly delayed after the 30-d treatment compared to that with the 60-d treatment. In addition, the duration of hibernation did not affect the developmental time in the 1st instar, 3rd instar, pupation, or egg to adult stages (Table 2). When considered as a whole (i.e., egg to adult), hibernation period had no effect on development time. Differences in developmental time in some developmental stages might be caused by other factors such as handling effects and diet quality rather than hibernation periods of their parents. However, this still clearly demonstrated the development time of each instar for G. mopsus from egg stage to adult stage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a detailed life history of G. mopsus .
Conclusions
In this study, the number of replicates was relatively low to determine significant differences between experimental groups. Most individuals of the dung beetle population collected from Mongolia were not included in this study. We hypothesized that the short hibernation period could have a negative effect on dung beetles. Moreover, shortening of the hibernation period could be a key to increase its rearing efficiency. Our laboratory experiment with hibernation periods, horse dung, and G. mopsus provides a useful design for the establishment of a recovery system and guidelines for an endangered dung beetle. Results of this study indicate that G. mopsus can develop on horse dung as an exclusive diet from eggs to adults. Our preliminary study showed that eight adults consumed approximately 300 g of horse dung every 2 d and made dung balls for oviposition. Therefore, G. mopsus can be reared successfully exclusively on horse dung prey. Effects observed under conditions of a short hibernation period might negatively affect the survival and fecundity of G. mopsus. These findings from the life history traits and the mode of hibernation of G. mopsus might provide important information for establishing successful breeding techniques for the restoration of endangered dung beetles.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Badamdorj for supporting the introduction of dung beetles. This study was supported by a research grant from the Restoration Center for Endangered Species funded by National Institute of Ecol-
Table 1.
Factors | 30 days | 60 days | 90 days | 120 days | F | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ball length (mm) | 19.48±1.25 (13) | 19.73±0.38 (36) | 19.99±0.32 (57) | 18.84±0.31 (28) | 0.865 | 0.461 |
Ball width (mm) | 17.38±0.86 (13) | 17.51±0.30 (36) | 18.28±0.27 (57) | 17.09±0.21 (28) | 1.631 | 0.185 |
Ball weight (g) | 3.42±0.52 (13) | 3.44±0.16 (36) | 3.84±0.17 (57) | 3.13±0.16 (28) | 0.926 | 0.430 |
Adult body length (mm) | 11.00±0.03 (3) | 11.94±0.42 (11) | 11.58±0.33 (22) | 11.81±0.30 (14) | 0.490 | 0.691 |
Adult thorax width (mm) | 7.73±0.82 (3) | 8.38±0.36 (11) | 8.15±0.25 (22) | 8.74±0.24 (14) | 1.170 | 0.330 |
Adult weight (g) | 0.14±0.01 (3) | 0.20±0.03(11) | 0.22±0.05 (22) | 0.22±0.02 (14) | 1.903 | 0.142 |
Values are presented as mean ± SE (N). N is the number of replicates. All factors were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.
Table 2.
Factors | 30 days | 60 days | 90 days | 120 days | F | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Egg | 4.7±0.3(9)a | 6.5±0.6(15)b | 4.1±0.2(15)a | - | 9.878 | 0.001 |
1st instar | 2.0±0.3(8)a | 2.0±0.3(13)a | 2.0±0.3(12)a | - | 0.0 | 1.0 |
2nd instar | 4.9±0.5(7)b | 3.4±0.3(13)a | 3.8±0.4(12)ab | - | 3.148 | 0.058 |
3rd instar | 11.0±3.3(4)a | 15.1±1.1(8)a | 6.3±2.9(3)a | - | 2.075 | 0.168 |
Pupation | 18.5±(3)a | 20.5±3.0(4)a | 16.0(1)a | - | 0.633 | 0.569 |
Egg to adult | 39.5±4.5(3)a | 41.0±0.9(12)a | 40.2±1.1(25)a | 40.3±2.0(15)a | 1.016 | 0.393 |
Values are presented as mean ± SE (N). N is the number of replicates. All factors were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Values with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, p > 0.05).
ogy, Republic of Korea.